Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

replace the wojak women with :#chadwomannordic: , post to .win communities and see what happens :#trollsus:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I find it funny when basement dwelling moids:marseyneckbeard: say s*x dolls will replace women like women should be mad. Dysgenic men will be sexually satisfied and stop harassing women? How is that bad? :marseyxd:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I fully expect society to return to polygamy, in the one-chad-with-five-wives form. For one generation, it will be utopian, as the bottom 80% of scrotes will descend into their basements and never reproduce. However, the sons of the chads that do reproduce will not be happy, as now rather than having the bottom 80% of men who don't get to marry be gross incels, they're chads, and will thus take violent retribution against the society they perceive to be denying them women.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Keep in mind shitty foid genetics also make incels, so not all of them will be chads.

And those incels would just plug themselves into the sexbots and VR copes like the last generation of incels in this scenario.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Right now, under 80-20/AFBB theory, a woman can rely on the pressure exerted by the underclass's desperation to profit or get a better deal, even with the top males, or settle down if she so wants. What happens when all that porn/OF money, all the simping and attention, and the sexual frustration goes into AI generated images and sexbots who will never say no?

AI BF will be less popular, as sexbots will always be low status, can't provide, and would presumably not be programmed to be able to assert themselves against humans, as either a protector or sexual dominant.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseythumbsup:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>too long to be understood, too short to be laughed at by longpostbot

:marseyitsover:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyloveyou:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've seen people bring this up but only the most obstinant of feminists agree with it. Most women get personally offended at the idea of a man chosing a silicon doll over pursuing women. Their issue is that their role can be automated but there isn't an equivelent for replacing a man because the things women look for in a partner (provider, protector, stoicly dependable) can't be readily artificially created.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Without moids, who's gonna set all the women's sporting records?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseywords#:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>scrotes need women

Degenerate blasphemer detected, westoids need allah and islam

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I cant wait for the future society of men having gay s*x and fricking onaholes :marseywholesome:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironically shocked no moid equivalent of political lesbianism ever showed up. Some dramanaut should get on that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Then who is going to open the jars?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Scrotes played themselves :marseyfeminist:

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16816664242323961.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What the frick is this. Sqround bottles? Laughing at someone because their fricked up mutant hand is too weak and deformed to open a bottle cap?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The strongest mayo Democrat moid.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Common chud L

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.