https://rdrama.net/h/vidya/post/298623/youre-not-playing-any-of-these/6989597#context
!lgbt !cuteandvalid !cuteandinvalid !historychads okay but whos right here i have to know
white extinction is long overdue
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I have tried to respond to every single one of your points in detail, while you dismissed my points, and you still don't admit that it's not true that it was made up by some gay agenda in the 1970s
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was made up AND it was promoted heavily by the gay community. I messed up that it was two separate things but goddarn. you are such a goddarn redditor. All you do is go ummm source... source... do you have a source??? Then weasel out of it when given one. Go back to /r/askgaybros or where ever you come from
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It was promoted by the gay community, absolutely. It's also true that a certain narrative, not exactly accurate, formed out of this. But no, the texts about the Sacred Band were not made up, and it's not a new historiographical view
When did I do this?
You mean, when you quoted a secondary source that I am well aware of, as if Leitao is some unimpeachable authority? That I didn't even deny revisionary thought exists re. Sacred Band? This secondary source that, let me paraphrase what you said as a figure of speech, is "googled shit[sic] that agrees with you"? Unlike my literal primary sources? Lol there are plenty of articles which state otherwise, and which disagree with eg. Leitao.
We're not on Reddit anymore
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh, I think I get it. You mean, when you quoted a secondary source that I am well aware of, as if Leitao is some unimpeachable authority? That I didn't even deny revisionary thought exists re. Sacred Band? This secondary source that, let me paraphrase what you said as a figure of speech, is "googled shit[sic] that agrees with you"? Unlike my literal primary sources? Lol there are plenty of articles which state otherwise, and which disagree with eg. Leitao.
OK, here's a secondary source that disagrees with you (but again, I didn't even take a strong position on this, I just wanted to show it is quite reasonable to conclude re. the Sacred Band, and it's absurd to deny any kind of military homosexual practice in classical Greece):
-Cartledge, Paul. (2020). Thebes- The Forgotten City of Ancient Greece.
(nota benes added by me obviously)
OK... what now?
Do you want to make a point, or say that everything cited by me is googled shit[sic] searched for only by the criteria of compliance, whilst yours isn't, or what?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context