Bottle Shows
Star Trek: (real Trek, pre-JJ Abrams) was never a high budget show. It was expected to make ~26 episodes/year. Coming up with that many scripts is hard enough, but coming up with that many that you can fit into the budget is even harder.
The first thing you cut is going out on location. Only a fraction of Star Trek episodes were actually filmed outdoors. It's a major pain in the butt bringing your whole crew out to some place like Vasquez Rocks and feeding and sheltering them. If it rains, you get no footage and you still have to pay everyone. Even excessive winds or clouds in the wrong place can ruin your day. And shooting on location too much is counterproductive as eventually the audience realizes every planet looks like Southern California.
Tillman Water Reclamation Works in Van Nuys. It was used numerous times on multiple shows because from the right angles it looks a little futuristic.
The logical solution is to go to the soundstage. Get some paper mache boulders, plastic plants, and sand and you've got yourself an alien planet. The atmosphere is whatever color of gel you put on the lights pointed up in the back. The weather is whatever you want it to be. And everything is right there on the Paramount set within easy walking distance. Heck, you can just step over to Cheers and grab a stool next to Fraiser if you feel like it. The sound stage gives you most of the feel of the starship going to an exotic location but without the risk of dealing with nature.
A shot from "Power Play" on Paramount Stage 16, known lovingly as Planet Heck by the crew. Wind and lightning effects were used to vivid effect but it was still quite an ordeal even on stage.
Even staying indoors can be expensive though. Every new set needs an enormous amount of labor. Beyond the carpenters and painters you need electricians to wire it. Lighting technicians go through the laborious process of getting all their lights in the right place, pointed the right way, with the right color and intensity. That has to be done custom for the stand ins who literally stand there on stage wearing the same costume and hair as the actors. Artificial weather effects can be almost as much of a pain in the butt as real weather. And you've got to get through this whole cycle and tear it down and be ready to start over in a week.
The bridge of the USS Enterprise-C in "Yesterday's Enterprise". This is originally the main bridge from the movies. It was redecorated as USS Reliant, the Enterprise-D battle bridge, and most Federation starships in TNG.
So an even cheaper, simpler, more reliable kind of episode is needed: The bottle show. It takes place within the "bottle" of the USS Enterprise itself. Instead of exploring strange new worlds, everything happens onboard the ship. You already have the Enterprise sets permanently set up. The crew has experience in every angle to shoot from. The extras in the background already have Starfleet uniform costumes made for them. If you want to really get cheap then skip bringing on an expensive guest star and have our cast deal with each other.
In "Disaster" it was enough to turn off a few lights and have our own characters talk to each other. DS9 could turn the entire station into Empok Nor just by turning down a dimmer switch.
You may think that a bottle show would hopelessly stifle the creativity of the writers, but they can turn out to be among the best. For example TNG's "The Defector", "Conundrum", and "Cause and Effect". Good writers can tell a fantastic story without even leaving the ship.
Star Trek TOS: "The Mark of Gideon"
TOS was in a precarious position by the third season. The actors could demand a bit more money as the audience grew to expect their characters but the network kept cutting the budget. The network had only agreed to a third season because of a massive letter writing campaign. This wasn't simply naive trekkies begging for more, they had a logical pitch: If there's just two seasons of Trek that's not enough to sell into syndication and it will be lost forever. If you make a third season you'll have 75 episodes, enough to show as reruns. So just make us one more season, even if it's not that good.
Roddenberry had burned out early on and mostly turned the show over to Gene Coon. But Coon's amphetamine-powered genius could only last so long and he had to step back too. Roddenberry had also managed to alienate half of the writers in Hollywood with his meddling rewrites. So the show was now run by people who were competent and well-meaning but didn't have.uch of a creative vision for the show and couldn't afford to. After an enormous amount was blown shooting on location for the forgettable "Paradise Syndrome" (Kirk bumps his heD and thinks he's Native American) there was a desperate need for bottle show scripts.
Sorry bros but our obelisk went overbudget.
"The Mark of Gideon" brings the bottle show concept to an audacious extreme. The bad guys trick Kirk into beaming down to... an empty exact replica of the USS Enterprise! In story there's a very shaky justification for why they would do this. Apparently they hope the comfortable surroundings will make him content in captivity. But the business reasons make perfect sense. They can reuse the Enterprise sets except without even paying for extras to walk the corridors. The only new set needed was a tiny alien conference room, which was probably just done by rolling a wall out in the existing Enterprise conference room and swapping out the chairs.
The story was pretty clumsy and most of the events just happen for no real reason. Like there's no reason for Kirk and the girl to meet unless the disease can only be sexually transmitted. And there's not really any indication that Kirk just jumped right in the sack with his uncooperative captor within a matter of a couple hours so that makes no sense either. So there's really no purpose for 80% of the scenes or the one relationship in the episode.
Kirk and the inevitable love interest sitting awkwardly on the steps on the bridge. They didn't even bother trying to get to his bedroom.
The high concept is a planet devastated by overpopulation that needs to infect itself with a plague taken from Kirk. From today's perspective as we face demographic collapse over most of the world, this may seem a bit silly, but midwits at the time were terrified of overpopulation. Earth had just experienced the most dramatic population explosion in its history and it seemed logical to assume that resources would run out at some point. By the late 1960s it was clear to experts that the birth rate in the third world had been dropping for years and agricultural productivity was exploding in the Green Revolution, but this hadn't filtered down to pop media yet. Paul Ehrlich published the popular doom prophecy The Population Bomb in 1968 claiming that hundreds of millions would die of starvation around the world in the 1970s. Of course there were no famines except for the man-made ones, so eventually the overpopulation lunacy morphed into veganism, "sustainability", /r/childfree, and general hippie shit.
Actual footage of Indians who have been waiting 50 years for genocidal maniac Ehrlich's predictions to occur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I wish Enterprise had stayed true to the lore equipped the ship with "primitive" weapons like lasers and atom bombs. I believe Spock had a line in some TOS episode that pre-Federation Earth fought a war against Romulus using nuclear weapons. That would have been interesting to see...except we're talking about Rick Berman here, so the Enterprise was basically equipped with the exact same technology as the Enterprise-D. We can't have interesting plot points anymore. Everything has to be a re-hash of an older show. Even 20 years ago. TV has been dead for over two decades.
What is it with Ricks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Most of the background lore in TOS either didn't age well or was already contradicted before ENT. They mentioned WWIII and interstellar ships in the 1990's, they mentioned human colonies and/or alien contact before warp drive (Zefram Cochrane of Alpha Centauri), they mentioned that Starfleet had old ships out that could only communicate by conventional radio, etc.
But I do agree that they could have differentiated the eras more. Imo the best way to handle it would have been to spend more time on the mechanics of how they survive in space. Have a botanist and hydroponic farm. Show a shuttle being physically constructed to replace the one that got blown up. Show Hoshi struggling to translate an alien language. Show dangerous stops to mine fuel supplies. The more nuts and bolts stuff would have been an easy source of plots while also matching with the NASA-esque uniforms and making the show feel more like a part of our future.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Enterprise actually really picked up in the later seasons. I'd say it's also not unreasonable for them to quickly develop similar weapons to everyone else they come across.
Stargate actually did that pretty well, the first human ships are using railguns and missiles but they did jack shit against anything with a shield.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah I wish they had at least paid more lipservice to the technology being ancient. But it would be pretty hard to do anything aesthetically. TOS already looked like a 1960s IBM computer lab, so you can't really make anything look more primitive without it being silly steampunk.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Enterprise was kino and I want to r*pe T'Pol till she bears my kids in a weird Stockholm human worship type situation. feel me dawg?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Amazing effort post, king. You're a quality member of !trekkies.
Clearly graduated at the top of (your) class at Starfleet Academy.
Some of (my) favorite Berman-era Trek episodes were all the cheap ones, lmao.
Black Buck Broken Trans Lives Matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good ping, King
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm honored.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
TNG is pretty good. My mother used to watch it a lot but I was never interested as a teen but I started watching it a few years back by ranked episodes and I was really surprised at the depth, maturity, storytelling and lack of Star Wars style childishness.
I feel like if it wasn't shot on video tape and didn't look so ugly and dated by modern standards more people would watch it for the storytelling and philosophical themes . The insufferable decades of nerd culture doesn't help either
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
TNG was on film, that's why they've been able to do 1080 releases with better cgi effects. It's Voyager and DS9 that were done on tape with the special effects rendered directly into the cuts. Neither have masters without effects to re-render and are locked in at 480. Maybe AI shit will get good enough to purge the special effects and upscale one day.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Oh weird, I don't know why I had that impression I know it took a long time for it to be in widescreen
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think the main thing holding it back for kids now is that it's not episodic. Everything has to be a goddarn soap opera these days.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think a lot of it is there's not really as much of a writers room influence anymore. Key writers and showrunners basically dictate everything with pieces filled in rather than writers proposing concepts
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think both still happen, but it's more that everyone wants to emulate Breaking Bad and the Walking Dead. Executives are chasing the money from a huge blockbuster show, the creatives are chasing the fame, and the viewers are chasing the high of a good single-thread plot.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
I find it to be such a refreshing show, in that it has all that you say, and a level of optimism that doesn't feel forced or cartoony. Obviously if you look too closely at Star Trek's world it's probably a little too harmonious to be realistic, but if you accept that premise, the characters still come off as real people. I find it compelling in a way a lot of other TV just isn't.
Sad they couldn't recreate that feeling, in Star Trek or elsewhere. DS9 was a darker side of that world without being nu-trek r-slurred, which is fine but fulfills a different purpose; and Voyager was just TNG but worse. And the TNG movies are a fricking embarrassment. After Enterprise they didn't even bother. "Compelling stories in a mostly happy world" seems to be anathema to modern writers.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's kind of funny to me how a lot of people seem to take this to mean something's either childish or stupid in recent days. It's like you can't take anything seriously unless there's babies being skinned alive on set and everyone's some cookiecutter edgelord.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I've noticed the stand-in for it nowadays is something that's meant to be funny. You make a comedy and then people will allow you to have a serious side of your story without it being grimdark. The go-to example in my head is Rick and Morty. I don't know how it is now, because I only watched the first two seasons, but a lot of people ended up sticking with the show because they wanted that serious angle. But the issue is it's still fundamentally cynical. You can't have your experience be light-hearted with serious themes unless it's cloaked in something else, like comedy, or made so shallow that it's completely devoid of a point (see: capeshit).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah and honestly I don't like that comedy is now used by writers to attach that serious side they want to write. It's the worst of both worlds.
I miss pure there's-nothing-serious-about-this comedies like Aqua Teens Hunger Force, where there are no morals or lessons and the show will never stop to lecture you like Rick and Morty. Modern writers can't make plot driven shows like TNG without them being overly edgy and they can't make proper comedy anymore either.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Absolutely agreed. It's the same shit as how every comedian wants to be George Carlin now. You want to make them laugh and then cheer because they agree with you. Frick all that gay shit, give me more
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'd say ATHF has a bit of a moral in that you shouldn't be like the sleazy neighbor, and it's effective because they limit it to that instead of trying too hard to make it more complex.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Funnily enough Carl is a little more upstanding than the Aqua Teens. He owns a car, his home is a little nicer, I don't remember him stealing anything, and they're always jealous of his pool.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
You raise a good point. The complete utter lack of cynicism of the show and its universe really makes it delightful to watch as well. Too much fiction is riddled with cynicism of all kinds, I think younger writers have forgotten that you can propose and debate concepts without having an underlying dourness or negativity
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I think the lack of budget and technology to have excessive special effects forced writers to actually be good at storytelling. Look at modern Star Trek series and the writing is just drivel, the characters spend half their time crying and make the worst choices possible to feed the next CGI setpiece. They expect the eye candy to hold it all up alone.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And when they did use special effects in the old shows they did their darn best to get the most out of it. It may have only been a 15 second space battle so they made dure every moment counted. Much more effective than 5 minutes of chaotic pew pew like a goddarn anime.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Weirdly insightful take from you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
speaking of stages reminds me of that one fight scene between garak and worf in DS9 where they accidently break part of the set, revealing the stage outside
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Man people were so pissed at this fight scene for stupid reasons. "How could Garak stand up to Worf at all?"
Well, he attacks by surprise and still loses.
Anyway, speaking of seeing the stage crew, do you remember the late-season TNG episode (I think Spock was in it) where you see the reflection of the sound guy and he's just chewing gum?
edit I just watched the scene and the smashing of the door looks like it was part of the shot. Even with you telling me it's a soundstage I can't tell what it is.
edit edit https://i.imgur.com/a/Oeu5DrE
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I remember seeing a boom microphone during a planet scene. I'm sure there's a detailed list of goofs with photos out there somewhere.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
"people"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
OP, have you read Star Trek: Designing the Final Frontier: How Midcentury Modernism Shaped Our View of the Future? It's about the set designers and how tthey had to make each planet look different using furniture they got from places like Pier One.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No but I'll make a note of that. Sounds like something I'd love.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
You keep saying this but there wasn't a network. TNG was the first straight-to-syndication show.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True true. I keep jumping back and forth talking about TNG (because I know more about how it was made) and TOS. When I talk about the network cutting back it's NBC paying less for the later seasons of TOS.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Duet was a bottle episode and it was fantastic
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Came here to say this. One of the best episodes of DS9, shot on basically zero budget.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Frick I wish they made more of tos. The 80s-90s series were okay, though increasingly pozzed. Luckily the OG seasons were of healthy size. Redact what are your thoughts on TOS erasure going on rn? Nice write up btw.
I only started watching in the past two years. My dad was a trekky and always thought it was cringe, but tng got me hooked, then TOS was just pure delight.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
TOS comes very much from a mid 1960s worldview where America had just gone around the world kicking the crap out of barbarians and teaching them how to be civilized. And the world loved us for it.
Post-Vietnam a lot of people wanted to believe exactly the opposite, that we're not the good guys, we should be passive and surrender all the time. So Picard is a kitty half the time in TNG and DS9 dwells on the Federation's problems.
By Nu Trek they haven't even got the basic concept of trying to be the good guys it's all about empowering fat black chicks and girls in STEM and vapid superficial slogans like that. They've never even seen TOS so all they know from pop culture is that Kirk is hot and they're afraid of male sexuality.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Lmao great run down. Is it just me or is the 60s vision of the future the absolute most ideal future? I mostly watch tos reruns just to daydream about a 60s future utopia
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah we were actually trying to solve problems: peace, race, poverty. Now we've got nothing but activists who want to grift on these issues forever.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
My hope is that grifting is part of the process of getting there 🤞🏿
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Did you see this? Absolute clown world
https://x.com/WilliamShatner/status/1751999415215141282
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
At least TNG explained the difference between TOS and TNG that Picard was primarily a trained Diplomat who still wasn't afraid of using force to defend themselves. The Romulan episodes are great where it's Picard trying to out snake the biggest snakes in the quadrant. Kirk was far more militant being a trained Commander instead yet he still gets loads of kino moments in TOS.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Kirk isn't just out to blast everyone who looks at him the wrong way. When he gets mad it's because his people get killed. But even then he gets himself under control by the end.
Picard (especially in the early seasons) has times when he's pacifist to the point of recklessness. But later on he gets better. And yeah, the way he deals with the Romulans is just right. He always manages to avoid war by making clear he's willing to resort to it if he has to.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Can you imagine a show putting this on with a straight face nowadays? Not even The West Wing was allowed to be this optimistic without making jokes about it.
By the way, the in-episode explanation for why this alien planet has post-apocalyptic Americans and Communists fighting each other? In an infinite universe, such similarities must occur—it's a coincidence!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah they had the "law of convergent planetary development" or something that they vaguely mentioned a few times. Never tried to explain how it works. They just said "yeah we're going to raid the other costume closets at the Paramount lot and that's okay because its science".
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
How to write a Star Trek episode:
1. Read a good short story in a pulp magazine.
2. Shamelessly steal it to adapt for a screenplay and replace the main characters with Kirk and Spock.
3. Go out for drinks, don't forget to pick up a carton of cigarettes on the way home.
4. Wake up with a hangover.
5. Oh shit this is show is a sci-fi. Umm, "Captain, we're orbiting an M Class planet with a humanoid civilization in a stage of development similar to Earth's 20th century."
6. That's gold! You've earned yourself another drink.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Kino hole? Kino post
Nice work
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I've always heard it referred to as a “ship-in-a-bottle” episode as it implies you have everything you need already neatly self contained. The terms came before Star Trek even iirc.
Edit: so it is just “bottle episode” and the term comes from “pulling an episode out of a bottle” like pulling a genie out of a bottle because of how easy they are to produce and it became a term during the original production of the Outer Limits show in the early 60s.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Interesting. As an anthology they couldn't just reuse sets and characters, but I imagine they came up with some formulas for writing a script quickly that wouldn't be expensive to film.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Nice effortpost
I learned about this from watching Community
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
Vasquez Rocks:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
The Population Bomb:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
/r/childfree:
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bottle episodes are usually better because it narrows the focus on the characters, and working around a restriction can inspire the most creativity. The Hays Code is why there's so much memorable dialogue in classic noir films, they had to come up with ways of saying things that wasn't just 'Frick you.'
This requires talent, of course, a lot of modern writers feel like there isn't any possibility where they could write something good. But limitations are why everything from bottle episodes, to Jaws, to films like The Big Sleep and Gilda are so good.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
great post king
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context