https://rdrama.net/post/317433/marseyjones-marseyjones-marseyjones-legal-bombshell-judge/7335014#context
Reported by:
- DickButtKiss : "facts" aka you made up a bunch of dumb shit and got called out. Stop crying
- CREAMY_DOG_ORGASM : Can you buy me an unban award please
Chuds seethe 
when confronted with facts 
and logic, defend a literal r-slur :marseyvolcanohead: who admitted to lying 
about dead kids 
- 128
- 74
Top Poster of the Day:
911roofer
Current Registered Users: 28,684
Downvoting is banned
Pinging is banned
No posting after curfew
Suggesting that a person's posts are pinned or has not been suspended due to sexual favors is forbidden
Count_Sprpr's word is law
/h/drama SETTINGS /h/drama LOG /h/drama MODS /h/drama EXILEES /h/drama FOLLOWERS /h/drama BLOCKERS
Current software version: 468fded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Alex Jones is not a free speech hero. If you're defending him, you need to think carefully about what you're doing.
US laws make it difficult to actually win a defamation case. It also differentiates between private and public figures. If you want to bash Kamala Harris or Brad Pitt or Donald Trump, it's close to impossible for them to sue you.
It's different for private figures. We don't want a world where the New York Times can say that Joe from Cleveland is engaging in child sacrifice without any evidence and get away with it. This is why Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic kid, was able to get a settlement from CNN after suing them for $275 million.
If you don't think that the Sandmann settlement was a great outrage, then I don't know why you would believe that Alex Jones should be able to get away with outrageous lies that lead to the harassment of the families of kids who were killed in a school shooting.
The decision against Jones was $1.5 billion, which means that each family got less than Nick Sandmann was seeking from CNN. Sandmann certainly got less than that, but it's difficult to argue that what Jones did was not worse than what CNN did to Sandmann or that he wasn't more reckless with the truth. Google the details about what these families went through. Very few of the people denouncing the Jones verdict would've been denouncing a court decision where Sandmann got the full $275 million.
I believe in free speech. I also don't think media companies should be able to tell outrageous lies about private citizens and ruin their lives without consequences. This is true for CNN, and true for Infowars. Neither case involves political persecution. It's the system working like it should.
Alex Jones shouldn't have built an empire based on conspiracy theories and lies. He shouldn't be able to get away with conduct that everyone would agree was outrageous if it was done by the NYT. You discredit the free speech movement when you tie it to a figure like him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Joe is from Family Guy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"Victims' families who sued Jones said they were subjected to years of torment, threats and abuse by people who believed the lies told on his show. One father said conspiracy theorists urinated on his 7-year-old son's grave and threatened to dig up the coffin."
If you're outraged by what happened to Jones, ask yourself if it was CNN or the NYT that was responsible for this, whether your opinion would be different. !nonchuds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I mean yeah it would
Both CNN and NYT are major media outlets that reach tens if not hundreds (forgot millions whoops lol
) of Americans and even more around the world. Infowars is a semi-obscure conspiracytard website that you either have to go out of your way to find or be linked to by schizo friend or family member. I think everyone would agree that had NYT had gone out and said the massacre was fakes just days after and had never recanted, peoples views on Sandy Hook would be extremely more warped than exponentially more than Jones could have hoped for.
Also Jones inherently dramatic and while the fine is also dramatic, it does prevent future happenings from actually happening so it is partially dramaphobic so a true dramatard would be saddened by an end of era
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No more le gay frogs?
!commenters
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the frogs were trans rhe whole time
lol, butt fr tho
!slotsmb100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I heard they added a female frog to the game. "Her name? O'leary. He's a...he's a he?"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
!nonchuds please listen to this r-slur
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
i'm not a straggy nonchud
trans lives matter not
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Please I don't have the dc
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
ask one of them: https://rdrama.net/!nonchuds
no trans lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!nonchuds spherebro wants something
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Thank you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I wouldn't shed a tear if every CNN and NYT spoiled trust fund journ*list/pundit were put into fun camps. I would if Alex Jones did. He's more relatable than classist journ*lists.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
your argument is good on its merits, but you forget that Jones is weak, and has no friends in high places, which is apparently worth an awful lot of money.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
counterpoint: those dead kids were fricking holograms and the fricking parents were fricking clinton shadow operatives and he had PROOF
!schizos
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
He never got $275 million, you stupid
. That's what they were seeking, but the settlement amont was never disclosed. (He got a lot less than $275 million. Probably $1 mil).
!commenters, Mimwee is lying again!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!commenters !nonchuds chud complains about lacking basic reading comprehension. Notice how the sentence he quotes does not, in any way, imply that Sandmann got $275 million, and there are several sentences explicitly stating he didn't
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!commenters I propose a neutral compromise: both of you are cute twinks
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Sold
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I disagree, and I believe we should kill him.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
can you people stop pinging commenters no one cares about yer little sissy fight
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!commenters r*pe this man
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I've been tricked
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nevertheless, he still uses that figure to come to this conclusion.
He is.... a stupid
. 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So the chuds are wrong and chuds are wrong? We've become a mirror image of the wingcucks we mock.
I'm quitting rDrama after this post.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's not his writing, he just copy pasted this tweet.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I am not reading all of that, but the fact I believe at least 50% of it says a lot about society.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
This is like the social network where Fincher edge the audience for 2 hours about how the co founders and best friends became mortal enemies only to show a text on screen at the end saying "they settled"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
He got bussy blasted because that is the way the state's ability to compel works.
People in this country are subject to the rule of law and have to follow it. If you try to make a mockery of the system you will be GAPED by BJC (Big Judicial Peepee).
It is meant to be excessive and a punishment because people are required to follow the law, if you don't they will proceed to chimp out and disobey the law. Especially when they are public figures speaking to a large audience of r-slur proles.
We have follow the rules, right? Just comply. Only BIPOCs don't follow the law, right? White people obey the law, I am assured of this by statueposters on X. Is Alex Jones a BIPOC? Or an Illegal Immigrant? A goddarn queer alien jew lizard man?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
part of the rule of law is disagreeing about the law. The law is actually designed to be bickered over, reassesed, and sometimes even thrown out. Not that it should be thrown out here, just that its dumb to say that people who disagree with a particular ruling arent automatically anti-rule of law especially if they have reasons.
!slotsmb100
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Listen sweaty, if you dont like it, you can move to another country.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not once the court rules or the officer says "you're under arrest", though. He had the opportunity to produce exculpatory information to the court and was like "frick it I'll ignore it"
Bold strategy
Jamal might think he should not be taken into custody for a bench warrant but that's not the way it works
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
courts have ruled in the past that human beings can be considered as slaves/property. Police falsely and innapropriately arrest people all the time. It is part of the rule of law for people to openly disagree with that and in some cases use the rule of law to oppose, or overturn or punish sich things. Again, im not defending jones, im simply saying that people disagreeing with this verdict or any other doesnt make them inherently anti-rule of law as you suggested.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah but Alex Jones isn't John Brown or Thomas Paine
I don't argue that breaking the law sometimes is the moral thing to do, but I don't think Jones would even make that case.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
alex jones and john brown have very similar energy just sayin,
@Bussy-boy
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They both are nutty. I'll admit jones is fricking hilarious though
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Hanania (I can never remember how to spell his name) is right as usual.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not only is suing an individual for 1.5 billion wildly different than a massive corporation but there's no way Sandman was ever paid the whole $275 million so your entire point there is moot.
I will defend Jones on this because it is a gross miscarriage of justice. I don't care if you think he's a shitty free speech advocate or not.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Mimwee, normally I would agree with you about Jones deserving it but you said it in a mean way
so I can only ask why aren't you supporting the victims of Sandy Hook? 
since the families themselves said were shocked by the verdict and have recently reached out to Jones, while still condemning him, to drop the $1.5 billion to $85 million. They too think it was extreme.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I want to titty frick Alex Jones
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
But you liked Alex Jones Mimwee?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context