Unable to load image

EFFORTPOST Snapshots of the Lebanese Civil War - Shi'a Militias

This is the third part of a series where I look at what the situation was for each faction in the Lebanese Civil War every 5 years. It's not meant to cover all the important events of the war, but just to show you how much the fortunes of a person or group could change in so little time.

Part 1: Syria

Part 2: Christian Militias

It was much harder to write about the Shi'a militias as they remain somewhat mysterious. There is abundant sources in English for all the minutiae of what the Christians were up to, but most people who write in English don't know or don't care about the Shi'a. It's even more difficult since Hezbollah was so good at keeping secrets. We still don't know for sure how they were organized, who was really leading them, or how they made decisions. I've also had to greatly simplify some things that were just too complicated to explain, like how the Shi'a and Palestinians interacted. Finding photos was even harder than the research, partly because search engines suck so much these days. I had to translate my search terms into Arabic just to find anything that didn't have a Getty Images watermark. :marseyunamused:

I repeat my cavaet before that this is about Shi'a organizations, not all Shi'a people. Many of them joined other groups of all kinds: the Lebanese army, Fatah, the SSNP, the Communist Party, the South Lebanon Army. Most had nothing to do with the militias at all.

1975

While the Palestinians and Maronites were training for the impending war, the Shi'a were much less militant. They lived mostly in the Bekaa valley and the south, far from the struggles going on in Beirut. Politics was left to the feudal landowners who dominated rural society. In 1975 their political awakening was just beginning. The charismatic Iranian-born Imam Musa al-Sadr had founded a movement to demand better treatment for the poor who never benefited from all the wealth passing through Beirut. As war broke out he formed his own militia, Amal. Sadr wanted change in Lebanon, but he was not a radical like the leftist Druze leader Kamal Joumblatt. During the intense fighting of 1975-1976 Amal did some fighting against the Lebanese Forces but Sadr kept them out of the action for the most part.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672297875905.webp

Children in Akkar on their way to fill up water from a well, July 1967. source

Sadr was unique among the faction leaders. Unlike the Maronite and Palestinian warlords he didn't shake down the population in his area for protection money. He sponsored the construction of schools and hospitals in the deprived regions of the country. He was widely respected outside of his own sect as a man who truly wanted to ease the burden of all the oppressed in Lebanon, no matter their sect. Somehow he managed to maintain close relationships with both the Iranian exiles plotting to overthrow the Shah and the Shah's secret police. Iran, flush with cash from booming oil prices, sent money to help Sadr in his charitable works. If there was one person in Lebanon who had the political and military power, the foreign contacts, and the temperament to bring the warring factions together and make peace, it was Musa al-Sadr.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672299891102.webp

Musa al-Sadr hanging out with his bros, the oppressed peoples of Lebanon.

1980

By 1980 Sadr was dead. On a trip to ask Arab leaders for help during Israel's raid in 1978 he arrived in Libya and was never heard from again, undoubtedly killed by Ghaddafi. His successors Hussein el-Husseini (yes, that's his real name) and Nabih Berri were shrewd but did not have the gravitas of Sadr.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672303145142.webp

In America they anglicized their name to Berry. I think raspberries are my favorite. They're so easy to grow.

The south was in crisis. Palestinian guerillas from a dozen different factions roamed freely with heavy weapons, oppressing the Shi'a population worse than the government ever had. Their terrorist raids into Israel provoked the Israelis to bomb and shell the border areas. In 1978 a major IDF raid swept over the border area, displacing around 200,000 people. They had nowhere to go except the slums sprouting up in the south of Beirut. Amal was building up its militia but it was in no shape to take on the Palestinians.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672305709233.webp

Kataeb militia in the the Maronite village Klea on the border. There was a large Christian minority in the south living in scattered villages. They fought for both sides in large numbers.

Meanwhile huge events were happening in Iran. The Shah was overthrown and replaced by Khomeini's revolutionaries, many of whom had been associates of Musa al-Sadr. The new regime kept sending aid to Amal, but some cracks were developing in Shi'a solidarity. Many members of Amal were inspired by the Iranian Revolution and wanted to emulate it. Amal's leaders were not so hot-headed and understood that they could no more build a Shi'a theocracy in Lebanon than they could on the moon. Nabih Berri came from an entirely different world from these rural fanatics. He was well versed in modern society, even working for General Motors in Dearborn for a time. This disconnect between the secular side of Amal and the devout revolutionary side would only deepen over time.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672312001307.webp

Ayatollah Khomeini having a nice little chortle. He actually smiled but there was some kind of unwritten rule among Western journos that you could only ever show pictures of him scowling. :marseyexcited:

1985

The cracks emerging in Amal had burst open by 1985. The fanatical elements of Amal had broken away to form Hezbollah. Some Shi'a who had been fighting for Palestinian groups also joined. While Amal's patron was Syria, Hezbollah was armed and trained by Syria's ally Iran. It was an awkward situation as the two rival groups in Lebanon were supposed to get along with each other like their patrons did. Hezbollah during this period was notorious around the world for their suicide bombings. Other groups used suicide bombers, even Christian ones (the SSNP), but Hezbollah stunned the world with devastating attacks against the US Marines and French, the US Embassy, another US Embassy building, and the Israeli headquarters in Tyre. They also began taking hostages, any Westerner they could no matter how innocent they were. Syria was not pleased as it did not want to bring down the wrath of America, especially when these terrorist attacks served more to serve Iran's interests than bring victory in Lebanon.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1717667231266981.webp

Survivors search the ruins of the US Marine barracks where 241 men were killed by a single suicide bomber.

The Israeli invasion of 1982 was not immediately opposed by the Shi'a of the south. Some even welcomed them as liberators come to drive out the Palestinians who had been tormenting them. But instead of cultivating them as potential allies, the Israelis treated them like a conquered enemy. Tensions rose, the Israelis began assassinating local imams, and a guerilla war soon broke out with both Hezbollah and Amal fighting the occupation forces. By 1985 the Israelis were in the process of withdrawing to their "security zone", a strip of land along the border, but the war would continue.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672323741732.webp

The most important event for the Arab world in 1982: Algeria beat West Germany at the World Cup! :marseyletsgo:

Amal was now the largest militia in the nation. The invasion had driven even more refugees into Beirut and, desperate for money, they were easy to recruit. Several small militias had disbanded during the Israeli occupation and now many of the survivors joined Amal. The rapid expansion of the militia made it one of the most powerful forces in Lebanon but also lead to discipline problems as men from different backgrounds with different motives were hired. Weapons and ammunition flowed in from Syria, including a lot of artillery.

When Syria made an effort to bring together all the sects to make peace in 1985 (the "Tripartite Pact"), he brought in Amal, the Druze, and the Lebanese Forces. By now the militia was not just recognized as representing the Shi'a, but as one of the most powerful factions in the nation.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672326021137.webp

A mother tries to get her children to safety as the Syrians and their allies attack the Shatila refugee camp yet again. This massacre never caught the attention of Western media because it happened bit by bit over years.

Amal had always been friendly with Assad's regime but now it had practically become an extension of it. Berri was forced to do Syria's dirty work, joining with other Syrian-dominated groups to besiege the remaining Palestinian refugee camps in Beirut (the "War of the Camps". Fighting continued on and off for years as Assad was determined to not let Fatah ever use the camps as bases again.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672329305513.webp

Civilians evacuate Shatila with the help of the Red Cross, 1987.

Despite its relationship with Syria, Amal also tried to get along with Western powers. Hezbollah's kidnappings put them in a difficult position. Amal's failure to rescue them could be interpreted as either protecting Hezbollah or, even worse for their image, that they were not really in control of the chaos in West Beirut. They used the US as a conduit to indirectly negotiate with the Israelis and try to reduce the level of violence in south Lebanon where both Amal and Hezbollah were carrying out guerilla attacks on the Israeli troops remaining in the border zone.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672331997712.webp

Terry Waite on his way to negotiate with Hezbollah for the release of the hostages. They took him hostage too. He spent 4 years in solitary.

1990

Amal was now no longer a top-tier military power on the same level as Hezbollah and the Lebanese Forces. They had suffered badly in clashes with the Druze in West Beirut ("The War of the Flag") followed by the inevitable clash with Hezbollah, the "War of Brothers". Their militia was large but bloated with troops who were inexperienced and poorly motivated. They were no match for Hezbollah's troops, who were trained intensively by the Iranian Revolutionary Guards at bases in the Bekaa Valley. The war lasted on and off into 1990 with countless temporary cease-fires. Amal put up a good fight in the beginning but Hezbollah gradually gained the upper hand. By the end of the struggle, Amal was in terrible shape. Iran could afford to pay its proxy troops far more than impoverished Syria, so many Amal fighters defected to Hezbollah. In both of these wars, Amal had to be rescued by Syrian military intervention, making them even more dependent.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672337461758.webp

Amal militiamen, 1980s. source

While Amal's military power was cut down drastically by these defeats, it remained an important player in politics. Hezbollah was hampered by its mission to spread the Iranian Revolution. Most Shi'a were not interested in Ayatollah Khomeini's strange new form of Islam. His vision may have appealed to many rural Iranians but it was less compelling to Arabs who had lived side by side with other religions for countless generations. The idea of establishing a theocratic state where 2/3 of the population weren't even in the same sect was ludicrous, and even if it had been possible most Shi'a would not have wanted it. Hezbollah won on the battlefield but still lost the vote.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672339344018.webp

Iran banned these bloody rituals done on Ashura. Hezbollah followed their lead and stopped but many Shi'a Lebanese did not.

:marseyselfflagellatio#n:

Hezbollah's military power and the skill of Amal's envoys gave the Shi'a an important seat at Taif where the final settlement of the war was negotiated. At first glance, the agreement doesn't seem to do much for the Shi'a, but there was one important change. Power was shifted from the president to the cabinet, which needed a quorum of 2/3 of its members to do business. In practice, about 1/3 of the cabinet will represent Shi'a parties, so if they have a few allies they can effectively veto anything that the government wants to do by just not showing up.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672341627426.webp

If you google "amal" you get pages and pages of Amal Clooney. But she's kind of r-slurred so I decided to post Salma Hayek instead.

Hezbollah had a unique position after the peace agreement. Their war wasn't over yet. They still had to drive out the Israelis. While all the other militias were disarmed, Hezbollah was allowed to keep their weapons.

Epilogue

Amal and Hezbollah mended their differences and as the "Shiite Duo" they now cooperate closely. Hezbollah does the bulk of the fighting while Nabih Berri of Amal, a master at patronage and manipulation, handles the parliament. By not attending cabinet meetings they are able to block the government from doing anything they disapprove of. Unfortunately this means nothing ever gets done. The government is completely paralyzed and unable to deal with the many crises that have hit the country in recent years.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176672343526042.webp

Hezbollah troops celebrating on the day of Israel's evacuation.

Hezbollah did in fact use its weapons to great effect over the next 10 years. In the late 1990s Iran began supplying them with antitank missiles. At the same time, Hezbollah managed to thoroughly infiltrate the SLA (Israel's puppet army on the border) and kill or capture key leaders. The Israelis were reduced to cowering in their bunkers. In 2000 the decision was finally made to pull the plug. Without even waiting for the day they had planned to leave, the IDF abruptly abandoned their positions and headed home. Hezbollah had won. The purpose for which it was created had been fulfilled. This would have been a great time for them to lay down their guns or integrate themselves into the national army. But of course nobody puts their guns down when they're on a winning streak. Hezbollah now has come full circle, shooting across the border into Israel and triggering devastating retaliation just like the Palestinians had when they ruled the south.

96
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The West Bank is split into three zones of control, Area A, Area B, and Area C. Area A is total PLO control, Area B is shared control between Israel and PLO, and Area C is total Israeli control(this is also where the settlements are). Everyone agrees that land swaps will be part of the final peace deal between Israel and Palestine due to the realities on the ground, namely Israeli settlements and that it was never meant to be a permanent border but the accusations is that Israel is trying to achieve victory through settlements. The Oslo Accord was intended to slowly transition control to exclusive PLO control but that's been backsliding for obvious reasons.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176842133579366.webp

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17176842145942879.webp

I believe what sheikh @Redactor0 is saying is that red line built to stop suicide bombers was built within the West Bank around settlements which serves to indicate Israeli intent for annexation of those settlements. The barrier itself isn't really controversial, just the areas where it deviates from the 1967 border. It's often viewed as proof of Israeli intent to force peace terms on the world by creating a reality on the ground in which Israel gets the most land with the least Palestinians.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, but the areas under Israeli control aren't the ones exhibiting the traits that Redactor0 leverages to declare "apartheid." The people in the settlements and on that side aren't the ones excluded from Israeli society. The people excluded are the ones on the other side, which is also not land Israel claims or exepcts.

There is no land Israel claims sovereignty over that operates on an an apartheid regime.

Redactor0's position isn't coherent even when you analyze the detailed areas and claims of the West Bank.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

@Redactor0 would you say this is a fair characterization of your position

I believe that it relates to Trump's peace proposal and concerns whether a Palestinian state with that much of Area C annexed and with those security concessions would be viable or permanently dependent on Israel

https://i.rdrama.net/images/171769442477104.webp

The allegations of Apartheid are typically that Israel is acting arbitrarily with security checkpoints and home destruction to compel Palestinians from Area C into Areas A and B, with accusations that this is similar to the Apartheid South African bantustans.

Obviously a chief difference between Apartheid South Africa and Israel is that citizenship isn't inherently racial with many Arabs having Israeli citizenship and the absence of these measures within Israel proper which is why allegations are traditionally narrowly on the West Bank. There's also the fact that Palestinians want a separate state as stated by the internationally recognized representative of Palestinians the PLO so this is citizens of an occupying power settling within an occupied territory of another state.

The solution would be a negotiated end to the occupation and land swaps which would allow Israel to guarantee it's own security while Palestine remains an economically and politically viable state.

This is roughly the UN consensus at the moment plus or minus some rhetoric around the designation of Apartheid and characterization of Israel's actions as cynical or justified measures to maintain security so it's not an uncommon position. Obviously this entire thing would be contingent on the PLO being able to tardwrangle Palestinians and themselves into following any agreement.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There's also the fact that Palestinians want a separate state as stated by the internationally recognized representative of Palestinians the PLO so this is citizens of an occupying power settling within an occupied territory of another state.

(emphasis mine)

Y'all really struggle with the is/ought distinction. Wanting is not having, and wanting does not create the same moral and ethical conditions as having.

If Palestinians want sovereignty, they will have to accept it under terms where Israel maintains its own. Displacing all Jews from Arab nations and then rejecting the UN partition came with consequences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

If Palestinians want sovereignty, they will have to accept it under terms where Israel maintains its own

or they can keep kicking israeli butt with the help of Hezbollah and Iran

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Iran will be nuked before Israel yields sovereignty.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

if Iran gets nuked israel gets wiped out of the face of the earth, sounds like a good trade for me

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Aww, are they gonna send some more drones to get shot down over Jordan? Some more strong words and money for Hezbollah to trade fire?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They will nuke israel back

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

The allegations of Apartheid are typically that Israel is acting arbitrarily with security checkpoints and home destruction to compel Palestinians from Area C into Areas A and B, with accusations that this is similar to the Apartheid South African bantustans.

Yeah. They've got it divided up already with Israeli-controlled roads going through it, chopping the Palestinian territory up into little pieces so it can't be a viable state. This isn't a conspiracy theory or my opinion, it's what the settlers openly say they're trying to do and the Israeli government lets them.

So in the end you get a bunch of small Palestinian enclaves where they don't have the rights of Israeli citizens but they have to go into the settlements every day to work. It's a win-win for the settlers. The Palestinians have to work for them and have to stay in their bantustan the rest of the day.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

look im gunna have 2 ask u 2 keep ur giant dumps in the potty not in my replys 😷😷😷

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I believe what sheikh @Redactor0 is saying is that red line built to stop suicide bombers was built within the West Bank around settlements which serves to indicate Israeli intent for annexation of those settlements.

:marseyhesright:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Considering the jewish chads are literally trying to send them our way that's exactly what they're doing

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.