Why Does Hollywood Keep Making Villains Sympathetic?

https://youtube.com/watch?v=JmgDTHcOwAQ

34
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because villains are characters and unsympathetic characters are boring

Ofc modern writing doesn't take advantage of this and makes sympathetic characters boring anyway

@Grue stand with Israel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bullshit. Evil is interesting on it's own

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

You don't have to feel sorry for or forgive Evil. But if the goal is comprehensible the story makes more sense :marseyshrug:

@Grue stand with israel

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I get what you mean, but the problem with those writers is that they keep making villains "misunderstood good guys" which is really lame. Maleficent and Cruella writers are the guiltiest of this.

You can have a 3-dimensional fun character and still make him unrepentantly evil.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It really isn't. Evil is only interesting because of its relation to the moral being explored. If the villain loses because he wastes his time kicking every puppy along the road, then the only meaningful character trait in the hero is the fact that he kicked slightly fewer puppies and therefore had more free time.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sometimes the villain is just a Great Beast to be vanquished and sometimes humans are genuinely irredeemable pieces of shit who must be destroyed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are beasts really incomprehensible though? Is an animal truly unsympathetic?

And no, no human is irredeemable. The point is that it's the villain themselves who must do the redeeming.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And no, no human is irredeemable.

Debatable. Maybe after years of reflection, religion, or hecking therapy. Regardless, when there's a crisis sometimes the threat just needs to be destroyed. Stories serve different purposes, some are for exploring a moral theme, sometimes it's just about man overcoming a great threat. It's the oldest type of storytelling. Trope subversion can be interesting, but there's nothing inherently wrong with these stories.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jail exists for the sole reason that there are errors you can't make up for. You kill someone you have effectively cursed your own life because failing to punish you would be an insult to all the people that managed not to murder someone on their way. :marseyserioushatfact:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Alien aliens are truly unsympathetic while being comprehensible.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not always true. Horror villains can be interesting despite having zero sympathetic traits

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They ruined Michael Myers by trying to give him a back story

:marseymyers:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There are plenty of horror villains with sympathetic traits btw. The "Saw" puppet guy and Jason are two examples.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Sure, but I was more thinking along the lines of The Thing, IT, Alien, Hellraiser, or Halloween. I know the last two examples eventually did give sympathetic stories to their villains, but they were already considered interesting before that.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Slasher films and gore films are absolute slop. Good horror showcases the monster people can be whether by making a person act like a monster or creating a monster to project human evil onto.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Weyland-Yutani being the reason humans have to deal with the aliens so frequently supports your point, but I do think there's room for good horror which doesn't always go for 'but humans are the real monsters'.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:!angle::space::b::e::c::a::u::s::e::space::v::i::l::l::a::i::n::s::space::a::r::e::space::c::h::a::r::a::c::t::e::r::s::space::a::n::d::space::u::n::s::y::m::p::a::t::h::e::t::i::c::space::c::h::a::r::a::c::t::e::r::s::space::a::r::e::space::b::o::r::i::n::g:

:n::a::h::comma::space::t::h::e::y::space::c::a::n::space::b::e::comma::space::b::u::t::space::t::h::i::s::space::i::s::space::n::o::t::space::a::space::r::u::l::e::period:

:#marseyzeldaganondorf:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Are you able to name one unsympathetic interesting villain? (Besides Big Jack What's-His-Name, since I haven't watched the movie yet.)

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Assault on Precinct 13 !kino

The villains are named White Warlord, Black Warlord, Oriental Warlord, and Latinx Warlord.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/17271148000433943.webp

Their motivation is being so pissed off at the LAPD that they unite their races to declare war on the city and kill a random little girl. The gangs end up storming a police station. None of the criminals have speaking roles other than violent screeching. It rules, very primal "barbarians at the gates" feeling.

BANGER soundtrack too

Also reflects reality :marseyderp:

https://www.courant.com/2020/05/29/angry-demonstrators-in-minneapolis-ransack-torch-police-station-cnn-reporter-arrested-on-air/

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Anton Chigurh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Good pick :marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:i::space::c::a::n::space::h::a::r::d::l::y::space::n::a::m::e::space::m::y::space::c::o::w::o::r::k::e::r::s::comma::space::s::o::space::t::h::i::s::space::i::s::space::u::n::f::a::i::r::period:

:#marseyindignant:


:#marseydisintegrate: :!#marseyflamewar::space::!marseyagree:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I mean, you could also just make up a story if you want. I would definitely accept that. I always thought the whole "reputable external source" demand was a bit stupid.

If you can't even do that then your position is nothing more than your own unexaminable opinion. Whereas my beliefs are open to any question you have about them.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hannibal Lector

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Hans Gruber from Die Hard

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Big Jack What's-His-Name, from that movie you haven't watched yet

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ganon man is sympathetic

Dark orange man has to be bad to balance out the light.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there's a certain exoticism and mystery you can evoke with characters so detached from your reasoning and morality that they can't be related to or sympathized with. if done right

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:marseyhatman:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

gay,

the best villains are plain evil with incomprehensible motives(because they are r-slurred).

my favorite show has the antagonist be a guy who becomes obsessed with European dolls during ww2 and then starts a company to militarize them through to the 90's. he schizo rants a lot, molests the robots he makes and makes dolls out of women he likes and forces the women to operate them remotely because he hates touching them. he has no motive other than being schizo and making more robots.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What show is that? :marseyopera:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

animu called key the metal idol

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.