Never reading a book written by a modern Marxist ever again

From The Cult of Smart by Freddie DeBoer. I actually like this guy's writing and agree with him on most things, but citing a "breadtuber" (when you could have skipped them and gone directly to the source) is a bridge too far for me. In fact, I googled freddie deboer "breadtube" to try and find a quote from his Substack where he makes fun of them offhandedly, but instead found multiple entire articles written about how retarded "breadtube" is. And yet he cites "Cuck Philosophy" in an actual published book. Mad

123
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187313134796348.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@peepeehands remind you of anyone?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

not me, no woman would willingly be in the same room as me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's so true! You're so self aware :@peepeehandspat:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i may be neurodivergent but im not r-slurred

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Source?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187346744434946.webp

home of the classics:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187346745328252.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1718734674584954.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1718734674669604.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187346747467232.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1718734674584954.webp

sidebar worthy lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Over :marseyitsover: for cutcels

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sneedman will never recover

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

lmao

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

me on the right

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Scott Alexander reviewed this book and gave both positive/negative critiques

https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/book-review-the-cult-of-smart

I've complained about this before, but I can't review this book without returning to it: deBoer's view of meritocracy is bizarre. The overall picture one gets is of Society telling a new college graduate "I see you got all A's in Harvard, which means you have proven yourself a good person. To reward you for your virtue, I grant you the coveted high-paying job of Surgeon." Think I'm exaggerating? He writes (not in this book, from a different article):

Fred:I reject meritocracy because I reject the idea of human deserts. I don't believe that an individual's material conditions should be determined by what he or she “deserves,” no matter the criteria and regardless of the accuracy of the system contrived to measure it. I believe an equal best should be done for all people at all times. More practically, I believe that anything resembling an accurate assessment of what someone deserves is impossible, inevitably drowned in a sea of confounding variables, entrenched advantage, genetic and physiological tendencies, parental influence, peer effects, random chance, and the conditions under which a person labors. To reflect on the immateriality of human deserts is not a denial of choice; it is a denial of self-determination. Reality is indifferent to meritocracy's perceived need to “give people what they deserve.”

At the time, I noted that meritocracy has nothing to do with this. The intuition behind meritocracy is: if your life depends on a difficult surgery, would you prefer the hospital hire a surgeon who aced medical school, or a surgeon who had to complete remedial training to barely scrape by with a C-? If you prefer the former, you're a meritocrat with respect to surgeons.

More meritorious surgeons get richer not because "Society" has selected them to get rich as a reward for virtue, but because individuals pursuing their incentives prefer, all else equal, not to die of botched surgeries. Meritocracy isn't an -ocracy like democracy or autocracy, where people in wigs sit down to frame a constitution and decide how things should work. It's a dubious abstraction over the fact that people prefer to have jobs done well rather than poorly, and use their financial and social clout to make this happen.

:marseyhesright:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know why SA would read a book by a Marxist and be surprised when it has Marxist views on how resources should be allocated. FDB is pretty clear that he thinks jobs should be assigned based on skill and that blank slatism is a lie, he just doesn't like what happens in capitalist societies when reality proves that blank slatism is a lie. You can think its r-slurred but its the result of accepting the exact same bits of true information as SSC readers do but through a Marxist instead of internet neoliberal rationalist lens.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I agree with SA's criticisms but in practice most people arguing for "meritocracy" in, e.g., college admissions (against affirmative action) really do seem to have the view that the Asian kid who works hard and gets As in high school should get to go to Harvard (instead of a black B student) as a reward for his virtue. More generally I think the real "meritocracy" argument (and not the "reward for virtue" argument) against affirmative action in college admissions is a lot harder to make than people seem to think.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the Asian kid who works hard and gets As in high school should get to go to Harvard

Punishing teenagers for being Asian is bad, actually

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Who is being punished? You're presupposing an ex-ante entitlement but my point is you need to justify that entitlement somehow.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your argument is that racial discrimination should be legal because nobody is entitled to college / employment / housing / etc?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why should the Asian student in my example get in instead of the Black student?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Was he rejected for being Asian or is there some other criteria he didn't meet?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They thought the black student would benefit more.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Stalking women might be one of the least offensive things about Freddie tbh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've read a lot of his stuff but only recently, what's the rundown on him?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm not invested enough to try to pull citations but he posted a confession during #metoo and was active in the comments section of /r/redscarepod discussing it :marseyxd:

Dude's bipolar and a leftist, so it would be more newsworthy if he weren't a creep.

@JoyceCarolOates is I think a user from over there maybe they remember more.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

confession during #metoo

:pepewtf:

:!marseysoypoint: limited hang out

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He frequents the rsp and rsp4straggots sub

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, that's pretty dire

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Gonna have to break out an old time favorite in celebration: :marseycuck#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Reading a book citing something called "Cuck philosophy"

Not surprising tbh

:#marseyandmarcus:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

cuck philosophy is my favorite youtuber i watch him every day

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How about you tell me something I don't already know?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:space: :!#speechbubble:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187314064458156.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wonder if he was having a good day

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>he

Yikes :marseydisgusted:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

C'mon

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BE BETTER

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Amazing Atheist is still around

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseys#dotf: :marseyb#anana:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyamazingatheist: 🍌

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I look like this :gigachad: !gayporn

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The handicap symbol is some A+ juxtaposition

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Big joels is worse he legit missed the point of shrek 4 and these ppl talk about media literacy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What does that equality look like?

It looks thin and diabetes free.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Freddie DeBoer, the visionary genius who offered as a solution to the Israel/Palestine conflict, to close down Israel and move all the Jews to America?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironically why not

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't want the Hassids.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's logistically absurd, Israel would never agree to it, and his reasoning and history are inaccurate and/or stupid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Looks like it's going to be another night on the Snorlax for me, wife brought home another man and isn't letting me watch this time."

I mean just looking at this effeminate guy in that curled up position, and then seeing his punk/butch butt wife, I already feel like I know everything I need to know about their "open marriage". I feel like I can be almost certain that he'd be perfectly happy in a monogamous relationship, and she's just a whore that's been railed so many times her brain is incapable of monogamy. He just listens to everything she says, and she can convince him of things even she doesn't believe because she's either more intelligent or better spoken.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Never reading FdB again until he fixes typos and embraces CICO, and also optionally goes off meds

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why embrace CICO when losers will pay for your ozempic so they can read your blog.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No offense, but it sounds like some fricking commie gobbledygook

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That youtuber isn't pro cuck. If you'd done 30 seconds of research you'd see it was a reference to who some 1700's philosopher wrote an entire treatise about cucking. He even changed the name because people were getting confused. The premise of the channel is a phd academic giving digestible lectures on continental philosophy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

on continental philosophy

Opinion ignored. Problem? :marseytroll:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

one could argue the intellectual cucking of continental philosophy is much worse than another man boning your wife

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh I remember a video by this guy being entertaining

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.