We have three holes now with various restrictions on viewing:
/h/masterbaiters β logged-in users only, for gayops
/h/countryclub β 1000 truescore, for whatever you want (but not gayops)
/h/chudrama β 5000 truescore, nothing changed
There is no longer a "Club" toggle. Use /h/countryclub. Keep in mind the truescore limit on club had been *1* for the past couple months, so this is a big upgrade in exclusivity.
This is partially a compromise solution, but it makes the code actually manageable and gives people all of the reasonable asks: masterbaiters gayops won't get outed to Google and loggedoutcels, and countryclub 1000 TS restricts to 10% of all accounts and 30% of weekly active accounts for whatever semi-exclusive crap you want to post.
Addressing frequent suggestions:
"1000 TS is too easy to get, it should be 5000 TS" β The latter is still like 20% of weekly active accounts. The difference isn't as big as you think it is.
"I think Bardfinn has <x> truescore, you should make the limit <x+1>" β Is this Bardfinn in the room with us right now? If you have credible evidence of someone being Bardfinn, modmail us and we'll ban xim, which excludes from the restricted holes. There are people who seem to think Bardfinn has a secret account with over 10β000 truescore. There is no level that will "exclude Bardfinn" in everyone's mind.
"Let us choose whatever arbitrary truescore requirement we want" β This is dumb and you should feel bad for suggesting it. It's an idea with great UX, and it will totally accomplish what you hope it will: I would've posted something if only β₯1050 TS people could see it, but not β₯1000, no sir. You know what we need? More amorphous conditions on who can see what on a site with low-four-digits of active users. (42β069 TS Century Club when?)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
gg I'm glad I don't have to deal with this nonsense
mark me down "for" this change and tell the "against"ers they suck
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context