Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Reported by:
  • DickButtKiss : He is a righteous free speech warrior mon. Are you and homocracy and August all the same person?

Alex Jones is not a free speech hero. If you're defending him, you need to think carefully about what you're doing.

US laws make it difficult to actually win a defamation case. It also differentiates between private and public figures. If you want to bash Kamala Harris or Brad Pitt or Donald Trump, it's close to impossible for them to sue you.

It's different for private figures. We don't want a world where the New York Times can say that Joe from Cleveland is engaging in child sacrifice without any evidence and get away with it. This is why Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic kid, was able to get a settlement from CNN after suing them for $275 million.

If you don't think that the Sandmann settlement was a great outrage, then I don't know why you would believe that Alex Jones should be able to get away with outrageous lies that lead to the harassment of the families of kids who were killed in a school shooting.

The decision against Jones was $1.5 billion, which means that each family got less than Nick Sandmann was seeking from CNN. Sandmann certainly got less than that, but it's difficult to argue that what Jones did was not worse than what CNN did to Sandmann or that he wasn't more reckless with the truth. Google the details about what these families went through. Very few of the people denouncing the Jones verdict would've been denouncing a court decision where Sandmann got the full $275 million.

I believe in free speech. I also don't think media companies should be able to tell outrageous lies about private citizens and ruin their lives without consequences. This is true for CNN, and true for Infowars. Neither case involves political persecution. It's the system working like it should.

Alex Jones shouldn't have built an empire based on conspiracy theories and lies. He shouldn't be able to get away with conduct that everyone would agree was outrageous if it was done by the NYT. You discredit the free speech movement when you tie it to a figure like him.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic kid, was able to get a settlement from CNN after suing them for $275 million.

He never got $275 million, you stupid :faggot:. That's what they were seeking, but the settlement amont was never disclosed. (He got a lot less than $275 million. Probably $1 mil).

!commenters, Mimwee is lying again! :marseyfacepalm:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is why Nick Sandmann, the Covington Catholic kid, was able to get a settlement from CNN after suing them for $275 million. [...] Sandmann certainly got less than that, [...] Very few of the people denouncing the Jones verdict would've been denouncing a court decision where Sandmann got the full $275 million.

!commenters !nonchuds chud complains about lacking basic reading comprehension. Notice how the sentence he quotes does not, in any way, imply that Sandmann got $275 million, and there are several sentences explicitly stating he didn't

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commenters I propose a neutral compromise: both of you are cute twinks

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sold

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycryingfast:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I disagree, and I believe we should kill him. :#marseyindignant:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

can you people stop pinging commenters no one cares about yer little sissy fight

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!commenters r*pe this man

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#hump: :#marseyeldritchnut:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've been tricked :platynooo:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17317700285907505.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:scoot:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseyevilgrin: :#rape:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The decision against Jones was $1.5 billion, which means that each family got less than Nick Sandmann was seeking from CNN.

Nevertheless, he still uses that figure to come to this conclusion.

He is.... a stupid :faggot:. :marseyshapiro:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

So the chuds are wrong and chuds are wrong? We've become a mirror image of the wingcucks we mock.

I'm quitting rDrama after this post. :marseycontemplatesuicide:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's not his writing, he just copy pasted this tweet.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Hanania is a stupid :faggot:

:#marseymindblown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I am not reading all of that, but the fact I believe at least 50% of it says a lot about society.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This is like the social network where Fincher edge the audience for 2 hours about how the co founders and best friends became mortal enemies only to show a text on screen at the end saying "they settled"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Victims' families who sued Jones said they were subjected to years of torment, threats and abuse by people who believed the lies told on his show. One father said conspiracy theorists urinated on his 7-year-old son's grave and threatened to dig up the coffin."

If you're outraged by what happened to Jones, ask yourself if it was CNN or the NYT that was responsible for this, whether your opinion would be different. !nonchuds

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17316618911184695.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If you're outraged by what happened to Jones, ask yourself if it was CNN or the NYT that was responsible for this, whether your opinion would be different.

I mean yeah it would :marseyshrug:

Both CNN and NYT are major media outlets that reach tens if not hundreds (forgot millions whoops lol :marseyantiwork2:) of Americans and even more around the world. Infowars is a semi-obscure conspiracytard website that you either have to go out of your way to find or be linked to by schizo friend or family member. I think everyone would agree that had NYT had gone out and said the massacre was fakes just days after and had never recanted, peoples views on Sandy Hook would be extremely more warped than exponentially more than Jones could have hoped for.

Also Jones inherently dramatic and while the fine is also dramatic, it does prevent future happenings from actually happening so it is partially dramaphobic so a true dramatard would be saddened by an end of era :marseytears:

@X ping non chuds for me please :marseypoor:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No more le gay frogs?

https://media.tenor.com/GNAQm8mZEPgAAAAx/oppenheimer-cillian-murphy.webp

!commenters

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

the frogs were trans rhe whole time :marseytransattentionseeker:

lol, butt fr tho

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I heard they added a female frog to the game. "Her name? O'leary. He's a...he's a he?"

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!nonchuds please listen to this r-slur

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Thank you :@cyberdicklove::@cyberdicklove::@cyberdicklove:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

i'm not a straggy nonchud :marseyindignant:

trans lives matter not

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Please I don't have the dc :soycry:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://media.tenor.com/aghZBIhKFYcAAAAx/brofist-i-got-you.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

ask one of them: https://rdrama.net/!nonchuds :marseyindignant:

no trans lives matter

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@ULTRANIGMATIC-MEGAVAMPIRE i need funds for a non-chuds ping :marseybegging:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

!nonchuds spherebro wants something

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

No

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

Thank you :@ultranigmatic-megavampirelove::@ultranigmatic-megavampirelove::@ultranigmatic-megavampirelove:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I wouldn't shed a tear if every CNN and NYT spoiled trust fund journ*list/pundit were put into fun camps. I would if Alex Jones did. He's more relatable than classist journ*lists.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

your argument is good on its merits, but you forget that Jones is weak, and has no friends in high places, which is apparently worth an awful lot of money.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1691152552869678.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

counterpoint: those dead kids were fricking holograms and the fricking parents were fricking clinton shadow operatives and he had PROOF

!schizos

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He got bussy blasted because that is the way the state's ability to compel works.

People in this country are subject to the rule of law and have to follow it. If you try to make a mockery of the system you will be GAPED by BJC (Big Judicial Peepee).

It is meant to be excessive and a punishment because people are required to follow the law, if you don't they will proceed to chimp out and disobey the law. Especially when they are public figures speaking to a large audience of r-slur proles.

We have follow the rules, right? Just comply. Only BIPOCs don't follow the law, right? White people obey the law, I am assured of this by statueposters on X. Is Alex Jones a BIPOC? Or an Illegal Immigrant? A goddarn queer alien jew lizard man?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

part of the rule of law is disagreeing about the law. The law is actually designed to be bickered over, reassesed, and sometimes even thrown out. Not that it should be thrown out here, just that its dumb to say that people who disagree with a particular ruling arent automatically anti-rule of law especially if they have reasons.

!slotsmb100

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Listen sweaty, if you dont like it, you can move to another country.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not once the court rules or the officer says "you're under arrest", though. He had the opportunity to produce exculpatory information to the court and was like "frick it I'll ignore it"

Bold strategy

Jamal might think he should not be taken into custody for a bench warrant but that's not the way it works

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

courts have ruled in the past that human beings can be considered as slaves/property. Police falsely and innapropriately arrest people all the time. It is part of the rule of law for people to openly disagree with that and in some cases use the rule of law to oppose, or overturn or punish sich things. Again, im not defending jones, im simply saying that people disagreeing with this verdict or any other doesnt make them inherently anti-rule of law as you suggested.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah but Alex Jones isn't John Brown or Thomas Paine

I don't argue that breaking the law sometimes is the moral thing to do, but I don't think Jones would even make that case.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

alex jones and john brown have very similar energy just sayin, @Bussy-boy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They both are nutty. I'll admit jones is fricking hilarious though :trollolol:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hanania (I can never remember how to spell his name) is right as usual.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not only is suing an individual for 1.5 billion wildly different than a massive corporation but there's no way Sandman was ever paid the whole $275 million so your entire point there is moot.

I will defend Jones on this because it is a gross miscarriage of justice. I don't care if you think he's a shitty free speech advocate or not.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Mimwee, normally I would agree with you about Jones deserving it but you said it in a mean way :!marseyindignant: so I can only ask why aren't you supporting the victims of Sandy Hook? :marseysad: since the families themselves said were shocked by the verdict and have recently reached out to Jones, while still condemning him, to drop the $1.5 billion to $85 million. They too think it was extreme.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Joe is from Family Guy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I want to titty frick Alex Jones

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

But you liked Alex Jones Mimwee? :marseysad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.