So a man r*pes a married woman, and the village decides a revenge r*pe is in order. On the surface, I actually don't have too much of a problem with this. Except it's not the male feminist getting r*ped - it's his 14yo sister.
Last week, a young man from a remote village in the eastern Indian state of Jharkhand was accused of sexually assaulting a married woman. To punish him, the village leader reportedly ordered the r*pe of his 14-year-old sister. The husband of the woman who was allegedly assaulted was told to carry out the r*pe.
As the woman's husband dragged the girl to a nearby forest, villagers only looked on, her family told The New York Times.
If they were focused on justice, they would r*pe the male feminist. But the husband obviously isn't interested in bussy. So he r*pes the 14yo loli instead. Also, if a dude is going out raping people's wives, do you think he gives a shit about his sister? He's probably going to r*pe her as well if he hasn't already. There has been 0 punishment enacted on the male feminist, the whole thing probably made him coom.
This shit is apparently normal in these rural villages
It also comes almost exactly a year after a 24-year-old woman was gang-r*ped as punishment for her brother's act of adultery.
A woman tries to explain it, but of course they get it completely wrong because of a lack of understanding of male degeneracy
"If you want to hurt the husband or hurt the father, or hurt the community, then you r*pe the woman to say, 'All right, I'm soiling your goods,' " Krishnan says.
No, they just want to coom. If they wanted to hurt the husband or father, they would inflict violence upon them or r*pe them directly. They r*pe the women because they want to coom, and now they have an excuse to frick a 14yo. It's that simple, frick this complex explanation for obvious coomer behavior.
BIPOCs in prison are more morally justified on this front - you were a libertarian outside? We will r*pe YOUR bussy, not your sisters, mothers, etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is why I've always said r*pe is way worse than murder. There's always a million legitimate reasons to kill someone, so it's always a grey area. R*pe is always done because of some sicko's urges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm getting heavy
@sirpingsalot vibes from this comment
!nooticers
Am I trippin or what. The whole style and comment but especially this part
"This is why I've always said r*pe is way worse than murder... R*pe is always done because of some sicko's urges."
Making it CLEAR he is not a sexual criminal or male feminist or molestor of any kind
then he random pinging of someone with a total topic change out of nowhere....
!illuminati !schizos !schizomaxxxers !stoners
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
is he the guy who stuck his pee pee in nedgimp's veevee?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
that was all fabricated as far as I'm aware the only man she ever had s*x with was me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Sircoomsalot was Redactor all along?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Spread it that rumor around, dont bother verifying!
!nooticers !r-slurs !women !biofoids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The only thing I'm guilty of is hitting the
button. 
As far as I can tell I don't really know anyone involved in this soap opera.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
What could possibly explain this???
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Here the second r*pe very explicitly wasn't done because of some sicko's urges, it was done as punishment. And murder can be done because of some sicko's urges.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I disagree that it was punishment, or at least that was the primary reason. The husband committed adultery. Gang-raping his sister is just coomers making the most of the situation. Why isn't he getting gang-r*ped or just getting the shit beat out of him? It would obviously be the worse punishment. But they don't want bussy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because that would then be a punishment for the hypothetical bussy r*pers, who did nothing wrong (before going along with the child r*pe). Neither did the sister, but your family shares your sins is I guess the idea
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No they just love to r*pe women and girls.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Mussies gonna mussie
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
True I think, but it IS dependent on the revenge male feminist being able to get it up, so a sicko's urges are kind of woven in.
Imagine he just takes her into the woods and says ‘alright I don't wanna do this, let's just pretend' and they both make loads of noise while playing a card game to pass the time.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
huh.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You're forgetting about totally not gay Russian military disciplinary r*pe.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Just because some instances of the category "murder" can have some amount of justification doesn't mean that the category murder is less bad than r*pe.
I think when people say that murder is worse than r*pe, they mean the murder cases that are not at all or only very weekly justified. Most wouldn't condemn the father who murders the libertarian male feminist of son more than the male feminist, or any male feminist.
I'm sure there is a name for this fallacy, otherwise I dub it "Redactor's Fallacy".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I believe you mean "Sheikh Redactor's Fallacy".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
What issues do you have with the Church in the Philippines? You know the bishop's conference has opposed Marcos/Duterte etc, people just don't listen to them.
And being
a common topic of homilies is to treat women with dignity and respect.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are they opposed to Bong Bong?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context