Any political enemies who would attack my children - or my ability to have children - are tacitly opening up their own children as vectors of attack. Refusing to attack the enemy through any channel through which they themselves attack you is an inefficient weakness.

In other words, since Leftoids like you have no problem with attacking Rightoids like me through our children, it is also completely fine to kill yours. You were the ones who originally made killing children acceptable when you violated that moral rule which you claim to follow, so now the rule no longer exists for either side. Children are completely valid targets now.

To simplify this for you: when you violate a normative rule of warfare, your enemy is always allowed in retaliate in kind. If we allow you to use children as a vector of attack but refuse to attack your children the same way, then we are being foolish and weak. Your attempt to claim the "moral high ground" is just a psyop to evade our righteous vengeance. In other words, you don't really give a shit about the "principle" of not attacking children: you're just salty when it's your own ox children being gored targeted.

What you're saying about not using children as a vector of attack isn't wrong per se, it's just hypocritical because your team uses children as a vector of attack literally all the time. You were the ones who decided to destroy society by violating this ethical rule, and I am simply continuing the process that you started. You can't say "Never attack children" and then make one of your "exceptions" to attack our children. I mean technically you can (and you do) but that's exactly what makes you a psychopath.