NYT article about hypergamy. They're conclusion? Women caused Donald Trump to happen by doing too well after getting rights and still demanding to marry up.
— bone (@boneGPT) November 30, 2024
Some of my favorite bits of this unintentionally based take 🧵 pic.twitter.com/H6S6agza1K
!chuds !incels turns out putting moids 
(non brown 
or red) at a massive disadvantage and transforming everything from education to work in the eternal foids 
favor caused men to fail out of the system 
left and right!
And yet women 
still refuse 
to date down 
In order to succeed as a Zoomer 
man you have to be born at least a 6/10 and then against all odds succeed in current society 
enough 
to out earn most foids. This doesn't apply to 8/10 =< men, they get to be the modern 
equivalent of a model 
wife. And even if you "make it" with a 4/10 foid, you better 
hope she doesn't bare a son if she wants kids at all and there 
is a 60% chance she will just end up divorce raping you anyway.
Oh well, shut up and pay the tax goy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My Jordan Petersonesque rant:
I think men's dating woes contributing to the Trump victory are overstated and the root problem is being too overlooked. The truth of the matter is that a large portion of our established institutions now skew heavily feminine in disposition and have no intention of fixing this overcorrection and the problems thereof. Male idols and role models, many of whom have done far more good for society than otherwise, are being condemned for relatively minor improprieties and/or being of their time. These feminized institutions offer no message of inspiration to men, other than to "be nice to women and minorities" and to charitably offer them your hopes and dreams. More or less, theyre showing men the Nietzschean Society of the Last Man as the way forward.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To add:
I believe a fair number of feminist intellectuals thought they could render masculinity obsolete, believing it to be the ultimate thorn in a perpetually peaceful existence. I think the extreme safetyism and crab in a bucket nature of feminized institutions prove that they are unsustainable without sufficient masculinity to counter these self-destructive policies. It is for this reason that they are so vulnerable to conquest by strongmen like Elon and Trump.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yes. foids pathologize masculinity
its a problem to be solved
they are ever unaware of the fact the traits they despise are just the other side of a coin. inextricably linked to the positive ones they rely upon.
but they don't even realize just how dependent they are. they literally don't think about the world.
how many foids on the street say sht like "yeah uh we don't need men, kill all men lol".
communism and all that its all an outreach of the feminine mind, taking power.
taking. its all they know. things just exist and some people have more and that's a bad thing
who built those things?? what? you have to make things? nonsense.
foids get and they distribute. food comes from the store, money comes from my job etc.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context