Unable to load image

Bard spotting on Bluesky 08 February 2025 :marseyrandom:

Here we spot wild Bardfinn Bluesky activities.

Be valid and ping ! bardfinn for something worthwhile or create a new thread.

1
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️🌈 (@chimeracoder.bsky.social):

While this comparison is actually too generous to Facebook (see my reply for why), even as presented here is appalling how clearly our legal system applies a double standard to corporations and billionaires vs. progressive activists fighting for justice.

Mushtaq Bilal, PhD (@mushtaqbilalphd.bsky.social):

Meta illegaly downloaded 80+ terabytes of books from LibGen, Anna's Archive, and Z-library to train their AI models.

In 2010, Aaron Swartz downloaded only 70 GBs of articles from JSTOR (0.0875% of Meta). Faced $1 million in fine and 35 years in jail. Took his own life in 2013.


Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️🌈 (@chimeracoder.bsky.social):

Aaron Swartz is often incorrectly remembered for "illegally downloading JSTOR papers", but all he did was use a university network that was INTENTIONALLY freely accessible. Furthermore, he did not distribute the papers, nor is there evidence that he ever intended to.

bsky.app/profile/chim...

Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️🌈 (@chimeracoder.bsky.social):

This comparison is too fair to Facebook. Not only did Swartz not actually do anything with any of the data (he literally only downloaded it), but he also did so from a computer network that was both open to the public and specifically authorized to access that data without authentication, by design.


Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):

there is no evidence that he ever intended to

Rebuttal β€” web.archive.org/web/20130116...

"Copyright law no longer makes sense. As an average person (not a printer), I shouldn't be restricted from noncommercially redistributing someone else's work."

Bits are not a bug.


Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):

That statement was authored in 2008 when Swartz was 12 or 13, but also, was never retracted, and remained up after his death.

The statement goes directly to intent of acts.


Aditya Mukerjee 🦦 🏳️🌈 (@chimeracoder.bsky.social):

That statement was authored in 2008 when Swartz was 12 or 13

lol wat


Ms. Penny Oaken, SkyWitch (@skywitches.net):

Oh I did the math badly, it would be when he was 22

Sorry

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Now playing: Primal Rave (DKC2).mp3

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.