Compared to the original:
Made this after yet another miserable attempt to save the userbase of one of my old alma maters, /r/skeptics which has become a shadow of it's former self and half the mods are thin skinned 
cute twink astrotufer fake butt skeptics (no true scotsman ya know?) who got cucked by terfs at some point and spend all the time pooping up one of my old favorite centrist communities with non-stop quackery (
shit) as well as wingcuckery to the max.
In this latest episode and forage into fake skepticsville I did find some hope that some are amenable to not wanting to look completely fricking r-slurred and made a post about why the JD Vance video was literally the worlds most obvious fricking fake on the planet earth.
Before I get into it I'll clarify that Redditors fell for this hard:
based on that I figured there was a teachable moment buried in all of this shit that could reach both sides since it helps lefties stop being r-slurred and also by default dispels a hoax about vance 
I was wrong, but also unsurprised.
My first post was immediately removed of course and its tradition at this point, because basically all posts on /r/skeptic there now are auto-removed until you spam the jannys for permission which I did.
Their explanation doesn't make any sense but I could be wrong because I don't janny shit since we made love4landlords went red and yellow.
apparently all effortposts on /r/skeptic with any links (as in trying to fricking literally cite your sources of information with more than one shitty trans opinion article ) is now AUTO REMOVED. Curious. My own personal conspiracy is
that they did this out of spite because one of you guys !transphobes made a good effort post one time and linked all of the verboten science showing gender dysphoria isn't real and just a fancy name for an acquired condition that causes a chronic copemine deficiency which in real medicine is called being a pathetic little b-word (who was either coddled by mama or alternatively abused/groomed too much growing up, source: nursing science)
anyway facts aside, I bit the bullet and split the post into a singular link for the r-slurs and posted my write up separately. The post has done well because there's still a few old marbles rolling around there it seems who haven't been banned by the jannies yet, however the astroturfing newcute twink r-slur fake skeptic denizens were likely offended by my facts and only about a dozen people have even read the whole fricking point I made the post which was to try and help the children learn how critical thinking works.
In any event here's the post where I had to split up the link and my write up in a comment because you can't link facts anymore in /r/skeptics lol:
https://old.reddit.com/r/skeptic/comments/1jizari/info_regarding_a_leaked_audio_ai_hoax_of_jd_vance/
Link to my original write up in attempts to help redditors unfrick themselves with some helpful tips for spotting AI, which even dramatards could apparently use a lesson in 
:
I consider this pretty sound and sage advice but alas basically no one read it and the majority of the hundred or so comments are by a bunch of complete absolute fricking hypoxic snot licking imbeciles. Here are some of the best excerpts:
I corrected him politely just saying actually maybe justr don't fricking jump to conclusions like a good skeptic, which prompted further autism from some other fricking non-skeptic loser TDS cuck:
Your logic is way of base. I make films for a living and we take recording audio pretty seriously. It's extremely difficult to get good high-quality audio unless you have a mic in someone's face. As you've probably seen when we can't have a Mike on camera we put it as close as the person as possible on a boom. The standard Mike used the situation Costs a couple of thousand dollars and better options cost four and five. This supposedly leaked audio sounds exactly as good as you would expect if you were recording someone a few feet away using a phone on a desk or concealed under a piece of paper or in a pocket.
Everybody can tell when they are "on speaker" because the change in audio quality is so apparent and that's with high-quality processing in a modern phone. The argument that this recording is fake because the quality is poor is back to Front. If it sounded as if someone was speaking directly into a mic, you would know it was fake.
How tf does person pretend to get paid to do this shit that I can do for fun and they cannot even differentiate something made by trolls?
I again searched for the effort to help these developmentally disable posers, but to no avail, they started downpooping me, ungrateful fricks:
Nothing could prepare me for the king of neurodivergent libertarians audiophiles, a peak Oldcute twink Leftist Redditor !atheists who posted the most confidently incorrect Adderall fueled r-slur rants that I've seen in awhile, 
read at your own peril:
I have run recording studios for 35 years. I have done forensic work for most of the major insurance companies in my my State, more than a dozen lawyers, lots of private investigators, the State ad Local police, EMS, and our local airport. I have the same noise reduction cowtools the FBI and CIA use. I have heard both much better and much worse recordings made since smartphones became a thing.
The greatest determinants (as a user above pointed out regarding location sound on film) to sound quality are the microphone and the proximity of the mic to the subject. People recording surreptitiously often put their phones/ recorders in jacket or pants pockets. Sometimes they start a recorder in a hidden location near where they hope the speaker will be when incriminating himself. Often that's not the case. We have no way of knowing what kind of device this was recorded with, we don't know what the microphone was, or whether it had a directional or omnidriectional pickup pattern. It sounds like a mic halfway across an office. The reverberant quality of the background noises are consistent with the reverberant voice reflections in the room. I certainly wouldn't assume the noise was added after the fact.
I actually would not immediately jump to disbelieving the whole thing without evidence for it being fake. Someone claiming it is fake is not evidence. I have used AI voice generation for a few paid projects, and quite a bit, just out of my own curiosity. The thing that AI still gets wrong most often is inflection, especially if there is no punctuation to push it in a particular direction- things like pauses for a comma, hooking up the pitch of the words at the end of an interrogative sentence, loud, definitive exclamations, etc. Those cues that follow punctuation are easier than those which don't rely on punctuation. Getting an AI voice to inflect something like anger, or sarcasm, or hushed intensity isn't easy. You can't type in those kinds of inflections with normal punctuation marks. I understand that a new AI training tool that changes all of that is coming. Apparently some company is working on a way to scan and learn one person's delivery and then replace their words with an AI voice, but following the cadence, speed, lilt, pauses, etc. of the person training it for that particular job.\
So, yeah, it's conceivable that someone who does a great Vance impersonation was able to further polish the voice with AI to create this. But as important as it is to not leap to conclusions regarding something like this (if the real truth matters to you at all), it's important to look at all the evidence before rendering a hard conclusion. We don't have all the evidence, so the safer thing to do is to not claim someone said something they, perhaps, did not. But it's also good to have a working theory, as long as you're willing to accept new data that can discredit your assumption. That's what I'm doing. Until someone can prove otherwise, I have to imagine it is what it sounds like. Would anyone be surprised to find out he feels that way? It certainly would have made sense for him to have said that. When someone shows me convincing evidence that it is not him, I'll change my mind. But I'd bet my left nut it's genuine.
This dumb fricker literally cannot distinguish reality and wrote a novel under his pen name:
L. E. Akshually 
Go figure he too has TDS and also he lepardsatemyfacemaxxes as a cope:
Literally he spent like an hour on that shit to try and "1-up" me and failed like a bitcho as I was immediately able to show he was r-slurred as this is what inspired the video I posted which took tens of minutes. Audiophiles have some of the worst r-slurs of all time. By nature of the fact their so braindead they can't even apply anything they've learned about how basic HEARING SHIT AND SOUND WORKS. 
Anyway like I said that annoyed me enough to stage a quick video with some AI voice synth which inspired this whole post because I think it came out pretty good.
I'm still waiting to see what he says in response to this video and see if all of his fake wisdom will allow him see reality, I suspect he will not and continue to shit up skeptics spaces like all the other ladygardens, ah well.
Anyway beyond that, here's some additional proof that this whole subreddit needs to get nuked and get rebuilt by actual skeptics since it's been astroturfed by Resetera Megan's Law enthusiasts formerly known as the OG incel G*mergater quacks now masquerading as skeptics.
Lets get into it, first off, it's definitely real if JD vance denies it:
b-b-b-but trump and MAGAs are r-slurred too!!! 
Yea no fricking shit you dumb mother fricker
This guy waited like two years to start commenting and he's already off to a failed start:
Also I hadn't heard of /r/MAGANAZI before today but it sounds like a bait sub but also rolls off the tongue way better that marchagainstnazis or whatever the frick that old annoying shitsub was.
Ah hey and look who it is, the libertarian and/or roblox kid being groomed by s. The tard gangs all here:
Anyway, if you want more seethe !aichads look at how many fricking r-slurred AI haters there are out there, this should be an important lesson for !masterbaiters, it just takes one good idea and a beefy GPU real or cloud to frick with the literal internet (and by tangent the vice president of the united states.) Get a load of all these fricks:
https://old.reddit.com/r/50501/comments/1jicc6t/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
https://old.reddit.com/r/millenials/comments/1jihv5k/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/ < --- !millenials we should harass these people in particular
https://old.reddit.com/r/VaushV/comments/1jickxk/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
https://old.reddit.com/r/MAGANAZI/comments/1jibaah/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
https://old.reddit.com/r/AccidentalAlly/comments/1jibqmy/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Whistleblowers/comments/1jib9ll/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
https://old.reddit.com/r/Staiy/comments/1jiml5o/leaked_jd_vance_audio_on_elon_musk/
Considering the above, the skeptic's thing is not quite so bad, but whatever. High standards for shit is what used to make it great. 
!chuds get a W for this since I couldn't find as many rightoids taking the bait.
!jannies effortpost or rope
!animalposters Check out queeries big ol' peepers as he hides from the Wrath of Baby Face Beardson
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I didn't read all this bb but I loved the queerie petting in the vid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context