This is unironically the truth. If you think about how human reproduction works it's not immediately obvious why there should be a 50/50 split of girls to boys born. It would seem better from a reproduction standpoint to have more girls and less boys. The best answer is that men effectively serve as a way to filter out bad genes. It's the men that don't reproduce that are really driving the evolution of humanity forward . The job of women is to be the judge of male fitness, which they generally do pretty well. Punishing a woman for doing her job and identifying an obvious reject is just harming society.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Women are more genocidal/eugenicist than men, change my mind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's a good thing though, uggos shouldn't reproduce
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is unironically the truth. If you think about how human reproduction works it's not immediately obvious why there should be a 50/50 split of girls to boys born. It would seem better from a reproduction standpoint to have more girls and less boys. The best answer is that men effectively serve as a way to filter out bad genes. It's the men that don't reproduce that are really driving the evolution of humanity forward
. The job of women is to be the judge of male fitness, which they generally do pretty well. Punishing a woman for doing her job and identifying an obvious reject is just harming society.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
based but all men are biologically programmed to want to reproduce so good luck convincing them to die out for the good of all mankind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean eugenics is what they've been tasked with by evolution, of course they're more eugenicist than men.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context