Vice President @KamalaHarris’ message to supporters. pic.twitter.com/x5xMUGTtkz

— The Democrats (@TheDemocrats) November 26, 2024

!khive

#New Favorability poll

🔵 Harris +4 (50/46)
🔴 Vance -5 (42/47)
🔴 Trump -6 (46/52)

Lake research - 11/18 - 800 LV

— Political Polls (@PpollingNumbers) November 24, 2024

FINALLY. K-SISTERS SHE IS GOING TO DECLARE THE ELECTION FRAUDULENT AND LOCK HIM UP

https://old.reddit.com/r/KamalaHarris/comments/1gz0ydh/kamala_and_tim_are_having_a_zoom_meeting_to_talk/

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gz149t/kamala_and_tim_are_having_a_zoom_meeting_to_talk/

!khive

What if (and this is a BIG WHAT IF), Kamala/intelligence community knew BEFORE the election that there was going to be interference to benefit trump? And they let him do it, to ensure they had concrete evidence… What I know about Federal investigations is this: they do not go after someone until they have indisputable evidence/proof that a crime has been committed. Additionally, if Kamala came out on November 6 and started claiming the election was rigged, she would be disregarded and blown off as a copy cat. To me, it makes more sense to maintain silence rather than start making claims that are unproven.

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gvzj9l/for_anyone_thinking_kamala_doesnt_hear_us_please/ly5um3r/?context=8

Pffft

Non-zero chance of neolib Jan 6th, see y'all at the tailgate party

DNC layoffs with no severance leave staffers scrambling, union says - WaPo

The Democratic National Committee workers' union on Monday condemned layoffs by the organization, saying permanent employees were terminated last week with one day's notice and no severance pay.

While staff jobs at campaign offices routinely end after elections, the DNC laid off permanent employees, including people who had been told their positions would continue after the election, the staff union said in a statement.

As the party reels from election losses that cost it the presidency and majorities in both congressional chambers, grapples with questions about its identity and prepares to decide who will lead it as Donald Trump returns to the White House, the layoffs inject internal turmoil into the DNC's post-election reboot. The union hinted at groomercord, alleging that people in the organization had made decisions during the campaign that "created this situation."

"The DNC's senior leadership has chosen to leave loyal staff scrambling to cover rent, medical expenses and childcare costs," the union's statement said.

The cuts were announced starting on Wednesday night and were effective Friday; and DNC leaders did not tell staff how the layoffs were determined or whether additional cuts are planned, according to the union. Those laid off included people who had been with the organization for 40 years, the union said.

Sista's are fuuuuuuuuuming

Redddddddddit

https://old.reddit.com/r/Conservative/comments/1guwk3h/dnc_layoffs_with_no_severance_leave_staffers/

https://old.reddit.com/r/moderatepolitics/comments/1gutff5/dnc_layoffs_with_no_severance_leave_staffers/

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/1guzmp5/dnc_layoffs_with_no_severance_leave_staffers/

Don't worry wuys, /r/politics downmarseyd it which means this isn't apart of our current reality!

Apparently layoffs happen after every election, but imagine working 40 years for the bluetards only to get kicked to the curb so Beyonce can speak for 3 mins and get $10 million and you get literally nothing but an "I Voted" sticker roll (I'm kidding, they don't even get a sticker roll). Party of the people

It looks like he's having a lot of fun! Hopefully he tells us what he thinks about Kamala soon!

!khive

Bored whites discuss the astroturfing campaign against blueanon.

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gtxu8e/the_hostility_against_online_questioning_of_the/

Forest witch divines star signs sent by Harris to keep recount campaign on downlow.

https://old.reddit.com/r/somethingiswrong2024/comments/1gtxu8e/the_hostility_against_online_questioning_of_the/lxr18lo/?context=8

One user discusses their newfound pariah status, then muses a neolib Jan 6th.

!khive

!chuds

!khive

Stopthesteal2024

Blue !chuds

Bluemaga

Blueanon

!khive in, motherlover! Aunt needs your energy

!khive !nonchuds never forget that democrat nonchuds tend to be smarter and more educated than dumb rural transphobic hick Republikkkan chuds.

https://old.reddit.com/r/massachusetts/comments/1gsf1sw/not_a_mass_resident_but_really_liked_this/?sort=controversial

There's no way she, Biden, and the guys in the five sided building went into this without a plan, and this sounds like a call to action to me. We need to trust our spidey senses. Mine tell me this isn't over. I'm not giving up till I see him inaugurated.

Latest update from Spoonamore. Duty to warn letter sent to Harris. Claims she has to be the one to demand recounts.

Link to actual letter

The letter contains direct accusations towards Elon

When Mr. Musk announced his $1M lottery for people to go online and sign a pledge to vote for Trump, I became personally suspicious of why such a promotion would be done. I signed up to see what information he wanted and what the pledge actually stated. He did not want to know people's socials or send them texts. To sign up you had to provide your street address. That was all they cared about. Once they had the people's names, and street address this would allow for building a pool of ghost voters who could logically be marked for fake ballots, structured in a manner which matched ePollBook and precinct data. You, as a member of law enforcement, understand criminals need certain pre-conditions to act. A database of pledged supporters with street addresses is required for this hack. Law enforcement should immediately find the team of programmers who pulled the lottery data capture. They will find those programmers immediately parsed the data into a system based on voting precincts and created macros to constantly update the pledged lists of who had cast a vote, and who had not. The programmers likely did not know they were working on a system to be used to steal the election. When confronted with that fact, law enforcement would likely gain cooperating witnesses.

Musk's team used this system to build a list of voters pledged to vote for Trump. This list could also be used to make a ghost-ballot voter list. ePollBook data is nearly always linked to the internet, and in many jurisdictions this link was being made in real time via Mr. Musk's Starlink or any available wireless network. Throughout the day, Musk's team could compare existing turnout models to likely outcomes, based on well established voter profile databases vs. the actual voter turnout coming in from the ePollBooks. They would have been able to have a very good estimation in the closing hours of polls how many votes short Trump would likely be at the tabulation level. They would also have exact lists of the pledged voters for Trump and would know who had not shown up. The pledged voters who did not vote, became the bullet ballots. With any network connection to the ePollBooks, or via other compromised connectivity, they could be marked as voted.

Apparently the election isn't hard to hack because of beepers

I appreciate that many people, even sophisticated people outside this field, think this hack is an impossible task. It is not. Just 8 weeks ago the world watched a vastly larger and more complicated one. Unknown hackers intercepted over 3000 communications devices over 24 months destined for use by Hamas across the entire Mideast. The devices all had additional software, hardware and explosives inserted. The devices were then delivered to users and functioned normally for months until the hackers triggered the inserted series of exploits and explosions. This hack, the entire world witnessed, was orders of magnitude more complicated than introducing Trump bullet ballots into - at most - 100 tabulation locations.

She is truly the queen of losing

'It's completely fine to not be around [Trump voters] and to tell them why,' Yale University chief psychiatry resident Dr. Amanda Calhoun told MSNBC

With the holiday season approaching, a prominent mental health expert told MSNBC viewers that they should feel justified in cutting ties with relatives that voted for President-elect Donald Trump.

Yale University chief psychiatry resident Dr. Amanda Calhoun spoke to MSNBC host Joy Reid on Friday night about ways liberals who are devastated with Trump's re-election this week can cope with news, including separating from certain loved ones.

"So, if you are going into a situation where you have family members, where you have close friends who you know have voted in ways that are against you… it's completely fine to not be around those people and to tell them why," Calhoun told Reid.

The host prompted the expert's answer by discussing how the LGBTQ community and other minority groups have been feeling particularly vulnerable following Trump's election on early Wednesday morning.

Citing a recent report from progressive outlet, The 19th, Reid said, "Yeah, and we know that there's been a vast increase since the election – 700 percent increase in calls from LGBTQ youth to The Trevor Project, which offers phone, online chat, or text to people – 700 percent increase in calls, texts, and chats compared to recent weeks."

The host then asked how these people should be interacting with those they know – including family – that voted for Trump, who she accused of being against Americans' rights.

"But I wonder if also, are people challenged with the idea of, how do you interact with people who voted for this?"

She added, "If you are an LGBTQ person and you know someone in your family voted essentially against your rights, or you're a woman knowing, you know, that this man was calling people the b word. JD Vance was literally calling Kamala Harris 'the trash.' He said, 'We're going to take out the trash.' I know a lot of Black women were incredibly triggered by that."

Calhoun affirmed it's fine for those aggrieved by Trump's win to avoid Trump supporting family and friends, adding that they should tell them why.

"You know, to say, 'I have a problem with the way that you voted because it went against my very livelihood, and I'm not going to be around you this holiday. I need to take some space for me.'"

Calhoun continued, noting that it is important, and even "essential" for people to establish boundaries with family members for their own sanity.

"I think you should very much be entitled to do so, and I think it may be essential for your mental health."

Do liberals and leftists hate you, your families, and humanity itself? Studies say yes.

Good morning !chuds