many thanks to the creators, pls tell me if u dont have the marsey badge
also dont forget to post any future marsey u make here so I can add them https://rdrama.net/post/22479/megathread-posts-here-marseys-or-other
many thanks to the creators, pls tell me if u dont have the marsey badge
also dont forget to post any future marsey u make here so I can add them https://rdrama.net/post/22479/megathread-posts-here-marseys-or-other
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
@Aevann is it intentional that putting height above 250 puts it to a lower value than 250?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It just removes the attribute, and then I guess you see the value computed from the size of the content. I couldn't find a way to replace the value of the attribute with a sanitized value using
bleach
.Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Those sure are words
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
When you post a comment it goes through a sanitizer which decides which tags and attributes to allow. The sanitizer library that rdrama uses allows us to add custom logic besides just checking whitelisted attributes, but this logic must still return a simple yes/no answer to whether the attribute should be allowed. So when you specify width=251 our function says "no", the attribute is removed, your browser computes width as if it were not specified and that's the value smaller than 250 that you see when doing inspect element.
So no this is not "by design" but I for one see zero reasons to put any effort into fixing it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I see, I'm just used to basically every program etc will automatically reduce the value you input to the max allowed value but I have no understanding of the mechanics behind that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah, web applications tend to have this built from sticks and mud quality to them and rdrama (originally ruqqus?) is no exception from what I can tell. In this case it's a definitely good enough approach at least.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have to confess, I always read your name as AnarchoLiberterian and made the assumption that follows.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're not the first one to fall for my intended trick! Now check out my profile pic =)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Hey I recognize that spider! I did look at it but apparently not too closely.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Also btw, this reminded me of my favorite PCM post: https://old.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/d9k62j/every_quadrants_opinion_on_aoc/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
> An actually good joke from PCM
Color me impressed
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
idk lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context