'He Loved Us': Pope Francis' new encyclical Dilexit nos on the Sacred Heart of Jesus I'll open with my first impressions having given it a reading with my morning tea: It's great! 
This is by far the most doctrinally clear, Biblically and Traditionally grounded encyclical out of the Pope Francis episcopacy. Not coincidentally, it sticks within a defined theological scope rather than attempting to address hot button social issues (though honestly I wish American Catholics were more keen to submit and obey rather than openly resist). My favorite section is 86-89:
86. Many Jansenists found this difficult to comprehend, for they looked askance on all that was human, affective and corporeal, and so viewed this devotion as distancing us from pure worship of the Most High God. Pius XII described as "false mysticism"[79] the elitist attitude of those groups that saw God as so sublime, separate and distant that they regarded affective expressions of popular piety as dangerous and in need of ecclesiastical oversight.
87. It could be argued that today, in place of Jansenism, we find ourselves before a powerful wave of secularization that seeks to build a world free of God. In our societies, we are also seeing a proliferation of varied forms of religiosity that have nothing to do with a personal relationship with the God of love, but are new manifestations of a disembodied spirituality. I must warn that within the Church too, a baneful Jansenist dualism has re-emerged in new forms. This has gained renewed strength in recent decades, but it is a recrudescence of that Gnosticism which proved so great a spiritual threat in the early centuries of Christianity because it refused to acknowledge the reality of "the salvation of the flesh". For this reason, I turn my gaze to the heart of Christ and I invite all of us to renew our devotion to it. I hope this will also appeal to today's sensitivities and thus help us to confront the dualisms, old and new, to which this devotion offers an effective response.
88. I would add that the heart of Christ also frees us from another kind of dualism found in communities and pastors excessively caught up in external activities, structural reforms that have little to do with the Gospel, obsessive reorganization plans, worldly projects, secular ways of thinking and mandatory programmes. The result is often a Christianity stripped of the tender consolations of faith, the joy of serving others, the fervour of personal commitment to mission, the beauty of knowing Christ and the profound gratitude born of the friendship he offers and the ultimate meaning he gives to our lives. This too is the expression of an illusory and disembodied otherworldliness.
89. Once we succumb to these attitudes, so widespread in our day, we tend to lose all desire to be cured of them. This leads me to propose to the whole Church renewed reflection on the love of Christ represented in his Sacred Heart. For there we find the whole Gospel, a synthesis of the truths of our faith, all that we adore and seek in faith, all that responds to our deepest needs.
For our ESL Catholics like @szrotmistrz you can scroll up and find the translation in your local language, including Portuguese, Polish, Spanish etc. Please join me in reading this. 
For the less interested here is the Vatican News summary.
The text concludes with a prayer, and I ask all !Catholics and !prayerwarriors to join me:
"I ask our Lord Jesus Christ to grant that His Sacred Heart may continue to pour forth the streams of living water that can heal the hurt we have caused, strengthen our ability to love and serve others, and inspire us to journey together towards a just, solidary and fraternal world. Until that day when we will rejoice in celebrating together the banquet of the heavenly kingdom in the presence of the risen Lord, who harmonizes all our differences in the light that radiates perpetually from his open heart. May he be blessed forever" (220).
@JoyceScaryOates
@Paragon
@carpathianHORRORist you neighbors can't escape me by being outside the ping group. Please read this.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah. Francis' main fault is that he tries the pastoral approach to problems, which is great! But as we've seen, too often the media etc. take that approach as "okay he's changing Catholic doctrine on everything and getting liberal like the modern world, hurrah!" This is why he trends liberal, because he thinks of the specific, concrete cases of Jack and Jill who are living together and have a couple of kids but aren't married, and he wants to help bring them back to the Church, so he doesn't want to scare them off with "you are breaking all these rules". However, rules are necessary for the wider Church because otherwise it all becomes "hey, do whatever you want, Jesus loves you the way you are, no need to change a thing".
He has a lot of traditional devotions that are shared by the laity, but which have been undervalued in modern Western practice of the faith. So I'm not surprised he would write about the Sacred Heart, or take a traditional approach.
Benedict is still my pope, though (or was, God rest him).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context