Unable to load image

The bottle show: How to make a cheap episode of Star Trek

!trekkies

Bottle Shows

Star Trek: (real Trek, pre-JJ Abrams) was never a high budget show. It was expected to make ~26 episodes/year. Coming up with that many scripts is hard enough, but coming up with that many that you can fit into the budget is even harder.

The first thing you cut is going out on location. Only a fraction of Star Trek episodes were actually filmed outdoors. It's a major pain in the butt bringing your whole crew out to some place like Vasquez Rocks and feeding and sheltering them. If it rains, you get no footage and you still have to pay everyone. Even excessive winds or clouds in the wrong place can ruin your day. And shooting on location too much is counterproductive as eventually the audience realizes every planet looks like Southern California.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17064616175500715.webp

Tillman Water Reclamation Works in Van Nuys. It was used numerous times on multiple shows because from the right angles it looks a little futuristic.

The logical solution is to go to the soundstage. Get some paper mache boulders, plastic plants, and sand and you've got yourself an alien planet. The atmosphere is whatever color of gel you put on the lights pointed up in the back. The weather is whatever you want it to be. And everything is right there on the Paramount set within easy walking distance. Heck, you can just step over to Cheers and grab a stool next to Fraiser if you feel like it. The sound stage gives you most of the feel of the starship going to an exotic location but without the risk of dealing with nature.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17064616176953218.webp

A shot from "Power Play" on Paramount Stage 16, known lovingly as Planet Heck by the crew. Wind and lightning effects were used to vivid effect but it was still quite an ordeal even on stage.

Even staying indoors can be expensive though. Every new set needs an enormous amount of labor. Beyond the carpenters and painters you need electricians to wire it. Lighting technicians go through the laborious process of getting all their lights in the right place, pointed the right way, with the right color and intensity. That has to be done custom for the stand ins who literally stand there on stage wearing the same costume and hair as the actors. Artificial weather effects can be almost as much of a pain in the butt as real weather. And you've got to get through this whole cycle and tear it down and be ready to start over in a week.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1706461618098513.webp

The bridge of the USS Enterprise-C in "Yesterday's Enterprise". This is originally the main bridge from the movies. It was redecorated as USS Reliant, the Enterprise-D battle bridge, and most Federation starships in TNG.

So an even cheaper, simpler, more reliable kind of episode is needed: The bottle show. It takes place within the "bottle" of the USS Enterprise itself. Instead of exploring strange new worlds, everything happens onboard the ship. You already have the Enterprise sets permanently set up. The crew has experience in every angle to shoot from. The extras in the background already have Starfleet uniform costumes made for them. If you want to really get cheap then skip bringing on an expensive guest star and have our cast deal with each other.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/1706461618443116.webp

In "Disaster" it was enough to turn off a few lights and have our own characters talk to each other. DS9 could turn the entire station into Empok Nor just by turning down a dimmer switch.

You may think that a bottle show would hopelessly stifle the creativity of the writers, but they can turn out to be among the best. For example TNG's "The Defector", "Conundrum", and "Cause and Effect". Good writers can tell a fantastic story without even leaving the ship.

Star Trek TOS: "The Mark of Gideon"

TOS was in a precarious position by the third season. The actors could demand a bit more money as the audience grew to expect their characters but the network kept cutting the budget. The network had only agreed to a third season because of a massive letter writing campaign. This wasn't simply naive trekkies begging for more, they had a logical pitch: If there's just two seasons of Trek that's not enough to sell into syndication and it will be lost forever. If you make a third season you'll have 75 episodes, enough to show as reruns. So just make us one more season, even if it's not that good.

Roddenberry had burned out early on and mostly turned the show over to Gene Coon. But Coon's amphetamine-powered genius could only last so long and he had to step back too. Roddenberry had also managed to alienate half of the writers in Hollywood with his meddling rewrites. So the show was now run by people who were competent and well-meaning but didn't have.uch of a creative vision for the show and couldn't afford to. After an enormous amount was blown shooting on location for the forgettable "Paradise Syndrome" (Kirk bumps his heD and thinks he's Native American) there was a desperate need for bottle show scripts.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17064616187981467.webp

Sorry bros but our obelisk went overbudget. :marseyshrug:

"The Mark of Gideon" brings the bottle show concept to an audacious extreme. The bad guys trick Kirk into beaming down to... an empty exact replica of the USS Enterprise! In story there's a very shaky justification for why they would do this. Apparently they hope the comfortable surroundings will make him content in captivity. But the business reasons make perfect sense. They can reuse the Enterprise sets except without even paying for extras to walk the corridors. The only new set needed was a tiny alien conference room, which was probably just done by rolling a wall out in the existing Enterprise conference room and swapping out the chairs.

The story was pretty clumsy and most of the events just happen for no real reason. Like there's no reason for Kirk and the girl to meet unless the disease can only be sexually transmitted. And there's not really any indication that Kirk just jumped right in the sack with his uncooperative captor within a matter of a couple hours so that makes no sense either. So there's really no purpose for 80% of the scenes or the one relationship in the episode.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17064616189076931.webp

Kirk and the inevitable love interest sitting awkwardly on the steps on the bridge. They didn't even bother trying to get to his bedroom.

The high concept is a planet devastated by overpopulation that needs to infect itself with a plague taken from Kirk. From today's perspective as we face demographic collapse over most of the world, this may seem a bit silly, but midwits at the time were terrified of overpopulation. Earth had just experienced the most dramatic population explosion in its history and it seemed logical to assume that resources would run out at some point. By the late 1960s it was clear to experts that the birth rate in the third world had been dropping for years and agricultural productivity was exploding in the Green Revolution, but this hadn't filtered down to pop media yet. Paul Ehrlich published the popular doom prophecy The Population Bomb in 1968 claiming that hundreds of millions would die of starvation around the world in the 1970s. Of course there were no famines except for the man-made ones, so eventually the overpopulation lunacy morphed into veganism, "sustainability", /r/childfree, and general hippie shit.

:#marseypajeet:

Actual footage of Indians who have been waiting 50 years for genocidal maniac Ehrlich's predictions to occur.

89
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TNG is pretty good. My mother used to watch it a lot but I was never interested as a teen but I started watching it a few years back by ranked episodes and I was really surprised at the depth, maturity, storytelling and lack of Star Wars style childishness.

I feel like if it wasn't shot on video tape and didn't look so ugly and dated by modern standards more people would watch it for the storytelling and philosophical themes . The insufferable decades of nerd culture doesn't help either

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I find it to be such a refreshing show, in that it has all that you say, and a level of optimism that doesn't feel forced or cartoony. Obviously if you look too closely at Star Trek's world it's probably a little too harmonious to be realistic, but if you accept that premise, the characters still come off as real people. I find it compelling in a way a lot of other TV just isn't.

Sad they couldn't recreate that feeling, in Star Trek or elsewhere. DS9 was a darker side of that world without being nu-trek r-slurred, which is fine but fulfills a different purpose; and Voyager was just TNG but worse. And the TNG movies are a fricking embarrassment. After Enterprise they didn't even bother. "Compelling stories in a mostly happy world" seems to be anathema to modern writers.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"Compelling stories in a mostly happy world"

It's kind of funny to me how a lot of people seem to take this to mean something's either childish or stupid in recent days. It's like you can't take anything seriously unless there's babies being skinned alive on set and everyone's some cookiecutter edgelord.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've noticed the stand-in for it nowadays is something that's meant to be funny. You make a comedy and then people will allow you to have a serious side of your story without it being grimdark. The go-to example in my head is Rick and Morty. I don't know how it is now, because I only watched the first two seasons, but a lot of people ended up sticking with the show because they wanted that serious angle. But the issue is it's still fundamentally cynical. You can't have your experience be light-hearted with serious themes unless it's cloaked in something else, like comedy, or made so shallow that it's completely devoid of a point (see: capeshit).

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Yeah and honestly I don't like that comedy is now used by writers to attach that serious side they want to write. It's the worst of both worlds.

I miss pure there's-nothing-serious-about-this comedies like Aqua Teens Hunger Force, where there are no morals or lessons and the show will never stop to lecture you like Rick and Morty. Modern writers can't make plot driven shows like TNG without them being overly edgy and they can't make proper comedy anymore either.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'd say ATHF has a bit of a moral in that you shouldn't be like the sleazy neighbor, and it's effective because they limit it to that instead of trying too hard to make it more complex.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Funnily enough Carl is a little more upstanding than the Aqua Teens. He owns a car, his home is a little nicer, I don't remember him stealing anything, and they're always jealous of his pool.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Absolutely agreed. It's the same shit as how every comedian wants to be George Carlin now. You want to make them laugh and then cheer because they agree with you. Frick all that gay shit, give me more

:platyhandbanan#a:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You raise a good point. The complete utter lack of cynicism of the show and its universe really makes it delightful to watch as well. Too much fiction is riddled with cynicism of all kinds, I think younger writers have forgotten that you can propose and debate concepts without having an underlying dourness or negativity

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

TNG was on film, that's why they've been able to do 1080 releases with better cgi effects. It's Voyager and DS9 that were done on tape with the special effects rendered directly into the cuts. Neither have masters without effects to re-render and are locked in at 480. Maybe AI shit will get good enough to purge the special effects and upscale one day.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Oh weird, I don't know why I had that impression I know it took a long time for it to be in widescreen

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the main thing holding it back for kids now is that it's not episodic. Everything has to be a goddarn soap opera these days.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think a lot of it is there's not really as much of a writers room influence anymore. Key writers and showrunners basically dictate everything with pieces filled in rather than writers proposing concepts

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think both still happen, but it's more that everyone wants to emulate Breaking Bad and the Walking Dead. Executives are chasing the money from a huge blockbuster show, the creatives are chasing the fame, and the viewers are chasing the high of a good single-thread plot.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the lack of budget and technology to have excessive special effects forced writers to actually be good at storytelling. Look at modern Star Trek series and the writing is just drivel, the characters spend half their time crying and make the worst choices possible to feed the next CGI setpiece. They expect the eye candy to hold it all up alone.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And when they did use special effects in the old shows they did their darn best to get the most out of it. It may have only been a 15 second space battle so they made dure every moment counted. Much more effective than 5 minutes of chaotic pew pew like a goddarn anime.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Weirdly insightful take from you.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.