The Indian Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments in favour of same-s*x marriage this week.
As part of a set of petitions issued by two same-s*x couples, the New Delhi court will hear arguments for the recognition of same-s*x marriage on Friday (6 January).
The lead petition, filed by gay couple Supriyo Chakraborty and Abhay Dange, has argued that denying LGBTQ+ citizens the right to marry is an affront to their right to equality.
Currently, India does not officially recognise same-s*x marriage, but allows couples to engage in an “unregistered cohabitation.”
This effectively means that same-s*x couples aren't legally permitted to inherit assets or adopt. It can also complicate hospital visits if one-half of the couple is under strict visitation rules when hospitalised.
The petitioners have argued that, since inter-faith heterosexual couples are protected via Supreme Court rulings, then LGBTQ+ couples would naturally follow.
The second petition, filed by Parth Phiroze Mehrotra and Uday Raj, argues that barring LGBTQ+ couples from marriage equality violates several articles of the constitution.
"If the petitioners, as a same-s*x couple, enjoyed access to the civil institution of marriage, they would not face untold practical difficulties, both vis-a-vis each other and their children," the petition read.
"The denial of the fundamental right of marriage to persons like the petitioners is a complete violation of constitutional law."
As part of the 6 January hearing, the Indian government is expected to voice its opinion on both petitions, as well as its current position on same-s*x marriage.
Indian government unlikely to support same-s*x marriage
Prime minister Modi's government previously declared that same-s*x couples in India "cannot claim a fundamental right for same-s*x marriage" during a similar hearing in 2021.
It clarified its stance to the Delhi High Court, where it said that LGBTQ+ couples do not deserve the same rights as "traditional" heterosexual couples.
"Living together as partners and having a sexual relationship by same-s*x individuals is not comparable with the Indian family unit concept of a husband, wife and children," the government told the High Court.
While the government's position is unlikely to change, a shift in public perception toward LGBTQ+ couples could see a victory for petitioners in a similar fashion to the decriminalisation of same-s*x relationships in 2018.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
RRR
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Finally @Sasanka_of_Gauda can get his parents to arrange a nice bussy for him
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Don't try to tie down a free stallion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Surprised India doesn't have the British article bussy thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We did Supreme Court struck it down as violating right to privacy(which it read into right to life with dignity). Yeah the supreme court can just conjure random rights out of thin air here lmfao.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Didn't read but good luck bhai, i Hope Poland will make such couples recognized by ław top
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2023/01/03/india-same-s*x-marriage-petition-inches-closer
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2023/01/03/india-same-s*x-marriage-petition-inches-closer&run=1 (click to archive)
lead petition:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2022/11/25/same-s*x-marriage-petition-india-supreme-court/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2022/11/25/same-s*x-marriage-petition-india-supreme-court/&run=1 (click to archive)
6 January hearing:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-02/hearings-on-google-fine-and-gay-marriage-reach-india-s-courts
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-02/hearings-on-google-fine-and-gay-marriage-reach-india-s-courts&run=1 (click to archive)
similar hearing in 2021.:
https://web.archive.org/https://www.thepinknews.com/2021/01/07/india-equal-marriage-lgbt-same-s*x-delhi-kavita-arora-ankita-khanna-lgbt/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//www.thepinknews.com/2021/01/07/india-equal-marriage-lgbt-same-s*x-delhi-kavita-arora-ankita-khanna-lgbt/&run=1 (click to archive)
decriminalisation of same-s*x relationships in 2018.:
https://web.archive.org/https://thepinknews.com/2019/09/06/india-gay-s*x-decriminalised-one-year/
ghostarchive.org
https://archive.ph/?url=https%3A//thepinknews.com/2019/09/06/india-gay-s*x-decriminalised-one-year/&run=1 (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context