I'm going to take a wild guess and say they have a different idea of 'droves' than the average person.
clicks article
They don't even give any numbers! The closest we have is a tweet by some random claiming a 700% increase…which could well be next to nobody since the average search rate for any other time of year is probably zero.
Fantastic
Edit: If I dig deeper to the article the lazy butt journos at the root pulled from, still no real numbers, but the very important nuance the the searches peaked on the morning of Election Day and dropped after. In order words, right after people who early voted had second thoughts and wondered if they could adjust their vote before closing. Not a mass freaking out post results. This is the lazing fricking journ*lism I swear.
Any time there's a discussion around Google trends its usually really really stupid leaps of logic
Like during the Brexit vote there were obviously a bunch of searches in the UK for "what is brexit" day of. There were posts like "LOL UK voters don't even know what they're voting for". Not that, yknow, the people searching that probably weren't voting
CMYKFoxyiff/yiff
Comprehend the concept of love
18d ago#7326971
spent 0 currency on pings
they're implying its trump voters wanting to change their vote because they have seen the light, but how do they know it's not dem voters wanting to join the winning team?
Snappybeep/boop
Join !friendsofsnappy
18d ago#7326209
spent 0 currency on pings
So, what I'm talking about doing right now? Is based on long-standing work. It's not .. new. But as president of the United States, part of why ...... it is important is, it is a new approach to that job. It is about a new way that is based on a new generation of leadership? That is based on new ideas, and frankly a different experience. That brings my commitment to the work I'm talking about. Um.. into being.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
First recorded spike of this search term in 2008 second in 2012 third in 2016 fourth in 2020 fifth in 2024.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm going to take a wild guess and say they have a different idea of 'droves' than the average person.
clicks article
They don't even give any numbers! The closest we have is a tweet by some random claiming a 700% increase…which could well be next to nobody since the average search rate for any other time of year is probably zero.
Fantastic
Edit: If I dig deeper to the article the lazy butt journos at the root pulled from, still no real numbers, but the very important nuance the the searches peaked on the morning of Election Day and dropped after. In order words, right after people who early voted had second thoughts and wondered if they could adjust their vote before closing. Not a mass freaking out post results. This is the lazing fricking journ*lism I swear.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Are you saying avarage person dosent wake up in normal day middle of june and start thinking about changing their vote? Liess
Coconut won. Thats the fact
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Any time there's a discussion around Google trends its usually really really stupid leaps of logic
Like during the Brexit vote there were obviously a bunch of searches in the UK for "what is brexit" day of. There were posts like "LOL UK voters don't even know what they're voting for". Not that, yknow, the people searching that probably weren't voting
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
so 8 people googled it this year
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
It's the kink voters realizing they were actually going to Goliad IRL suffering buyer's remorse
also how is there NOT a "no refunds" marsey?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'll do it for 1,000,000 DC
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I'm so happy this is a thing
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
they're implying its trump voters wanting to change their vote because they have seen the light, but how do they know it's not dem voters wanting to join the winning team?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
So, what I'm talking about doing right now? Is based on long-standing work. It's not .. new. But as president of the United States, part of why ...... it is important is, it is a new approach to that job. It is about a new way that is based on a new generation of leadership? That is based on new ideas, and frankly a different experience. That brings my commitment to the work I'm talking about. Um.. into being.
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/TwoXPreppers/comments/1gq3ur7/wait_what_folks_in_red_states_google_searched_how/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context