The hypothesis that "Mods of large, high volume subreddits spend their (precious) time maliciously banning users that never broke a subreddit rule or sitewide rule" is far outweighed, in both reason and in historic evidence, by the alternative hypothesis that "Banned user doesn't understand the rules, or does, and won't admit fault".
I did a study on subreddit bans to find out the truth, and mods do make mistakes and accidentally ban people, but almost always reverse it when they see it. And almost all mods (save mods without modmail privileges) see ban appeals.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
robywar in r/modnews:
And if the banned person, in fact, broke no written rules?
Reply by Bardfinn in r/modnews:
The hypothesis that "Mods of large, high volume subreddits spend their (precious) time maliciously banning users that never broke a subreddit rule or sitewide rule" is far outweighed, in both reason and in historic evidence, by the alternative hypothesis that "Banned user doesn't understand the rules, or does, and won't admit fault".
I did a study on subreddit bans to find out the truth, and mods do make mistakes and accidentally ban people, but almost always reverse it when they see it. And almost all mods (save mods without modmail privileges) see ban appeals.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
BARD BOT ALERT!Current streak was: 0 days 00 hours 49 minutes and 17 seconds
Record is 1 days 13 hours 09 minutes and 59 seconds by TheDunceonFlorist
Average time between mentions: 0 days 01 hours 10 minutes and 50 seconds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context