https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1859682871876911310
I'm determined to deliver growth, create wealth and put more money in people’s pockets.
— Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) November 21, 2024
This can only be achieved by working in partnership with leading businesses, like @BlackRock, to capitalise on the UK’s position as a world leading hub for investment. pic.twitter.com/qDPpEYEYAh
Idk wtf is going on over there but I feel like there should be some kind of French revolution where they eat these people's flesh or some shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Labour takeover since corbyn has been amazing. Whats the diffrence between two parties in bongland nowdays? One is pro eu. Other is isnt?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
London and the Red Wall vs Essex and the South.
Immigration "neutral" vs "anti" Immigration
Socially liberaler vs socially liberal with some hanging on social conservatives
Quiet anti-monarchism vs quiet monarchism
Stereotypically (non-financially) middle and lower class vs stereotypical (non-financially) upper class
Liberal "reformers" vs do nothing enjoyers
And (imo somewhat controversially):
Army focused vs Navy focused
You'd have to break into the party coalitions and look at internal factions to really get the key differences.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Basically this? Kinda amazing how there hasnt been any party breakin in big time like chud parties in europe do
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean there have been attempts at explicitly chuddy parties but FPTP cucks them and most of them have meme opinions besides that cause people to seethe and ditch them as well. A chud party would have to be strong enough to outright replace the Tories ala RN (chuds) and LR (generic rightoids) in France.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Chud party needs to be big enough to break stalemate and force parties actually work. Rather then frick around and offload work to civil services
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Literally all Reform had to do was not defend Russia. Bongland is the most fanatically antirussian country that isn't in eastern Europe. And then he went on TV and defended Russia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Reform have a big chance of breaking through next time if the Tories stick with Kemi and Farage stops being such a cuck
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isnt farage us shill
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
The best description I've heard of the differences between the Tories and Labour is this:
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Funfact the record Corbyn loss got around the same amount of votes as the massive win this time. The only difference was that the Tories fell apart. lol fptp
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah. Even at low point corbyn was raking it in with votes. Both pro and anti corbyn.
Funny thing was when after US election. There was redditors saying dont go path of corbyn. Becouse you lose even more. Acting like corbyn wasn't moving things around.
What is it with neoliberal/woke left and their love for not comiting to any policy and just running vibes based nothing ever happen campaings
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Corbyn would have never won
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Because !neolibs are not commies. Why the frick would we want some pinko Chavista apologist and populoid as a UK PM?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I belive what those old cia spooks say. Neolibs are Trotskyist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those are the !neocon
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No. Neocons are zionist
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
1955: Eden wins with 49.7% vs 46.4% for Attlee
2017: May wins with 42.3% vs 40.0% for Corbyn
2024: Starmer '''wins''' with 33.7% vs 23.7% for Sunak (lmao)
The major parties are in terminal decline. From >96% of the vote to barely over half.
We went from Eden vs Attlee to Starmer vs Badenoch, the collapse in talent is undeniable. Soon even FPTP won't be able to bail them out.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Do they disagree on
?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Not really as much as you'd think. I think Starmer sees it as electoral poison and avoids it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Isnt there data from US how harris is for they/them was money best spend by trump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I doubt it. People who cared about
s were never going to vote for Harris.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
All major parties follow the Mumsnet line on trans issues. No one can afford to lose the middle class yummy mummy's.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Conservatives want to implement full state mandated globohomo by 2035
Labour want to implement full state mandated globohomo by 2031 but with more taxes
That's literally the only difference !britbongs
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The conservatives implement gay race communism while complaining about woke while Labour implement gay race communism while celebrating woke
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context