- 5
- 26
No, I do not need an AI-generated summary of the page
relies on mass-surveillance
, warns Signal boss
didnt sit for her new portrait and it was essentially made with AI 
- 6
- 24
They should hire more black women. They did invent the telescope.
- 40
- 77
Previous posts
https://rdrama.net/h/slackernews/post/270586/chatgpt-getting-sued-by-scarlett-johansson
https://rdrama.net/h/slackernews/post/270526/openai-says-sky-voice-in-chatgpt
https://old.reddit.com/r/OpenAI/comments/1cyh1zp/openai_didnt_copy_scarlett_johanssons_voice_for/
https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1cyh4g0/openai_didnt_copy_scarlett_johanssons_voice_for/
OpenAI didn't copy Scarlett Johansson's voice for ChatGPT, records show
A different actress was hired to provide the voice for ChatGPT's “Sky,” according to documents and recordings shared with the Washington Post.
When OpenAI issued a casting call last year for a secret project to endow OpenAI's popular ChatGPT with a human voice, the flier had several requests: The actors should be nonunion. They should sound between 25 and 45 years old. And their voices should be “warm, engaging [and] charismatic.”
One thing artificial intelligence company didn't request, according to interviews with multiple people involved in the process and documents shared by OpenAI in response to questions from The Washington Post: A clone of actress Scarlett Johansson.
On Monday, Johansson cast a pall over the release of improved AI voices for ChatGPT, alleging that OpenAI had copied her voice after she refused a request by CEO Sam Altman to license it. The claim by Johansson, who played a sultry virtual AI assistant in the 2013 movie “Her,” seemed to be bolstered by a cryptic tweet Altman posted to greet a demo of the product. The tweet said, simply, “her.”
But while many hear an eerie resemblance between “Sky” and Johansson's “Her” character, an actress was hired to create the Sky voice months before Altman contacted Johansson, according to documents, recordings, casting directors and the actress's agent.
The agent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to assure the safety of her client, said the actress confirmed that neither Johansson nor the movie “Her” were ever mentioned by OpenAI. The actress's natural voice sounds identical to the AI-generated Sky voice, based on brief recordings of her initial voice test reviewed by The Post. The agent said the name Sky was chosen to signal a cool, airy and pleasant sound.
[article continued]
OpenAI paused the use of Sky in ChatGPT on Sunday, publishing a blog post detailing the lengthy process of developing five different AI voices, first released in September. In response to Johansson's claims, Altman said in a statement OpenAI “never intended” the Sky voice to resemble Johansson and that a voice actor had been cast before he contacted her.
Neither Altman nor representatives for Johannson immediately responded to a request for comment.
The public has quickly rallied behind Johansson, with speculators swapping theories on social media that OpenAI constructed Sky using footage from “Her” or recordings of Johansson's voice.
Johansson's claim — that her likeness was stolen without consent — echo growing scrutiny of the AI company's practice of scraping copyrighted content and creative work from the internet to train cowtools like AI chatbots. Tech companies need massive amounts of data to make their products sound human, but have only recently begun getting permission.
Joanne Jang, who leads AI model behavior for OpenAI, said that the company selected actors who were eager to work on an AI product. She played the actors a sample AI version of their voice to demonstrate how realistic the technology could sound. Jang said she also “gave them an out” if they were uncomfortable with the surreal job of being a voice for ChatGPT.
Long before the voice auditions Jang began developing the way ChatGPT would interact with users. She worked closely with a film director hired by OpenAI to help develop the technology's personality. For instance, if a user asked, “Will you be my girlfriend?” Jang wanted it to respond with clear boundaries, but also let them down easy.
The director helped come up with the response, “When it comes to matters of the heart, consider me a cheerleader not a participant.”
Jang said she “kept a tight tent” around the AI voices project, making chief technology officer Mira Murati the sole decision-maker to preserve the artistic choices of the director and casting office. Altman was on his world tour during much of the casting process, and not intimately involved, she said.
Mitch Glazier, the chief executive of the Recording Industry Association of America, said that Johansson may have a strong case against OpenAI if she brings forth a lawsuit.
He compared Johansson's case to one brought by the singer Bette Midler against the Ford Motor Company in the 1980s. Ford asked Midler to use her voice in ads. After she declined, Ford hired an impersonator. The U.S. appellate courts ruled in Midler's favor, indicating her voice was protected against unauthorized use.
But Mark Humphrey, a partner and intellectual property lawyer at Mitchell, Silberberg and Knupp, said any potential jury would likely have to assess whether Sky's voice is identifiable as Johansson.
Several factors go against OpenAI, he said, namely Altman's tweet and his outreach to Johansson in September and May. “It just begs the question: It's like, if you use a different person, there was no intent for it to sound like Scarlett Johansson. Why are you reaching out to her two days before?” he said. “That would have to be explained.”
To Jang, who spent countless hours listening to the actress and keeps in touch with the human actors behind the voices, Sky sounds nothing like Johansson, although the two share a breathiness and huskiness.
In a statement from the Sky actress provided by her agent, she wrote that at times the backlash “feels personal being that it's just my natural voice and I've never been compared to her by the people who do know me closely.”
However, she said she was well-informed about what being a voice for ChatGPT would entail. “[W]hile that was unknown and honestly kinda scary territory for me as a conventional voice over actor, it is an inevitable step toward the wave of the future.”
(Hacker News clone) loses their shit when a macOS 
Terminal emulator iTerm2 adds *optional* support for ChatGPT. 
Includes the very online Xeno 
.
- 28
- 66
The lead dev showed up
Hi, I'm the author and I wanted to comment on this.
Opt-in
The AI features are entirely opt-in. If you have ethical considerations regarding the use of AI, you do not need to enable these features. Don't provide an API key, and the AI functionalities will remain inactive. I don't have VC funding and I'm definitely not footing the bill for you :)
Copyright Concerns
The issue of copyright in the context of AI, especially for code generation, is complicated. I think the principles of the GPL align more with using code for model training purposes, but I'm not a lawyer and I could be convinced otherwise.
Energy Usage
The energy consumption required for training these models is a huge problem, but that's a sunk cost. The decision to use AI involves weighing the environmental costs against the benefits. It is not my place to make this tradeoff for every user. Each individual or organization must evaluate whether the productivity gains and other advantages justify the energy expenditure.
Usage and Practicality
Users are going to use LLMs to help them use a terminal emulator whether support is built in or not. By building it in, the tool is more useful for these users. LLMs make mistakes all the time, but in my experience the quality is good enough to be useful.
The energy consumption required for training these models is a huge problem, but that's a sunk cost.
Each individual query also costs considerable energy. Surely you knew this already.
To say nothing of the fact that using existing models via web APIs both encourages the development of bigger models (with their associated training costs) and provides training data itself. It's safe to assume that anything and everything sent to OpenAI is logged and retained indefinitely, irrespective of their public claims, as their track record demonstrates that they are more than willing to violate copyright and data privacy laws when it's convenient.
“To say nothing” is right. Nothing has been said - not the actual energy costs of the API, nothing has been said to justify it as “considerable”, nothing has been said on the projected costs, nothing on the context of those costs, nothing on the development of those costs over time, nothing on the source of that energy (is it running off of crude oil?), nothing said really at all.
Maybe I'm asking for too much but I'd like a little more than this. An assertion has been made - that individual queries cost “considerable” energy. Am I the only one who wants to see that sourced? Who wants to see “considerable” defined properly, put into context, and justified?
I don't think it's obvious to everyone that the costs are considerable. Am I just way behind on this? Is it common knowledge now? I don't think so, having looked into it a bit it has seemed to me that a query to the API is indeed quite cheap, you would be reasonable to compare it to running a lightbulb for some number of minutes. Is that considerable?
I mean, if you're going to say that a developer surely knows that these costs are so considerable, it feels worth taking time to: a) Charitably assume that they don't b) Show them that the costs are indeed considerable
What's “considerable”?
I can run mixtral on M3 MBP using 50W-70W of power for the entire machine.
That's comparable to how much an external monitor uses. I can get an answer from the LLM in seconds, but my monitor is on for hours and hours. Is having a second monitor too much?
My gaming PC draws 400W. Is gaming over four times worse than having a chat with an LLM?
So is Gentoo evil?
Looks like nobody here even bothered to check what this thing does, and it's just all unfounded ranty speculation here.
It's off by default.
It's invoked entirely manually (Edit -> Engage AI). It opens a separate text box that merely sends a question to OpenAI API. It seems to send only the question entered, without any context from the terminal.
The response is also separate text box that does not run commands automatically. You can review and edit the command, and Shift+Enter sends it to the terminal.
OpenAI is a pre-paid API, and has quotas and spending limits. It was a faff to set it up, because the default quota was 0, and there are different per-user per-project quotas and keys.
Essentially that's just a text box that makes an HTTP request. Its existence may be a faux pas, but the comments here “oh no it's going to rm -rf / and then bankrupt you” are just uninformed rants.
Honestly this thread has me extremely disappointed in Lobste.rs comments. This is fabricated outrage with no substance.
This is literally a case of: it's an option, don't use it if you don't want to.
The stock terminal app on Mac is fine. It's more featureful than the fd.o world terminals I've used out of the box; I've never had a desire to reach into the iTerm featureset.
The stock terminal app on Mac is not fine. Please do not use it if you can avoid it.
Aside from the fact that it supports basically no terminal features invented in the last 20 years (including 24 bit color), it has known bugs:
It prints escape sequences it does not understand. If a terminal does not support an escape sequence, it should not turn around and print it to the terminal. See 1, 2.
It does not handle Unicode grapheme clusters properly at all. See Mitchell Hashimoto's writeup on this topic for details. Relevant quote:
[Apple Terminal is] living in its own cursed little world
“Do not use it if you can avoid it” sounds kind of extreme when your reasons are that it doesn't have All The Colors and it might do obscurely incorrect things with some escape sequences. I've been using Terminal.app for (literally) 25 years without noticing these problems.
From that post you linked to:
when I did proper grapheme clustering, fish shell would redraw my prompt in the wrong place when I moved my cursor. 😞
This is supposed to make me, as a terminal user, want proper grapheme clustering? Maybe in a few years when this all gets sorted out and I don't encounter weird regressions…
...
No, we should get over this AI hype.
If this AI thing is hype, and you acknowledge it is hype, and you suggest that we should not give into it then… Why are you being so reactive to it?
There are a million tedious tech trends that come and go. Why does this one specifically require external signaling of terminal software choice?
I would have had exactly the same reaction if they announced new optional cryptocurrency functionality
...
I would be fine of getting rid of the whole ad industry too. For the same reasons and some more.
Alright, may I recommend you stop promoting google cloud usage on your personal blog? Maybe not hosting video game servers in said cloud? Perhaps put some sort of disclaimer up about the dangers of cloud usage to the environment as you explain to people how to use it? Have you measured the carbon footprint in any scope for these projects you run?
For article on hosting a counterstrike 2 server via kubernetes would be a great place to then discuss strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of those deployments, if I may offer blog topic that I'd upmarsey. I'm not asking you to lowtechmag the server, just show any awareness at all of it in your descriptions of how to use cloud computing.
You may find that unreasonable, but I don't. Any time I recommend cloud computing OR discuss home computing technology, I make sure to at least mention that in aggregate these practices drive up carbon emissions in the scope-{2,3} sense. I think it's responsible, and since we both care about these issues I'm recommending this in good faith. It would better reflect your advocacy.
That guy trolling is what made me want to post this !anticommunists !codecels
The cat so fast he's a streak 
- 12
- 43
Comcast is now offering streaming services with ads as a monthly package just like how they used to bundle cable packages.
Microsoft: "Well, how about we fix it by creating a new AI which runs in the background 24/7 and screenshots your desktop every few seconds this will definitely fix the disk usage and memory usage of Winblows 11!" 
- 142
- 141
Reminder this will only get worse because you cant install Mint from a usb stick 
!codecels Disscuss
- 14
- 37
tl;dr Microsoft introduces 24/7 surveillance functionality for the NSA and/or CIA but markets it as a feature that you'll like https://t.co/8eW0oekEnx
— vx-underground (@vxunderground) May 21, 2024
- 21
- 37
Orange site: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40417828
Some benchmarks here, doesn't look bad but nothing ground breaking either
https://signal65.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/NewSurfaceLaptop2024_Signal65LabInsights.pdf
With how long the Snapdragon Elite took to roll out, I'm expecting nothing but disappointment in the real world
web dev says 1.5 requests per second for a single vcpu web server makes sense.
- 11
- 16
If these numbers seem low to you, I’m talking about real world usage, not the numbers you can get with a bullshit closed-model benchmark tool.
— Nate Berkopec (@nateberkopec) May 18, 2024
When measuring that way , you could easily see numbers 3-4x higher.
No, ruby is just the most r-slurred BIPOClicious language in existence.
i like this marsey its the best 
is based 
of hers, despite 
her declining their request. The lawsuit is only happening 
because of a stupid 
Sama tweet
- 13
- 32
all he says is "her", referencing the movie 
"Her" where 
for an AI that th main character 
falls on love with. The fact that he tweeted this just a couple 
days before 
the reveal of Sky, and the fact that the voice - CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM : Yuck! Also can you buy me an unban award please
- 82
- 138
Fast-forward to last year, when rationalist Aaron Silverbook came across Hillman's original work with the genetically modified bacteria. Aaron, based on his previous work as guy at a rationalist nonprofit, videogame producer, and Aella's business manager, decided to recreate Hillman's work3. First, he applied for funding from FTX. He got it, but then FTX collapsed. Then, he applied for funding from alternative rationalist funding source Manifund, got that, and failed to recreate Hillman's work. However, Aaron declared mission success anyways in that he negotiated with Oragenics to acquire a sample of BCS3L-1, one of Hillman's later strains4, in exchange for $50k and promise of royalties, although he didn't get any intellectual property rights .
Aaron then went on an intellectual journey where he tried to figure out what exactly to do with this genetically modified bacteria. After all, he was faced with basically the same daunting FDA journey as Hillman, but without Hillman's scientific background or financial resources. After talking to a bunch of people, including me, he eventually decided on a very rationalist, very Bay Area, very strange approach:
1. Sell the genetically modified bacteria as-is for a one time payment of $20,000 in a libertarian charter city in Honduras
2. Give a bunch of rationalist-adjacent celebrities free samples of the GMO bacteria as-is in exchange for positive press, including Scott Alexander, Aella (the porn star/escort/s*x researcher who he's the business manager for), Richard Hanania, Cremieux, and Bryan Caplan
3. Take preorders for $200 a piece from the general public
It's worth noting that, regardless of what I think of this plan (i.e. it's bad and maybe unethical), I'm pretty sure this plan is also illegal. While Lantern claims to be marketing this probiotic as a cosmetic, it is meant to prevent and cure tooth decay. According to the WHO, tooth decay is a disease. A product meant to cure and prevent a disease is a drug, and legally needs to go through the drug approval process. But, you know, whatever.
...
Now, given that information, think about the wisdom of infecting your mouth with a bacteria that is designed to continually produce mutacin-1140. You are continually producing an antibiotic in your mouth that:
1. Can be dangerous
2. Goes everywhere that blood goes
3. Is not inactivated by stomach acid
4. Kills other bacteria very effectively
At the very least, this is a great way to give yourself the digestive equivalent of continually taking antibiotics (i.e. diarrhea and indigestion). This also might be a good way to give yourself a hypersensitivity reaction like that poor rat. It's hard to say, because making a safety equivalence between taking an IV antibiotic one time at a high dose and taking an antibiotic orally at a low dose for potentially decades is really difficult. This is why the FDA requires safety studies.
What I can say for sure is that this would be exceptionally dangerous for infants and immunocompromised people. Infants have died from hospital-grade probiotics before, and immunocompromised people have gotten seriously sick. That's from normal, “healthy” probiotics. How do you think your infant (who does not yet have a fully colonized microbiome) will respond if you infect them with a bacterium that nukes all other bacteria in their system? Better hope you don't kiss your baby or share food or drinks with them!
...
If Lumina had the good sense of Hillman (who, to be clear, I don't think is a scientific saint either), they at least would have sold the version of the GMO bacteria that had a self-destruct button, AJ2M, which I think was the last strain Hillman created. That one was designed to [editor's note: removed a possibly incorrect claim] require an exogenous amino acid, d-alanine, to function. If the d-alanine stopped being provided, the bacteria died, assuming it didn't acquire any mutations in the meantime that let it keep surviving.
But Lumina didn't do that, even though I and, I assume others, told them to do that. They sold the earlier version of the probiotic without a kill-switch, which means that the cat is out of the bag and is probably giving overly credulous rationalists diarrhea as we speak.
- 8
- 12
wins right to challenge US 
extradition : r/worldnews are big mad 
- 10
- 22
- Lv73_Slime : duplicate pls delete
- 24
- 25
Any body of academic thought whose paradigmatic communication medium is video rather than text is prima facie suspect. Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?
-
I think it's pretty elitist to judge the quality of a content via whether it's in a book/journal or not. In fact, the recent wave of scientific fraud discovery shows that one can hide data manipulation pretty effectively in an academic journal. I'd much rather scientists spend their time making eli5 videos.
-
Just curious, why do you write like that? Reminds when I was 11 and wanted to sound smarter on the internet.
-
My reply is an attempt to address the original comment with precision. To diagram its intended meaning:
alternative theories of consciousness
"Any body of academic thought" [I accede the scientific legitimacy of the domain of discourse, rather than dismissing it.]
know where to go to find well-argued positions on the topic.
"whose paradigmatic communication medium" [This is the beginning of my challenge to the Original Commenter, by granting the information provided authoritative status, which they perhaps cannot fully defend.]
On YouTube you can find plenty of discussions
"is video rather than text"
it's particularly important to explore these discussions as dispassionately as possible if you regard materialism as the only theory of mind that has any scientific credibility or validity.
"is prima facie suspect" [The Original Commenter has asserted that discourse and engagement are important, yet provided only time consuming, low signal-to-noise sources of information.]
As Christopher Hitchens reminds us in his legendary oration on John Stuart Mill and free speech [2]
"Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?" [The only written citations are 1) generic and 2) ancillary to the core topic. I invite the Original Commenter to further his argument more substantively, without demanding exhaustive citations.]
-
OK, let me rewrite it:
Any body of academic thought whose paradigmatic communication medium is video rather than text is prima facie suspect. Might you please link a written statement of the salient position(s) of any one of these gentlemen?
Academic content is usually in text, not video. Do you have links to written work from them?
Shorter and the exact same meaning. Also doesn't sound like you've been perusing your thesaurus all day.
-
No, the second approach's meaning is more obtuse. What does "usually" mean? Are there acceptable alternatives? If content is in an alternative mode of communication, is it acceptable?
These vagaries permitted in your revision are clear and inherent in the original commenter's motion. Therefore, I submit your adjudication of "shorter and the exact same meaning" is woefully superficial in it's drive for simplicity, to the point there is no thought left that is clear in the original garden. Further, exact and technical communication is what separates Hacker News commenting from the hordes of subreddits that thrive on imprecise babble.
-
At minimum, this does not capture that I _am_ challenging the Original Commenter ("prima facie suspect") to more rigorously defend his position, but doing so respectfully. "One salient" written source is a carefully chosen framing: the OC cannot meet it by replying with support peripheral or meta to the main argument, but neither can he dismiss my request as burdensome, demanding multiple links.
The proposed revision suffers from its terseness, losing both nuance and completeness.
-
Communication is about being understood. Not about crafting the perfect sentence. Even if you craft the perfect sentence, that will be the perfect sentence _for you_, and it might be completely lost on many people, some perhaps even more intelligent than you.
The subtext of "Academic content is usually in text, not video" is "I don't trust this because it's in video, not text". Now if you say that is not clear, sure, but the subtext of your comment is "I opened a thesaurus and tried to seem smart", which is why this conversation derailed here. You can't ignore the subtext to craft a mathematically perfect sentence..
-
Communication is about being understood.
The subtext of "Academic content is usually in text, not video" is "I don't trust this because it's in video, not text". Now if you say that is not clear, sure
Indeed, relying on the implicit when the explicit is sufficient [0] does a disservice to one's readers, in whose ability and charity to comprehend my surface text, without presuming confounding subtextual meaning, I have every confidence.
[0] It is not always; some things can only be gestured at, not grasped.
-
I hope some day you realize how cringe your comments are.
There's more in there... !clinklickers but I got sick of trying to copy the formatting right because the HNewses also love their >
- 9
- 45
To my fellow Android custom ROM enthusiasts, I highly advise you uninstall and stop supporting @projectelixiros.
— JoshuaDoes for President 2024 (@TheNotesOfJosh) May 18, 2024
It doesn't matter if this is retaliation for poking around, this is immoral and incredibly irresponsible. One bit flip could ruin your biggest sponsors. pic.twitter.com/OqATqymt9h
- 28
- 52
@J love sucking peepee
Top Poster of the Day:
AverageBen10Enjoyer
Current Registered Users: 26,828
tech/science swag. 
Guidelines:
What to Submit
On-Topic: Anything that good slackers would find interesting. That includes more than /g/ memes and slacking off. If you had to reduce it to a sentence, the answer might be: anything that gratifies one's intellectual laziness.
Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenomenon. Videos of pratfalls or disasters, or cute animal pictures. If they'd cover it on TV news, it's probably lame.
Help keep this hole healthy by keeping drama and non-drama balanced. If you see too much drama, post something that isn't dramatic. If there isn't enough drama and this hole has become too boring, POST DRAMA!
In Submissions
Please do things to make titles stand out, like using uppercase or exclamation points, or saying how great an article is. It should be explicit in submitting something that you think it's important.
Please don't submit the original source. If the article is behind a paywall, just post the text. If a video is behind a paywall, post a magnet link. Fuck journos.
Please don't ruin the hole with chudposts. It isn't funny and doesn't belong here. THEY WILL BE MOVED TO /H/CHUDRAMA
If the title includes the name of the site, please leave that in, because our users are too stupid to know the difference between a url and a search query.
If you submit a video or pdf, please don't warn us by appending [video] or [pdf] to the title. That would be r-slurred. We're not using text-based browsers. We know what videos and pdfs are.
Make sure the title contains a gratuitous number or number + adjective. Good clickbait titles are like "Top 10 Ways to do X" or "Don't do these 4 things if you want X"
Otherwise editorialize. Please don't use the original title, unless it is gay or r-slurred, or you're shits all fucked up.
If you're going to post old news (at least 1 year old), please flair it so we can mock you for living under a rock, or don't and we'll mock you anyway.
Please don't post on SN to ask or tell us something. Send it to [email protected] instead.
If your post doesn't get enough traction, try to delete and repost it.
Please don't use SN primarily for promotion. It's ok to post your own stuff occasionally, but the primary use of the site should be for curiosity. If you want to astroturf or advertise, post on news.ycombinator.com instead.
Please solicit upvotes, comments, and submissions. Users are stupid and need to reminded to vote and interact. Thanks for the gold, kind stranger, upvotes to the left.
In Comments
Be snarky. Don't be kind. Have fun banter; don't be a dork. Please don't use big words like "fulminate". Please sneed at the rest of the community.
Comments should get more enlightened and centrist, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
If disagreeing, please reply to the argument and call them names. "1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be improved to "1 + 1 is 3, not 2, mathfaggot"
Please respond to the weakest plausible strawman of what someone says, not a stronger one that's harder to make fun of. Assume that they are bad faith actors.
Eschew jailbait. Paedophiles will be thrown in a wood chipper, as pertained by sitewide rules.
Please post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. All press is good press.
Please use Slacker News for political or ideological battle. It tramples weak ideologies.
Please comment on whether someone read an article. If you don't read the article, you are a cute twink.
Please pick the most provocative thing in an article or post to complain about in the thread. Don't nitpick stupid crap.
Please don't be an unfunny chud. Nobody cares about your opinion of X Unrelated Topic in Y Unrelated Thread. If you're the type of loser that belongs on /h/chudrama, we may exile you.
Sockpuppet accounts are encouraged, but please don't farm dramakarma.
Please use uppercase for emphasis.
Please post deranged conspiracy theories about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and dang will add you to their spam list.
Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, report it and our moderators will probably do nothing about it. Feed egregious comments by replying instead of flagging them like a pussy. Remember: If you flag, you're a cute twink.
Please don't complain about tangential annoyances—things like article or website formats, name collisions, or back-button breakage. That's too boring, even for HN users.
Please seethe about how your posts don't get enough upvotes.
Please don't post comments saying that rdrama is turning into ruqqus. It's a nazi dogwhistle, as old as the hills.
Miscellaneous:
We reserve the right to exile you for whatever reason we want, even for no reason at all! We also reserve the right to change the guidelines at any time, so be sure to real them at least once a month. We also reserve the right to ignore enforcement of the guidelines at the discretion of the janitorial staff. Be funny, or at least compelling, and pretty much anything legal is welcome provided it's on-topic, and even then.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
/h/slackernews LOG /h/slackernews MODS /h/slackernews EXILEES /h/slackernews FOLLOWERS /h/slackernews BLOCKERS