weiguksahe/llo 1yr ago#3897849
Edited 1yr ago
spent 0 currency on pings
Found this paper, though it's quite old (2008) regarding salmonella in Japan.
"3793 cases in 2004" of salmonella. In 2005 Japan had a pop of 127m.
Apparently salmonella is basically a non-issue in Japan (or was at that time). Especially when you consider that an infection is most often harmless. Lethality is 0.1% (according to the German RKI), so you had 4 dead people in Japan in 2004.
Are you still masking?
Salmonella is a way bigger problem in the US, due to how they treat their eggs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Found this paper, though it's quite old (2008) regarding salmonella in Japan.
"3793 cases in 2004" of salmonella. In 2005 Japan had a pop of 127m.
Apparently salmonella is basically a non-issue in Japan (or was at that time). Especially when you consider that an infection is most often harmless. Lethality is 0.1% (according to the German RKI), so you had 4 dead people in Japan in 2004.
Are you still masking?
Salmonella is a way bigger problem in the US, due to how they treat their eggs.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context