!kino we love to bash recent Hollywood slop. But what are the critically acclaimed films and directors you can't stand because of how up in their asses they are?
Top Poster of the Day:
hohomothyX2
Current Registered Users: 28,758
rDrama's premiere hole for discussion and ideas around Television & Film
Rules
Women are the antithesis of kino
Absolutely no discord faggotry
Disagreeing with a janny is a bannable offence
Shit taste is allowed, but prepare to be bullied
Hole pins for 1k DC sent to
@KinoBushido
/h/kino SETTINGS /h/kino LOG /h/kino MODS /h/kino EXILEES /h/kino FOLLOWERS /h/kino BLOCKERS
Current software version: 988f469
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
There will be blood- a very surface level movie that pretends to be deeper than it really is. Can literally be summarized in one phrase- People are greedy
Network- a film with an interesting premise that develops the said premise in the least interesting possible way. Similarly the presentation is extremely slow and boring, making it a complete snoozefest. Tries to make you care about a social issue everyone's heard of a million times already and does not provide any new perspective on it
Anything by Yorgos Lanthimos, again interesting ideas which he unfortunately sacrifices in favour of presentation, in essence telling a simple story in a complicated way, instead of the other way around
Since you want to dunk on some euroslop as well, I will mention Aniara- for the third time, an interesting idea for a film, but it gets human nature and interactions fundamentally wrong, and thus instead of exploring a realistic descent of a community into chaos we get some idealized interpretation of it through some modernist-feminist perspective. Nothing about how people act in that film makes sense. There is no feeling of chaos, there is no post-apocalypse, there is just some surface level, very coordinated and sterile interpretation of such an event
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context