Average sized nips, small sized in spirit the ick i get when a man mentions going to therapy or having anxiety is unreal like it makes me feel sick lmao. like why are u telling me that
— Kendall (@Kenny___Rose) June 12, 2023
Context
Might be a bait tweet, but the seethe is real
Drama
Congratulations you're the worst
What about the men who went to war, came home broken, and now go to therapy so they can get through life? Are they allowed to have anxiety or go to therapy? Because some of them thought they weren’t supposed to and now a lot do them aren’t here anymore.
Lmao just get over it sweaty 
Gay men also reject other men for this, unfortunately. It makes me want to hold everything inside and never show vulnerability to anyone anymore, or I'm not "manly" enough. God forbid men aren't confident and strong 100% of the time, that we have issues we're working through.
Some of these entitled immature bishes gonna get wake up call one of these days. They won't always get away with being psychopaths just cause they superficial cute. Its all fun and games til somebody gets punched in the face. Just sayin'.
Scrotes fantasizing about getting violent with women when they disagree with them
You are a grown man with a nose piercing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's so deep: you should submit it to a psych journal. Clearly your talents are wasted on rdrama
Also, the delusion of a soulless psychopath like you telling me that I don't have a superego is priceless
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Anyone can do what I do if they try. But so few people try.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's because they're not psychotic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Like you?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm not psychotic: I simply have a different moral code that the one which our defective society pushes. I have no obligation to follow society's moral code since mine is superior. However, I follow my moral code stringently and without exception, which is what makes me morally superior to you.
You're psychotic, because you delude yourself into thinking that you share the same moral code as society even though you violate that moral code constantly by dehumanizing anybody you disagree with, so that you can attack them without guilt. Having a moral code that you constantly find excuses and exceptions to violate is the main hallmark of a psychopath.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Society would not survive entertaining a parallel morality where children are a vector of attack. Exceptions aren’t broken rules, they’re additional, conditional rules.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Any political enemies who would attack my children - or my ability to have children - are tacitly opening up their own children as vectors of attack. Refusing to attack the enemy through any channel through which they themselves attack you is an inefficient weakness.
In other words, since Leftoids like you have no problem with attacking Rightoids like me through our children, it is also completely fine to kill yours. You were the ones who originally made killing children acceptable when you violated that moral rule which you claim to follow, so now the rule no longer exists for either side. Children are completely valid targets now.
To simplify this for you: when you violate a normative rule of warfare, your enemy is always allowed in retaliate in kind. If we allow you to use children as a vector of attack but refuse to attack your children the same way, then we are being foolish and weak. Your attempt to claim the "moral high ground" is just a psyop to evade our righteous vengeance. In other words, you don't really give a shit about the "principle" of not attacking children: you're just salty when it's your own
oxchildren beinggoredtargeted.What you're saying about not using children as a vector of attack isn't wrong per se, it's just hypocritical because your team uses children as a vector of attack literally all the time. You were the ones who decided to destroy society by violating this ethical rule, and I am simply continuing the process that you started. You can't say "Never attack children" and then make one of your "exceptions" to attack our children. I mean technically you can (and you do) but that's exactly what makes you a psychopath.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I dunno chief I think society would disagree with you.
Maybe you are miscategorizing the nature of the threat leveled at you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My ex was a Leftoid who secretly attempted to infect me with an STD, most likely HIV. That's a direct attack on my ability to have children, and if she had any kids of her own it would completely justify murdering them.
Other Leftoids such as yourself are brainwashing Rightoid children into sterilizing themselves with mandatory "gender-affirming" policy in schools. That's a direct attack on Rightoid children, and therefore they are entirely justified in killing Leftoid kids.
I believe that you're wrong. I think society would have my back, and in fact the reason that we currently have a populist political uprising is because Rightoids have finally realized that your political team is actively trying to murder our children and we are ready to respond in kind.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I’m not the one between us that talks at length about the pleasure I’d find in hurting those that give me perceived slights. This edit is your ego protecting your identity.
Yes, your superego is either nonexistent or too weak to drive your emotions.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, you don't talk about it, but you clearly do take great pleasure in it. There's a huge gap between your words and your actions. The only difference between us in this regard is that you virtue-signal constantly in order to try and mask your sociopathy, whereas I don't believe in virtue-signalling at all because our society is currently moving beyond the need for such self-delusion. There is no value in wearing a mask to fit in with society when society itself is starting to unmask. Virtue-signalling is an outdated construct and that why our elites are losing their moral authority: because by now practically everybody can see through their hypocritical lies.
Your pretense of morality is laughable. The reason I'm much more trustworthy than you is because I'm at least honest about my beliefs and values, and people can count on me to consistently uphold those values, without any of the convenient "exceptions" or excuses that you constantly use.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You talk all the time about bringing people into your movements under, if not deceitful pretenses, then cynically presented one’s that you might not hold personally.
I feel like I’m pretty straightforward, I got principles and when necessary I have priorities. And they lean toward stability and the general safety of others.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your principles are worthless since you violate them whenever you have an excuse. People can't trust you at all because you will violate your principles whenever convenient simply by doing some tortuous mental gymnastics about how you need to make an exception because it's "necessary for stability" or "the general safety of others." You're a greedy self-aggrandizing psychopath who masquerades as a human being in order to gain the trust of clueless normies.
My principles are valuable because I never violate them, even when they cause me great inconvenience. People can trust me because I will always live up to my stated principles without any exceptions. I'm a greedy self-aggrandizing person also, but I don't try to hide this fact like you do: on the contrary, I'm very upfront about it - and that makes me far more trustworthy and human than you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If that were the case, why am I a peacemaker?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Killing people who disagree with you doesn't seem like peacemaking to me
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Only those with a willingness to employ violence when all other reasonable approaches are exhausted can actually pursue peace.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context