Reminder that women don't need scrotes. Scrotes need women

I fully expect society to return to polygamy, in the one-chad-with-five-wives form. For one generation, it will be utopian, as the bottom 80% of scrotes will descend into their basements and never reproduce. However, the sons of the chads that do reproduce will not be happy, as now rather than having the bottom 80% of men who don't get to marry be gross incels, they're chads, and will thus take violent retribution against the society they perceive to be denying them women.

Right now, under 80-20/AFBB theory, a woman can rely on the pressure exerted by the underclass's desperation to profit or get a better deal, even with the top males, or settle down if she so wants. What happens when all that porn/OF money, all the simping and attention, and the sexual frustration goes into AI generated images and sexbots who will never say no?

AI BF will be less popular, as sexbots will always be low status, can't provide, and would presumably not be programmed to be able to assert themselves against humans, as either a protector or sexual dominant.

I've seen people bring this up but only the most obstinant of feminists agree with it. Most women get personally offended at the idea of a man chosing a silicon doll over pursuing women. Their issue is that their role can be automated but there isn't an equivelent for replacing a man because the things women look for in a partner (provider, protector, stoicly dependable) can't be readily artificially created.