Attractiveness chart posted to Reddit again :marseychartgaussian:


								

								

The mode for guys is 2. It's so over

:marseyitsover:

The same study that said women rate men lower also showed women were more likely to date men they rated lower.

This belief that women are super choosy is often pushed by incels and simply not true, even in this particular study they cite, it shows the opposite.

Does that mean anything? Of course most women date men they consider to be not attractive, they rated 80% of men as sub 5s:marseylemon:

To be fair, women tend to put a lot more effort into being attractive than men do.

Guys could try a bit harder.

most women are fat in america so i'm not really sure this is true

!incels

92
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Any chart that perfect looking is complete BS. I know it's "density" but still, whatever smoothing factor is being used is cranked up way too high. I guess a histogram wouldn't be "beautiful" enough, but if there was any data underneath that mess, it's long been buried.

I guess I'll still believe it though because it agrees with my preconceptions. :marseyreading:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's because the chart isn't a KDE or any kind of smoothed histogram, they just fit a Gaussian to each data set and called it a day.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They should have used gnome

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's complete bullshit, for the one reason that 40% of foids are obese. That means they can't possibly be over a 2. The rest of the data should then be normally distributed, but that 40% spike that should be there is missing. :marseychonkerfoid:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Men are complete simps and will frick anything

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseysoutherner: are very rare son. Men won't lie about a woman's repulsiveness if she isn't in hunting range.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Grandpa, “thiccc” girls are in style now (borderline overweight too overweight women with good fat distribution). Moids are flexible creatures that will automatically do all kinds of mental gymnastics too describe why a woman is frickable. Women do the opposite (hence why they're objectively superior).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

43% of americans are obese (https://www.niddk.nih.gov/health-information/health-statistics/overweight-obesity#:~:text=More%20than%201%20in%203,who%20are%20overweight%20(27.5%25))

The difference is foids have standards while moids will frick anything that moves.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

are le standard deviation charts fake? :marseychartgaussian:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think it's not data, but rather they grabbed a mean and standard deviation from the data and generated a graph from the two numbers

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mollified :#marseyonacid:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah, they probably take the empirical mean and variance of the data and draw the normal distribution with those as parameters.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.