NYT article about hypergamy. They're conclusion? Women caused Donald Trump to happen by doing too well after getting rights and still demanding to marry up.
— bone (@boneGPT) November 30, 2024
Some of my favorite bits of this unintentionally based take 🧵 pic.twitter.com/H6S6agza1K
!chuds !incels turns out putting moids 
(non brown 
or red) at a massive disadvantage and transforming everything from education to work in the eternal foids 
favor caused men to fail out of the system 
left and right!
And yet women 
still refuse 
to date down 
In order to succeed as a Zoomer 
man you have to be born at least a 6/10 and then against all odds succeed in current society 
enough 
to out earn most foids. This doesn't apply to 8/10 =< men, they get to be the modern 
equivalent of a model 
wife. And even if you "make it" with a 4/10 foid, you better 
hope she doesn't bare a son if she wants kids at all and there 
is a 60% chance she will just end up divorce raping you anyway.
Oh well, shut up and pay the tax goy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The problem is that she wanted to focus on the manosphere being bad but the manosphere does not cause women to consistently want a man who makes more money than them even when they make more money than most men. She seems to think she has a slam dunk here:
I'd like to hear her thoughts about what the causes of "women's preferences for providers". I'd be willing to believe it's not 100% biology and there may be some ways to tweak things socially, but I'm not sure if she will like those solutions. At least she's raising some of the actual issues and kind of getting in the right direction. I can't say that about most feminists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context