Just watched this on Tubi. Reddit hated it, which is proof it's good.
After a period of estrangement, a man named Nick visits his conservative family for the holidays, bringing along his Indian doctor gf Anji. At home we meet the frosty, taciturn father; the warm but clueless mother; the deeply insecure r-slur sister and her deeply insecure r-slur boyfriend; and the half-senile grandpa who mocks everyone while throwing around racial invective.
Overnight, the house is inexplicably sealed off from the world by a black metallic membrane covering all doors and windows. Despite the bizarre situation, Nick's father quickly convinces himself that this is being done by "the authorities" for their own good because of a virus and/or terror attack. The dad appoints himself their leader and enforces a series of progressively stranger orders which are transmitted via text on the television. Paranoia builds, and those who question the orders face increasing retaliation from the entity and the rest of the family, which eventually grows violent.
For this movie to work correctly, you need to accept early-on that all characters and events are part of a heightened reality. Everyone's kind of a caricature because they depict what things feel like, not exactly what they are. Most especially, the dad is a grotesque parody of the "stiff upper lip" British masculine ideal, seemingly calm, rational, and unflappable--yet following increasingly nonsensical and vile commands in service of the "authorities." His performance is a highlight of the film, and a good illustration of the Bong desire to lick boot.
It can be hard to capture what exactly makes a horror movie scary, but I found the whole movie extremely tense in the best way. Despite the exaggeration of certain characters, the presentation itself has enough restraint to keep you immersed in the situation. You're a normal person trapped in a house with a bunch of bong NPCs, and they're starting to suspect you. The violence is never grotesque but always uncomfortable, and when special effects at last come into play they manage to feel like a surreal nightmare instead of a blobby CGI climax. Through it all there's a sense of actual threat. The best comparison I can make is that it's like if Skinamarink was like an actual movie with dialogue and actors and stuff, instead of a 5-minute student film inflated to 90 boring minutes.
Now, here's what I've been dancing around:
It's an extremely on-the-nose parody of the Covid pandemic despite coming out in 2018.
( Predictive programming?)
The characters are suddenly locked in their home by an "authority" and unable to leave
Orders are transmitted in the language of quarantine, contamination, etc.
Orders are increasingly authoritarian and hostile
Characters are told that objects around them may be contaminated
Characters are sent "trial vaccination kits" and ordered to take them
The only character with medical training says not to take the vaccines as they do not know what is in them (and the needles are dirty). The sister is worried the vaccine will hurt her unborn baby
The dad forces everyone else to take the jabs anyway.
Immediately after taking the vaccine, one character starts coughing up black bile and dies
After a moment of confusion the father says that it would have happened to ALL of them if they weren't vaccinated ( it's too blatant)
The characters are ordered to "isolate" Anji, locking her in a room alone because she had a little cough earlier
The sister later needs urgent medical attention, but the father insists no one even TRY to leave.
As the situation worsens, people die because of violence, lack of medical care, and quarantine protocols, while whatever they are being "protected" from never actually shows up.
The dad refuses to look at Nick's video proof of the entity responsible because it is on his phone, instead of airing on television from the "authorities"
In general, even seemingly normal characters prioritize "quarantine" orders from a faceless outside entity over love for their own family, while punishing those who disagree.
Eventually
the TV turns into a giant wire monster that puppeteers the dad's fresh corpse around the house (I don't think this has happened yet but check back on /r/zerocovidcommunity in a couple months).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i wont get roped into redditor movie reviews anymore. they're all such kitties.
I have empathy. But I don't have this type of empathy that should be classed as a disability. softies.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
IF YOU DON'T AUTNONOMOUSLY REACT WITH CRIPPLING EMOTIONS TO MEDIA THEN YOU ARE A BAD PERSON ALSO WHY ARE YOU WATCHING TV WHEN THERE IS LITERALLY A GENOCIDE HAPPENING ALSO I NEED TO TAKE A SICK DAY TOMORROW BECAUSE I LITERALLY CANT EVEN
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i need to take a 'mental health day' what the frick is that? code. now.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
This is a documentary actually
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
The main issue is that is that the libs as anti lockdown and cons as pro lockdown
Suddenly, reality hits and its reversed.
Many such cases
Palestinian lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It could have easily gone the other way: in the early weeks, libs were saying, "let's all go out to dinner in Chinatown and take a stand against xenophobia" and rightoids were stockpiling ammunition and raging about the need to lock down against the dangerous foreign virus.
As it happens, in current year+n, rightoids are the more mentally damaged side so they wound up eating horse paste and throwing tantrums about masks, but there's no ideological reason why covid stances broke along political lines the way they eventually did.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No it couldnt have.
Boomers/cons were yelling about lockdowns from day one. The only reason libs "changed" at all is because they were told they had to to be good boys and girls. They only opposed it to not appear xenophobic
The switch happened when it turned into the flu but slightly worse, cons saw government overreach as a bigger threat and libs saw a chance for good boy points.
Rightoids saw it as a threat from the beginning and were prepping in case it was bad. Leftoids were always doing as they were told.
Also The horse paste strawman doesnt even work because leftoids ate it at the same frequency. for abortions (not its intended use, somehow even more r-slurred).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Broadly speaking, leftoids still trust institutions and society. They believe that if the FDA says a vaccine is safe, then it's likely safe.
Rightoids (not all, but enough to be an electoral majority in many places) have fallen down some conspiritard rabbit hole. They no longer trust authority figures, and believe Q drops on 8chan or their idiot neighbor (who reads Q) instead.
It's good to have a healthy level of suspicion and mistrust of people in power, but the American right is way past that level. Too many of them (you?) are living in an unfalsifiable alternate reality.
If you can't answer the question, "hypothetically, what evidence would convince me I was wrong and make me change my mind on this issue?" then you are lost to the brainworms and probably need to be put down.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao you catapulted yourself away from the conversation with that goal post move.
I thought we were just trying to talk about who was more rebellious and you lost so here we are.
Go ahead, try to change my mind on something.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The question (to me) isn't some boring generic "who's more rebellious?" Very clearly the party happy to stage an insurrection is the more "rebellious" one. It's more interesting to me why the rightoid/rebellious side wound up on team "let's all get covid".
The fact that you, and so many others on your side, only conceive of the pandemic in terms of nannystate overreach is really telling. It's a childish contrarianism that ignores the fact that there is a real disease that has killed millions of people.
You don't have to be a naive rule-follower to obey guidance that's obviously for your own good. If your mom told you not to drink bleach, would you do it anyway to prove you're not a sheep?
I'm not trying to change your mind, but you should think for yourself what would make you change your mind.
I changed my mind very early on about wiping down surfaces when I read some studies that showed it was pretty pointless. I now mostly think masks are hollow virtue signalling - but I changed my opinion on that after reading studies and seeing how rslurred most people are at actually using them. A good N95 mask, worn properly, seems like it has some value, but that's about it.
(also I'm getting over covid for the 2nd time now and between vaccine + weaker strains it's pretty much just a nasty cold nowadays)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you're fricking bananas if you think I'm reading all that, take my downmarsey and shut up idiot
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I just don't really think the lesson from Covid is "people could trust 'experts' more." It's that leaders took the people's trust for granted--and chose mockery, coercion, sanctimonious outrage, and force over the hard work of answering questions and persuading a divided public. This behavior "politicized" Covid as much or more than anything the chuddies did, and turned it into just another culture war. When you use authoritarian overreach, people are going to reflexively rebel.
You're mentioning areas where you did your own research, but you're forgetting that the standard narrative was "Don't do your own research!", "Only check the CDC website!", "Just do what you're told!"--even as accurate information was banned on many websites, and even though official guidance was often months or years behind studies available online. The censorious attitude slowed actual developments in science and resulted in all kinds of avoidable harms like "remote school."
If leaders had projected a general attitude of openness, debate and discussion, and free choice, I think things would have turned out better. Society could have handled it together, instead of it being "we superior liberals shall bring to heel the r-slur hordes"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Anyone who remembers the War on Terror would predict rightoids being the pandemic authoritarians. I think there was a switch at some point. In part it could be an outgrowth of the US right's libertarian streak. It could also reflect how many people in authoritarian technocratic roles were now trained on shitlib social politics in school (hence, "woke" banks and defense contractors).
In recent years, authoritarian technocrats have generally switched to use more leftoid signaling when they used to use more rightoid signaling. Same awful leaders, but now libs are more likely to believe them then cons are.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Its hard to explain but leftoid rebellion for the last 50 years is mostly bullshit. There really wasnt a "switch". Rightoids got slightly more liberal and liberals became horrifically authoritarian while telling themselves they are still liberals as they push porn on kids to own the cons.
Turns out, the switch was just that most libs had almost no values and just did whatever was to their advantage.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bongs are obsessed with this kind of thing.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
Reddit hated it,:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
/r/zerocovidcommunity:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context