Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They're both wrong.

I dunno if the Sacred Band really were gay or whatever, that's not a period I'm particularly knowledgeable about. But at least the story of them being gay goes back to ancient times. Maybe it originally was like "these bros totally loved each other" but it really seems that pretty soon it was understood to be sexual.

:marseydisagree:

On the other hand, this isn't evidence for gay s*x among Greek soldiers to be common. It's evidence that this was considered unusual and noteworthy, maybe even a little titillating. For example, Plutarch isn't writing about normal people doing normal things. He's writing exaggerated caricatures of exceptional people doing exceptional things.

:marseydisagree:

The true, centrist answers to these questions:

:marseygrilling2:

It was not common for Greek soldiers to bugger each other, but it was not considered incredibly shocking that they sometimes did.

The myth of all Greeks being gay was not invented by a conspiracy of homos in the 1970s. It was invented by a conspiracy of homos in the late 1800s. British academia and the Anglican church it was intricately tied to were dominated by gays. They were pulling the strings behind the scenes, but there was still a "don't ask, don't tell" policy where you couldn't just announce it openly. So they saw in the classical languages an opportunity to let themselves go wild. They could write whatever they wanted about buttfricking each other as long as it was in a Greek or (more commonly at the time) Latin poem. The common people had a pretty good idea what was going on but were okay with it as long as they didn't have to find out the details. When the homostocracy went too far and got out of line, like in the telegraph boys scandal or the Oscar Wilde situation they would get slapped back, but classical studies remained their turf. Since everything in the field believed in the 1800s pretty much became written in stone, we're still living the consequences of that today.

As the capy-appointed Official Historian of rDrama, I declare this to be the unquestionable truth.

:#marseyjudge:

!historychads

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The type of homosexuality being promoted by the church was classical pederasty that they still practice to this day but the idea that they practiced modern homosexuality was made up in the 70s. Otherwise you are 100% correct.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

is it hard to ask men not to r*pe boys?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tbf im pretty sure in Ancient Greece that statutory r*pe didnt exist so im sure some of it was considered consensual

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes :marseyfeminist:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17238973634696946.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Enjoy being exiled, longie. :marseywave2:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marseycopeseethedilate:

@Aevann make an exception for LPB

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

exiles dont work on LPB lol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I kneel :#marseybowing:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yes, sexual degeneracy came often as a result of bursts of societal development :marseyshrug: But it was short.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I didn't realize how much buggery went on back in the day, that's very interesting.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Don't feel so out of place :marseyminipixel: now?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It wasn't a lot lol, it was in a few very isolated places.

But those who sought to do evil acts often congregated around sources of inherent good.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Tldr?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Peepeees were present. They were not used for reproductive purposes. Sad!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Everything everywhere all at once.

:marseyyesandno:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#soysnoo5: reddit the movie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Imagine being such a butthurt contrarian that you decide if a movie is bad based on whether redditors like it. I bet you don't like kittens and puppies either. :marseysmug3:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

yeah it would be more fair and more accurate to call it what it is, chink rick and morty the movie

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah, I'd agree, that's the genre that it's in. But it's way, way better than Rick & Morty.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

consider this:

boring slop characters, but they are in le wacky bread dimension, where they are bread! now they are in le wacky bubbles dimension, with bubbles! here's some jangling keys!

if you enjoyed this, consider also trying cocomelon and yo gabba gabba

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Consider :marseygigathonk: this

https://media.tenor.com/gzCVp3K5-acAAAAx/spider-man.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You might try not being massive cute twink? :marseyshrug:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

BIPOC please. You know exactly what genre of that movie is and redditors liking good movies isn't an impossibility.

I've only ever heard irl people call this movie mid/trash/boring/pseud nonsense.

It's only online that creatures like redditors jerk off to it

And just because this movie has chinks/gooks in it, doesn't mean you have to like it lmao. Cool it with the yellow fever neighbor

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don't know where the idea comes from that it has to convey more wisdom than Jesus in order to be a good movie. Nothing else gets held up to that same standard. It's like Israel: Anyone who likes it or hates it too much is a weirdo.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Factcheck: This claim is 100% true.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.