https://www.ft.com/content/9292db59-8291-4507-8d86-f8d4788da467
"There was a backlash with some of our progressive staff that didn't want her to be on it, and how there would be a backlash," Palmieri said on Wednesday."
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Her going on wouldn't have made a difference in the election outcome, but it is fun to pretend like it's this pivotal decision.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the question of why she lost is so hard to answer, which makes it a lot of fun because pundits and journos and redditards can make up any reason they want and they are all equally valid
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Particularly since subs like neoliberal shilled for Biden the entire time and have a hard time coping that he was unpopular
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Not really. It was 70% inflation and 30% mystery meat that you can interpret to favor your preferred conclusion
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think it was 95% trains.
overwhelming majority of the us understands that putting boys in girl spots is r-slurred but the left can't or won't divest from that ridiculous policy.
Just look at Moulton's statement and the backlash lmao.
Also that interview she did bragging about changing policy to let the state pay for s*x change surgeries was so bad for her. "kamala is for they them, trump is for you" might be the most effective campaign ad of all time.
They dug into this cult and there's no way out. Totally fricked.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context