Reported by:

made a new toss

!transphobes

104
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't get it :marseyconfused:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740154347lAwxBSe-VPDTdg.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Can you dumb it down a tad, something's not clicking in my mind

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740156228MhT3FnB1w6s2yg.webp


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17191743323420358.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

First domino is not heavy, it falls over easily and will not topple the others because it doesnt have le significance

https://media.tenor.com/UyfKpZsKWHwAAAAx/puke-nausea.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah he could have done that in his cap at least.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17401564447GZcdkqkKT3psw.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm Bimothy hello :marseywave2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

shut the frick up bimothy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's transphobia, he thinks it's worth to sacrifice trans people, because nothing will go wrong as a result, and he is wrong.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Cardboard hands typed this

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Go back to your groomercord server

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Go back to your groomercord server

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseytrain2:s would make gays eat that pooner-snatch and lesbos suck that girl-peepee. You're a traitor to all gaykind you :marseytrain:-lover.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gays should be thankful that they can frick poon now.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The whole point of being gay is never having to see a disgusting festering girl-hole.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't look at it, just put your peenor in.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's even worse, your whole peepee will be covered in girl-juice.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

as opposed to shit and hiv

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

A guy-juice is noble and pure, a girl-juice is disgusting and impure.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gay rights aren't going away and neither is anything below it but trans rights are flimsy and easily fall over.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Innovative :marseyclapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.giphy.com/media/huyVJYSKcArLiu8J5g/giphy.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

WOAH!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>If women's rights fall then free speech is next

Women are the ones who complain the most about free speech lmao.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Wrong. Free speech inherently is always on the side of women because without women there is no freedom :marseyindignantwoman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More like, without women there's much less speech. Har har har.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Free Love

:#vomit:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseymerchantfoid:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Freedom of Expression and Free Speech are separate things

What did they mean by this? Strikes me as some s*x vs. gender shenanigans that I'm not aware of

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There had to be court cases which established that nonverbal "expression", like wearing a shirt or waving a flag are covered under the first amendment.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stromberg_v._California

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

freedom of expression is probably goth girls vs handmaids :marseygilead:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

s*x vs. gender shenanigans

There are three levels of woke:

  • Zero: s*x and gender are the same and immutable

  • One: s*x and gender are separate, with only gender being mutable (at least with present technology)

  • Two: s*x and gender are kinda separate but both mutable; trans people change their biological s*x

I'm at "one," and I think it's the most defensible. Level "zero" starts falling apart to explain things like kathoey culture. Level "two" is pseudoscience.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Completely wrong. Correct:

Negative One: s*x and gender are the same and immutable

Zero: s*x and gender are separate, with neither of them being mutable, but may not be necessarily the same

One: s*x and gender are separate and s*x is mutable

Two: s*x and gender are the same and immutable. S*x has nothing to do with what genitals you have, or in fact anything material or measurable. If it seems like someone flip-flops between two sexes, in fact whatever s*x they declared themselves to be most recently is the s*x they've always been, and any other s*x they've declared themselves as was a mistake. (So both are mutable in the "we've always been at war with east asia" sense)

Negative one is an indefensible counter-reaction to wokeness. Zero and one are both separately defensible disagreements over how "s*x" is defined, with the one side believing it comes from genetics, the other from genitalia. Two is the presently accepted understanding by progressives.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

One: s*x and gender are separate and s*x is mutable

Wouldn't it be "gender is mutable" instead? Isn't that what the whole point of "gender-fluidity" is?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:!marseytrain:s want people to accept their gender identity unconditionally regardless of anything. In order to not be hypocrites, this forces them to accept the gender identities of r-slurred children who are unknowingly parodying transgenderism in the same way "I identify as an attack helicopter" does. Gender fluidity is not interned into :marseytrain: ideology in any way outside of that, there's no attempt at a theory of how gender fluidity comes about, because everyone knows that it's a stupid larp that makes them all look dumb but can never say as much.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Quite the house of cards

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fair enough on "two," but why did you flip which one is mutable for "one"?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Transgenderism is supposed to be a neurological condition that a person is born with that causes them to have a gender different from their s*x. If gender was mutable, this would be trivially solved: you would change the gender to the one that matches their s*x, and then they would be fixed. This is called "conversion therapy" and is understood to not work. The alternative is to change the s*x (or at least the gender presentation) to match the gender. This is the accepted treatment of transgenderism.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The alternative is to change the s*x (or at least the gender presentation) to match the gender.

I think the semantic gap between us is because there are actually three things in play:

  • A person's biological s*x: basically chromosomes and functional genitalia

  • A person's gender presentation: clothing, prosthetics, cosmetic surgery

  • A person's sense of whether they are a man, woman, etc.

I was defining s*x as the first, gender as the second, and ignoring the third. It seems, when you say, "One: s*x and gender are separate and s*x is mutable," you are ignoring the first, treating the third as someone's "s*x," and then something a bit more complex with the second.

From my understanding, conversion therapy is when someone is pushed to have the second match the first. The "affirming" approach is to encourage changing the second to match the third. I don't think your framework quite captures this distinction.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The different ideologies disagree on the definitions of things, which they use to hide the underlying differences of values. Cons think that people should just put up with whatever mental issues they have in order to look normal. Libs think that people with mental issues should share the load by causing issues for everyone around them while dealing with their issues. If we define s*x as something immutable, then no matter what a :marseytrain: does they can't change their s*x and hence will always be a weirdo. If we define s*x, say, in terms of hormones, then anyone's who's even started transitioning already has (according to us) no meaningful difference from the opposite s*x and therefore can't be excluded from bathrooms, changerooms, brazilian waxes, etc. If we define conversion therapy as just encouraging people to act normal, then it works fine and might help a person put up with being the wrong s*x. If we define it as trying to change a person's underlying sense of what gender they are, then it doesn't work, and in fact causes harm.

Since definitions of words are ultimately arbitrary, the definition that makes the most sense is the one that best aligns with your ideology. Fights over definitions are understood to be fights over the underlying values, since once the definition that makes your opponent look stupid is accepted the battle is basically won.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Fights over definitions are understood to be fights over the underlying values, since once the definition that makes your opponent look stupid is accepted the battle is basically won.

:marsey#clapping:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

K

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah frick you BIPOC

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The difference between saying BIPOC and wearing a ahegao jacket

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

its like how canadians have free thought but not free speech

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17316049351610858.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseynerd3: Pterodactyls are not dinosaurs

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nothing in that comic frame claims that pterodactyls are dinosaurs. It shows a pterodactyl expressing a desire to turn people into dinosaurs.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They are if he says they are, he can make them dinosaur pterodactyls.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@C333 Is this true?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#dinoyes:

It's a pterosaurs not a dinosaur

!dinochads

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseymoreyouknow:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseymindblown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#dinosoypoint:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!nooticers There's a child next to "Free Love" :marseydoomer:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm the guy behind literacy who isn't moving forward.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The biggest offence with the original one is that only trans rights are color coded.

Stinks of bias if you ask me. :marseyshapiro:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if trans rights falls to the left the chain is more safe and nothing bad happens?

this has transphobic implications

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Goddarn that's r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

trolley problem

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nah, I want at least 5 of those dominos to fall

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

All of them but good start

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the trans movement is a parasite on the gay movement. while gays were fighting for their rights, the people who would now be considered trans women were calling them cute twinks and queers while jerking off in their wives' underwear in secret. once gay men solidified some rights for themselves all the crossdressers decided they wanted a piece of that so they can jerk off in their wives' underwear in public, and of course gay guys are expected to take all the fallout after it all goes wrong

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You should move the :marseytrain: to the right side, trying to push the Trans rights block into the others and knock them all down, while the other people try to stop it

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it didn't fall down so this is a pro trans comic.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1740172516-0IOsyyKm0kwyQ.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh I get it. The people have to try to hold up those large cardboard boxes with words print on them while they get filled with bricks. That's a great way to build a set of brick walls!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We had those other things without what they refer to as "trans rights" so this isn't even historically true. The only reason it could start to go in reverse is because the people pushing this stuff have overplayed their hand and deserve a Christian nationalist ethnostate.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.



Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.