This belief that women are super choosy is often pushed by incels and simply not true, even in this particular study they cite, it shows the opposite.
Does that mean anything? Of course most women date men they consider to be not attractive, they rated 80% of men as sub 5s
To be fair, women tend to put a lot more effort into being attractive than men do.
Guys could try a bit harder.
most women are fat in america so i'm not really sure this is true
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Is there any reason why the women are wrong, or why the distribution of ratings should be normal and centered at 5 in general? If you asked me to rate a large, randomly selected pool of appropriately-aged women, the mean would be well below 5 primarily due to fat people. I think it would be the same for any kind of rating, like if you asked me to rate television shows or movies and gave me a true random sample I think I'd give you something resembling an exponential distribution with a median of zero.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its just uggo cope. Some fat, muscleless, unshaven, mystery meat ethnicity, high mutational load r-slur with a bad haircut who other moids on the incel looksmaxxing communities would (r-slurredly) rate a 1.5 is like,
Moids never willingly go for fat uggos either, they only do it out of desperation and because the peepee is mightier than the brain (and shame)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
the problem is on the male side, the women are rating more-or-less reasonably from their female view. most guys aren't rich so most guys are going to be a 2
men however are all fricking simps who will burst into tears of gratitude if a foid spits on them. they need to face reality and rate all women more accurately
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context