I don't believe it's an earpiece but the fricking answer to your question is fricking obvious. Her campaign has to fool the fricking debate moderation who are fricking doing pre show checks for this kind of stuff, not just the fricking audience.
Yep that one. He retweeted some clip of the guy saying churchill was the real villain and Hitler wanted peace and was the victim, then quickly deleted it and said oopsies i didnt watch what i just posted thought its something else
PatriceOneale/acc
We went to a musical called "Oh Africa, Brave Africa". It was a laugh riot.
AnnoyinTheGoyim 2mo ago#7005097
spent 0 currency on pings
PatriceOneale/acc
We went to a musical called "Oh Africa, Brave Africa". It was a laugh riot.
AnnoyinTheGoyim 2mo ago#7005184
spent 0 currency on pings
Usually it is, a few tweets is enough to make a culture war headline spun as "Republicans say"
If you watch the debate, it's pretty obvious that (((someone))) fed Kamala's handlers the questions in advance.
On every topic, she had this pat, presidential-sounding answer, as though she had studied exactly that issue and knew just what to say: the economy, abortion, Ukraine/Russia, immigration, healthcare, Palestine, crime...it was BLATANTLY obvious that she was prepped for EXACTLY those questions and topics.
Meanwhile, Trump was just sputtering, getting blindsided left and right, left high and dry, muttering about a "concept of a plan" and some weird meme about eating pets. He looked like a senile fool, in comparison.
It's just like a test, in school: how could one kid possibly know the answers to all the questions, while another kids looks like a bumbling idiot who doesn't know anything about the topic? There is only one possible answer: cheating.
To believe that she actually memorized a specific 90-minute script, including specific digs at and responses to Trump at specific times, requires that Trump was also in on it.
It makes more sense to think that ABC was signaling what the topics would be, and that Kamala's handlers coached her on how to give "presidential" sounding answers—composed thoughts with a beginning, middle, and an end, with practice at timing them to the allotted times.
Meanwhile Trump, who had no way of knowing what they would ask about, was left looking like a sputtering, rambling fool with dementia.
Serious question: who cares? I mean, we all assume politicians are dishonorable curs, so what difference does it make if one or the other got away with some sleight of hand cheating?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh definitely afterwards
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why are our fricking lizard overlords so fricking r-slurred, chat but go off
!r-slurs !schizos
also like @Giovanna stand with Israel
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This is one of your best moments. Very funny. Love you, @Giovanna. I hope you and yours have a great day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Lazy and complacent because they've gotten too comfortable. If you're going to be a blight on existence, you should at least be eloquent.
Also
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Why would she make it obvious she's wearing an earpiece instead of just hiding a normal ear piece behind her hair
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Because (((they))) like to leave obvious hints in the fricking open for to pick on just to make them seem crazy. Jews are fricking peepees I guess
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I cheated this way during one of the exams lol. Earbud into ear, hide it under long hair and control the tts recordings with the second one in pocket
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't believe it's an earpiece but the fricking answer to your question is fricking obvious. Her campaign has to fool the fricking debate moderation who are fricking doing pre show checks for this kind of stuff, not just the fricking audience.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
How long until Eron retweets that with his infamous "Interesting."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Just waiting for elon to pop an interesting on "jews did 9/11" or "hitler did nothing wrong"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The second one kinda happened few days ago and he had to damage control lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Was that the tucker carlson interviewed one guy that said churchill was bad
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yep that one. He retweeted some clip of the guy saying churchill was the real villain and Hitler wanted peace and was the victim, then quickly deleted it and said oopsies i didnt watch what i just posted thought its something else
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
remember when trumptards claimed the beads Biden had on his wrist were some kind of device and that's why Trump lost the debates in 2020 lmao?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-false-evidence-of-biden-being-wired-or-using-earpiece-idUSKBN26L3CO/
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That doesn't seem to be about beads? And I still don't remember anyone saying this, maybe it was a popular theory amongst dozens of schizos.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Usually it is, a few tweets is enough to make a culture war headline spun as "Republicans say"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It's 2024, schizo ramblings ARE news now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I believe it and trump is fricking stupid for not doing the fricking same
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If Trump had someone speaking in his ear he'd probably start arguing with them, out loud, right in front of everyone.
No, you listen to me, DAVE. They're eating dogs! It's crazy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
We were robbed of this amazing interaction
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Death to vatziggers and magatards
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Should've had stronger aides
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I agree, everyone involved should get aids
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
All I hope is some ring camera footage of someone stealing or eating a dog comes out bc that would be funny as shit
Putting the in
spookieturkeyJump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
lol looks nothing like the one she was wearing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why do both sides have to be r-slurred
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
because we were monke not long ago and we're all faking it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
We should make whoever is feeding her the answers president, since that's who won the debate
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If you watch the debate, it's pretty obvious that (((someone))) fed Kamala's handlers the questions in advance.
On every topic, she had this pat, presidential-sounding answer, as though she had studied exactly that issue and knew just what to say: the economy, abortion, Ukraine/Russia, immigration, healthcare, Palestine, crime...it was BLATANTLY obvious that she was prepped for EXACTLY those questions and topics.
Meanwhile, Trump was just sputtering, getting blindsided left and right, left high and dry, muttering about a "concept of a plan" and some weird meme about eating pets. He looked like a senile fool, in comparison.
So obviously rigged.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've long said that education is a form of cheating
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
They only asked really obvious questions, though. You listed basically every current events issue, like what else were they going to ask about?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Think about it.
It's just like a test, in school: how could one kid possibly know the answers to all the questions, while another kids looks like a bumbling idiot who doesn't know anything about the topic? There is only one possible answer: cheating.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
The moderators seemed to cut her off exactly when she was done with her statement, like they had her script too.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
To believe that she actually memorized a specific 90-minute script, including specific digs at and responses to Trump at specific times, requires that Trump was also in on it.
It makes more sense to think that ABC was signaling what the topics would be, and that Kamala's handlers coached her on how to give "presidential" sounding answers—composed thoughts with a beginning, middle, and an end, with practice at timing them to the allotted times.
Meanwhile Trump, who had no way of knowing what they would ask about, was left looking like a sputtering, rambling fool with dementia.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
What made me laugh was that the news "debunked" it by saying she has worn them before.
Putting aside that she had no reason to even need to cheat, what passes for a "fact check" these days is top comedy.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I would in no way be shocked if either one of them cheated but this is likely some schizo nonsense.
would be funny af though if it were true.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Um.. Black people are 13% of America's population, and I think it's, 62% of homicide victims to gun violence.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/1fe0x8o/interesting/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Serious question: who cares? I mean, we all assume politicians are dishonorable curs, so what difference does it make if one or the other got away with some sleight of hand cheating?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context