The Indian Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in favour of same-s*x marriage this week.
As part of a set of petitions issued by two same-s*x couples, the New Delhi court will hear arguments for the recognition of same-s*x marriage on Friday (6 January).
The lead petition, filed by gay couple Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dange, has argued that denying LGBTQ+ citizens the right to marry is an affront to their right to equality.
Currently, India does not officially recognise same-s*x marriage, but allows couples to engage in an “unregistered cohabitation.”
This effectively means that same-s*x couples aren't legally permitted to inherit assets or adopt. It can also complicate hospital visits if one-half of the couple is under strict visitation rules when hospitalised.
The petitioners have argued that, since inter-faith heterosexual couples are protected via Supreme Court rulings, then LGBTQ+ couples would naturally follow.
The second petition, filed by Parth Phiroze Mehrotra and Uday Raj, argues that barring LGBTQ+ couples from marriage equality violates several articles of the constitution.
"If the petitioners, as a same-s*x couple, enjoyed access to the civil institution of marriage, they would not face untold practical difficulties, both vis-a-vis each other and their children," the petition read.
"The denial of the fundamental right of marriage to persons like the petitioners is a complete violation of constitutional law."
As part of the 6 January hearing, the Indian government is expected to voice its opinion on both petitions, as well as its current position on same-s*x marriage.
Indian government unlikely to support same-s*x marriage
Prime minister Modi's government previously declared that same-s*x couples in India "cannot claim a fundamental right for same-s*x marriage" during a similar hearing in 2021.
It clarified its stance to the Delhi High Court, where it said that LGBTQ+ couples do not deserve the same rights as "traditional" heterosexual couples.
"Living together as partners and having a sexual relationship by same-s*x individuals is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife and children," the government told the High Court.
While the government's position is unlikely to change, a shift in public perception toward LGBTQ+ couples could see a victory for petitioners in a similar fashion to the decriminalisation of same-s*x relationships in 2018.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Snapshots:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/01/03/india-same-s*x-marriage-petition-inches-closer
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2023/01/03/india-same-s*x-marriage-petition-inches-closer&run=1 (click to archive)
lead petition:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2022/11/25/same-s*x-marriage-petition-india-supreme-court/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2022/11/25/same-s*x-marriage-petition-india-supreme-court/&run=1 (click to archive)
6 January hearing:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-02/hearings-on-google-fine-and-gay-marriage-reach-india-s-courts
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-02/hearings-on-google-fine-and-gay-marriage-reach-india-s-courts&run=1 (click to archive)
similar hearing in 2021.:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2021/01/07/india-equal-marriage-lgbt-same-s*x-delhi-kavita-arora-ankita-khanna-lgbt/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2021/01/07/india-equal-marriage-lgbt-same-s*x-delhi-kavita-arora-ankita-khanna-lgbt/&run=1 (click to archive)
decriminalisation of same-s*x relationships in 2018.:
https://web.archive.org/https://thepinknews.com/2019/09/06/india-gay-s*x-decriminalised-one-year/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//thepinknews.com/2019/09/06/india-gay-s*x-decriminalised-one-year/&run=1 (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context