None

:marseysnoo:

https://old.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/yciegl/two_alleged_chinese_spies_charged_with_trying_to/

None

Spoiler Alert: it affects mental health badly.

#BanTikTokNow

None

About time Crapple! :chadstevejobs:

None

#BanTikTokNow

None

:#marseyyikes:

#BanTikTokNow

None
None
Reported by:

Serious part: since Reddit hates NFTs so much, these are equal in value to the seethe they produce.

None
Reported by:
  • snus : great reset NWO george soros klaus schwab WEF live in pod own nothing be happy
  • EvilUbie : You don't understand, snus!! We should have never upgraded past XP. Win 7 maybe, but OH SHI---

From the same people who brought you "You Will Eat the Bugs and live in the pod!" and "You will Own Nothing and Be Happy!".

:#marseyobey:

None

:marseyoctopus2:

:marseysnoo:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybdbc6/yes_zuckerbergberg_is_right_whatsapp_is_more/

None
Reported by:
  • sighup : legacy hole sings and I hate it

:#marseysoypoint2:

None

If the next version of the Linux kernel emerges a little slower than usual, blame a dodgy DIMM in Linus Torvalds's AMD Threadripper-powered PC and the vagaries of the memory market.

In a post responding to a kernel developer inquiring if he had missed a Git Pull, Torvalds on Sunday revealed the request was still in his queue as "I'm doing merges (very slowly) on my laptop, while waiting for new ECC memory DIMMs to arrive."

Torvalds needs the DIMMs because over the last few days he experienced what he described as "some instability on my main desktop the … with random memory corruption in user space resulting in my allmodconfig builds randomly failing with internal compiler errors etc."

The Linux boss's first thought was that a new kernel bug had caused the problem – which isn't good but sometimes happens.

His instinct was wrong.

"It was literally a DIMM going bad in my machine randomly after 2.5 years of it being perfectly stable," he wrote. "Go figure. Verified first by booting an old kernel, and then with memtest86+ overnight."

Torvalds appears to have been tracking delivery of the new DIMMs as he reported replacement memory was "out for delivery" and predicted it should arrive later on Sunday evening.

"I'll probably leave memtest86+ for another overnight with the new DIMMs just because this wasn't the greatest experience ever. A fair amount of wasted time blaming all the wrong things, because obviously it wasn't my hardware suddenly going bad," he added.

Torvalds's post is interesting for two other reasons. One is that the laptop he mentions could be the recent MacBook – complete with Arm64 Apple silicon – that he used to push the final cut of Linux 5.19. If that's the same laptop he used on Sunday, said silicon may not be quite up to one of the more high-profile workloads in the world – or perhaps Linus just misses the comforts of a big screen.

None

When Windows 95 debuted all those years ago, it was revolutionary. It introduced many of the features we still use today, including a desktop, taskbar and Start button.

Consumers lapped it up, and it sold some seven million copies in the first five weeks, buoyed by the multimillion-dollar hype. Microsoft spent an estimated $300 million promoting the OS, which included some $12 million for the rights to use the opening chords of the Rolling Stones song "Start Me Up" as its theme tune.

We’ve looked at how the operating system might look on Mobile and Desktop if it was released today, but if you want to actually try out the original again (or for the first time if you came into Windows more recently) you can do so by installing a new app that runs on Windows, macOS, or Linux.

Created by Slack developer Felix Rieseberg, it’s available in the form of an electron app. Most things work exactly as you’d expect them to, including WordPad, FreeCell, Calculator and Media Player, although you can’t currently browse the web with Internet Explorer sadly. It opens but pages don't load.

You can lock or unlock your mouse inside the virtual OS by tapping Esc.

Despite being a fully functioning operating system running in a window, it doesn’t require too much in the way of system resources.

None

No relevant posts on social media yet.


An Unholy Alliance Between Ye, Musk, and Trump

What do you get the contrarian billionaire who has everything? Try a social network to call their own.

It certainly seems like the hot new thing. Almost one year ago, Donald Trump, freshly banned from mainstream platforms, ginned up a Twitter clone called Truth Social, which he claimed would constitute the first “non-cancellable” global community. Elon Musk appears to be going through with his acquisition of Twitter. And earlier this week, many awoke to the news that Ye, formerly Kanye West, plans to acquire Parler after getting the boot from Instagram and Twitter over anti-Semitic rants. If the deal does happen, he’ll inherit the social-media equivalent of a gutted city mall filled with the echoing cries of January 6 defendants and racists.

Soon, we may enter an era where mercurial celebrity landlords dictate the terms of service on their own social networks—ones that are explicitly positioned against content moderation and in favor of a facile understanding of free-speech maximalism. Although the rhetoric they’ve chosen to use to gain support for their stewardship is cribbed from a larger, years-long political battle against Big Tech’s influence, their actions are personal and, in two of the three cases, born from the desperation of running out of major platforms to publish on. None of these men has signaled any desire to create something new as much as they wish to roll the clock back to some shallowly conceived digital Wild West, where the powerful and hateful alike can inflict damage and experience no consequences.

Celebrities have always had vanity projects in the tech space that have allowed them to tap into and monetize their adoring fans (let us not forget the Jeremy Renner app—RIP). These projects almost always wither away in part because they’re weird, but also because they’re walled garden environments, or private spaces. Musk, Trump, and Ye are after something different: They are all obsessed with setting the rules of public spaces.

One way to look at the existence of these would-be social-media barons is as a logical, if depressing, conclusion of the “techlash” that started shortly after Donald Trump’s election. His campaign managed to activate and mobilize communities of trolls to make endless memes and organize harassment campaigns for their “god emperor.” Less than a week after winning, the Trump campaign touted Facebook as “the single most important platform to help grow our fundraising base” and later on extolled the company’s ad targeting as a helpful tool in attracting voters. Employees at both Twitter and Facebook very publicly fretted over the way their cowtools might have played a role in the 2016 election.

By 2017, Facebook was in front of Congress testifying about ads linked to Russian election manipulation. An understandable consensus began to form on the political left that large social networks, but especially Facebook, helped Trump rise to power. The reasons were multifaceted: algorithms that gave a natural advantage to the most shameless users, helpful marketing cowtools that the campaign made good use of, a confusing tangle of foreign interference (the efficacy of which has always been tough to suss out), and a basic attentional architecture that helps polarize and pit Americans against one another (no foreign help required). The misinformation industrial complex—a loosely knit network of researchers, academics, journ*lists, and even government entities—coalesced around this moment. Different phases of the backlash homed in on bots, content moderation, and, after the Cambridge Analytica scandal, data privacy. People can and will argue over the utility and lessons learned from all these debates and scandals, but the broad theme was clear: Social-media platforms are the main communication cowtools of the 21st century, and they matter.

With Trump at the center, the techlash morphed into a culture war with a clear partisan split. One could frame the position from the left as: We do not want these platforms to give a natural advantage to the most shameless and awful people who stoke resentment and fear to gain power. On the right, it might sound more like: We must preserve the power of the platforms to let outsiders have a natural advantage (by stoking fear and resentment to gain power). Put another way, the political world realized that platforms and content-recommendation engines decide which cultural objects get amplified. The left found this troubling, whereas the right found it to be an exciting prospect and something to leverage, exploit, and manipulate via the courts (as evidenced by the Texas social-media law that aims to tell big platforms they can’t moderate the content on their sites). Crucially, both camps resent the power of the technology platforms and believe the companies have a negative influence on our discourse and politics by either censoring too much or not doing enough to protect users and our political discourse.

Because of this stark divide, there’s been more grandstanding than actual policy changes. And because these platforms are massive networks, connecting billions of human beings—and because speech issues and First Amendment law are complex and sometimes counterintuitive—one outcome of the techlash has been an incredibly facile public understanding of content moderation and a whole lot of culture warring.

Musk and Ye aren’t so much buying into the right’s overly simplistic Big Tech culture war as they are hijacking it for their own purposes; Trump, meanwhile, is mostly just mad because his tweets violated Twitter’s terms of service. Each one casts himself as an antidote to a heavy-handed, censorious social-media apparatus that is either captured by progressive ideology or merely pressured into submission by it. But none of them has any understanding of thorny First Amendment or content-moderation issues. They embrace a shallow posture of free-speech maximalism—the very kind that some social-media-platform founders first espoused, before watching their sites become overrun with harassment, spam, and other hateful garbage that drives away both users and advertisers. It’s not clear they even believe in unfettered speech as much as they believe in their own right to take up as much oxygen as possible and face zero penalties.

Another component of this new ownership era is the long-tortured relationship between celebrity and social media. Platforms are a minefield for famous people who post from the hip without PR teams. But for those who can hit the mark without getting banned, social media is a force multiplier for cultural and political relevance and a way around gatekeeping media.

Musk, Ye, and Trump rely on their ability to pick up their phones, go direct, and say whatever they want to their legions of fans, who sound a lot like the yes-men whom billionaires surround themselves with IRL. But the moment they butt up against rules or consequences, they begin to howl about persecution and unfair treatment. The idea of being treated similarly to the rest of a platform’s user base—that is, the people who are not exempt from following a platform’s rules—is so galling to these men that they declare the entire system to be broken.

Though the three all embody the various ways platforms can amplify ideas and confer power, they also demonstrate how being the Main Character of popular and political culture can totally warp perspective. They’re so blinded by their own outlying experiences across social media that, in most cases, they hardly know what it is they’re buying (or in the case of Trump, cloning)—and perhaps they don’t even care. None of these platform acquisitions is a particularly sound business decision. Musk, Ye, and Trump could be doing plenty of more useful or effective things with their money. Instead, they are using a culture war to justify carving out their own safe spaces.

These are projects motivated entirely by grievance and conflict. And so they are destined to amplify grievance and conflict. They couldn’t possibly solve the problems around free speech and power that these three men are nominally compelled by—but we can rest assured that they’ll find a way to create more of them.

Charlie Warzel is a contributing writer at The Atlantic and the author of Galaxy Brain, a newsletter about the internet and big ideas.

None
Reported by:

@VivaldiShill

None

OP is a hypocrite and was exposed for it

You really deleted your post showing off your ultra and then made a post complaining about people showing off their ultra’s. I feel sorry for the people that have to deal with you in life.

Bruh someone changed their mind and were a hypocrite on a stupid social media post and you think it means anything as to the ops character lmao, you are joking [-46]

https://old.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/yaxm51/my_god_please_stop_with_the_ultra_pics_you_have/ite384z/

Hates ultra posts, so he makes another ultra post.

https://old.reddit.com/r/AppleWatch/comments/yaxm51/my_god_please_stop_with_the_ultra_pics_you_have/itdzpue/

I don’t have one….I have the Series 8. Let people get excited about their watches. It’s not that big of a deal lol. Also you literally posted your Ultra watch pic in this subreddit 27 days ago lmao and now other people can’t post theirs. Edit: I’ve woke up to OP deleted all their comments

Excited was a few weeks ago. Now it’s just spamming the good content of this sub. [-88, deleted]

You literally posted yours in here and now wanna complain that people are posting theirs. I’m sure these watches have been on back order and people are just now getting theirs. They are allowed to be excited and show off their purchase just like you did. You know you can press the “hide” button on all these posts if it bothers you so much.

One pic. Weeks ago. It’s over. It’s not new any more. Move the frick on [-74, deleted]

https://www.undelete.pullpush.io/r/AppleWatch/comments/yaxm51/_/itdu7cl/#comment-info

Feel free to leave the sub if it annoys you seeing people get excited and post their watch here cuz there’s no reason why they would all stop posting because of your supposedly ‘warning’ post

It’s not a warning. But I’m posting this same post every single day from now until this stops. And I’m posting the same comment on every single ultra pic that I see posted from now until it stops. Enough is enough. [-12, deleted]

https://www.undelete.pullpush.io/r/AppleWatch/comments/yaxm51/_/itdwbtw/#comment-info

None

The metaverse itself could very well fail for all we know, but Meta's tens of billions being spent is on VR/AR hardware R&D rather than the metaverse or their cartoony software, and they have a lot to show for it, being ahead of the pack with only Apple really being able to compete there.

They have no choice but to keep investing in this, because Facebook growth has plateaued, and the tech industry is all-in on XR as the next big thing, so everyone has a foot in the game - with Meta being as ahead as they are, why would they squander that opportunity?

If XR hardware will reach billions of users in the future, then Meta obviously wants to ride that train in the front carriage.

Hate Meta all you want, but this is just the facts.

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybgqxr/mark_zuckerberg_should_dial_down_the_metaverse/itga53r/

Or we should transition to a decentralized platform(s) where we own our own media and data and let Facebook stock go to zero. :marseyneko:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybgqxr/mark_zuckerberg_should_dial_down_the_metaverse/itgb348/

Facebook needs to go away. Forever. It’s toxic to your health. :marseyinshallah:

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybgqxr/mark_zuckerberg_should_dial_down_the_metaverse/itgb7g0/

Nope. Mark and facebook should just go away. They're both stains on society.

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybgqxr/mark_zuckerberg_should_dial_down_the_metaverse/itg9a2r/

He is actually doing the right thing

Facebook is already history, its user base has already aged out (kids do not use it anymore) and the time to make profit from it will be limited to the next decade or so - so, the company needs something new and he dcided that this new must be the metaverse

right, wrong, indifferent - but the fact that he is looking for something new and not just tinker around with the existing product shows that he is actually a pretty smart guy

Maybe he picked the wrong horse, maybe he is just too early for people to see, but all the naysayers are probably the same that told him facebook was rubbish

https://old.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/ybgqxr/mark_zuckerberg_should_dial_down_the_metaverse/itgb5bk/

None

How long until this is flagged?

None

The guy basically ask access to the switch kernel and would often change switch main theme to one similar to /r/drama, guy would also often shit on other switch home brew dev and auto delete their apps with his auto updates (has access to kernel)

https://old.reddit.com/r/SwitchPirates/comments/q44c4v/anyone_knows_why_the_tinfoil_programmer_says_that/

“The drama had to do with the political views of the programmer and his tendency to insert them into Tinfoil. Best I can tell, Tinfoil's safe. There might be a screen or two that rubs you the wrong - or right, whatever - way depending on how you feel about homosexuality but I use Tinfoil with no problems and it’s easy to set up and understand.”

https://www.fairfieldcitizenonline.com/news/article/Man-faces-gun-charges-in-aftermath-of-domestic-5471905.php

“”Warner was first arrested in December after a fight with his wife turned physical. A neighbor reported hearing a woman yelling, "Just shoot me!" and "You could have killed me!" When officers arrived, they found a loaded gun with a 15-round magazine on the kitchen table. Warner allegedly pushed his wife to the floor during the argument, while she was holding her 1-year-old son. At that time, that gun, along with another .9-mm and a .45-mm were seized by police for safekeeping. He has no weapons registered in Connecticut, though he did have a valid gun license issued by the state of Florida.

He was arrested again April 30 on a charge of first-degree strangulation. At the time, he was in court to answer a charge of violating a protective order, and was released on a $100,000 and was fitted with a GPS bracelet. Warner was arrested on the protective order violation on April 24, after it was discovered he had stayed at his wife's residence while she was out of town.”” (He adding such messages to switch new feeds)

Good luck trying to handwave this away like he’s some poor misunderstood Trump supporter. Anyone defending this is a piece of shit just like him.”

He also had this beef with atmosphere (redit tier soygramera who are anti paricy https://old.reddit.com/r/SwitchPirates/comments/xhtwgm/what_is_atmosphere_memeuand_in_the_tinfoil_shop/

Funniest was when on pc launcher one day (September last year) he release a 400mb update (the program was like 9mb) and many people still use it while that 400mb update was hidden crypto mining toll jfl

None

Orange Site:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33300721

:marseyexcited:

https://rdrama.net/post/115512/google-removes-videos-of-kaynes-interview

https://rdrama.net/post/115624/kanyes-interview-gets-marseyshutitdown-by-google

:marseybluecheck:

https://x.com/shoe0nhead/status/1583826904440000515?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1583826904440000515%7Ctwgr%5Ed2d7f96abfb4a06092039c57513fc7c59f1589ab%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Frdrama.net%2Fpost%2F115624%2Fkanyes-interview-gets-marseyshutitdown-by-google


Don't get me wrong, hate speech is never a good thing in any context. But what kind of bs is this that you cannot have a video on your own cloud drive because it contains "hate speech"? I can see a point if you're publishing a video to a big audience, but for your own personal viewing? What if I were doing a research paper on 1960s civil rights movement, could I not have historical photos of old water fountains, or signs put up on restaurants that read "no colored people"? If this is the future of google drive, I think I might cancel my subscription and look for alternative cloud drives.

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itcpwth/

You guys want monopolies then you get monopolistic behavior.

You cannot both champion the free market and then get mad when the free market makes decisions like this.

The free market is the biggest scam in history. Everywhere a free market has existed, it has just destroyed that nation, that market and abused it's people.

Then the free market idiots have the balls to say "but that wasn't a real free market". BULLSHIT!

The gaslighting from free market advocates is the worst! [sh, but collapsed]

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itcrcvg/

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itctu88/

Thousands if not tens of Thousands of Google drives filled to the brim with cp and other such disgusting material.

Gotta find and destroy all that evil Ye tho. That's the real juicy shit.

Gonna edit this in, so people stop white knighting the big corporation. Google has a history of this, most large social media have an issues with this detestable content. Twitter has an active lawsuit. It's an issue.

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itcta47/

Yeah! Poor neo nazis can't spread genocidal hate speech! This world is so unfair! /s

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itctin6/

The comments... Ffs... "Let me keep mur hate speech" Like a child wanting to keep their stick after throwing it into a crowd.

Hate speech isn’t real though

https://old.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/yaswkg/apparently_you_cannot_have_kanye_interview_on/itcuawq/

None
None
164

I used Chrome's "performance insights" tool. I opened reddit.com and rdrama.net in incognito, and ran the pageload test. NOTE: I am not a webdev so I might be misinterpretting these numbers.

websiteFirst Contentful PaintLargest Contentful PaintTime To Interactive
rdrama0.730.941.17
reddit2.082.579.5 :marseyxd:
average rdrama comment section1.261.292.17
average reddit comment section5.155.3518.15 :marseydicklet:

the average reddit comment section: https://old.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/yabrxc/whats_a_subtle_sign_of_low_intelligence/

the average rdrama comment section: https://rdrama.net/post/115401/reminder-that-the-rjustice4darrell-bait-is

CC: @Aevann @TwoLargeSnakesMating @DrTransmisia @crgd

>be redditor

>wait 10 seconds for reddit front page to load

>go to /r/teenagers

>wait another 10 seconds

>see a picture of an underaged girl

>open comment section

>wait 20 seconds

>type "hey u look so mature want to join my groomercord server"

do redditors really

None
None
Reported by:
  • Yui : https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/download/thanks/

Bravechads stay winning!

:#marseybraveglow:

None

Despite all the up marseys there is some sanity in that thread.

None
Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.