Why Does Hollywood Keep Making Villains Sympathetic?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JmgDTHcOwAQ

34
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I never watched the Cruella de Vil movie but I can't get over them trying to make a spinoff with her the b-word was trying to kill puppies

Guessing it's entirely an r-slured foid fashion thing bc "young cruela" as a femme fatale with the black/white hair had aesthetic market appeal

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

DOGS WERE MEAN TO HER WHEN SHE WAS YOUNG. SHE HAS A SAD BACKSTORY. :hysterical:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's her own stupid fault, dogs can sense your character

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

RACIST DOGS

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

She's an animal lover in the film, despite trained dogs being used to push her mother off a cliff. They show how she gets where she is financially and for fashion, but none of the personality from 101 Dalmatians. There was idle talk from the two Emmas that they'd like to do a Godfather 2-style sequel, showing how the Duchess and Cruella became villains, but Cruella is entirely sympathetic throughout.

There would be something like 30 years for her to become evil, but while she has all the external Cruella identifiers and has some elements of things like her ruthlessness, she's nowhere near her later incarnation.

The film is far from its 'dogs did her wrong, feel bad for her' reputation even though both those things are true. She's not that person yet, but there's another hissable female villain to tide you over beforehand.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.