Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm going to take a wild guess and say they have a different idea of 'droves' than the average person.

clicks article

:marseyxd: They don't even give any numbers! The closest we have is a tweet by some random claiming a 700% increase…which could well be next to nobody since the average search rate for any other time of year is probably zero.

Fantastic :marseygiggle:

Edit: If I dig deeper to the article the lazy butt journos at the root pulled from, still no real numbers, but the very important nuance the the searches peaked on the morning of Election Day and dropped after. In order words, right after people who early voted had second thoughts and wondered if they could adjust their vote before closing. Not a mass freaking out post results. This is the lazing fricking journ*lism I swear.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Any time there's a discussion around Google trends its usually really really stupid leaps of logic

Like during the Brexit vote there were obviously a bunch of searches in the UK for "what is brexit" day of. There were posts like "LOL UK voters don't even know what they're voting for". Not that, yknow, the people searching that probably weren't voting

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you saying avarage person dosent wake up in normal day middle of june and start thinking about changing their vote? Liess

Coconut won. Thats the fact

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

so 8 people googled it this year

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.