So what's everyone watching this week? I've only seen some anime movies on Netflix which I won't bother you guys with since it's against the spirit of this hole
!kino discuss
So what's everyone watching this week? I've only seen some anime movies on Netflix which I won't bother you guys with since it's against the spirit of this hole
!kino discuss
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'm rewatching for the umpteenth time a little-known sci-fi show called Travelers. Absolute kino.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
i was way too spoiled by altered carbon s1 to give a shit about other scifi shows. i dont think i can name any that encapsulate the specific type of scifi i like, but s2 was so poorly made in comparison that im burnt out on trying to invest any of my time in a new show. ive tried watching travelers and i "get" it, but it feels too interpersonal and too little "cool tech has led to this circumstance" for me. its got a very walking dead vibe to it, which i dislike it for.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Interestingly I hate the walking dead lol
I never saw S2 of altered carbon bc it looked r-slurred. I remember only vaguely enjoying season 1. Not something I would rewatch, despite the interesting idea.
I don't really get the impersonal vibe from Travelers but I can kinda see where you might if you didn't watch many episodes? They do end up developing the characters a ton, but the whole first episode is spent introducing the concept pretty much.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
the big issue with s2 of altered carbon is that the premise of the story involves the same "person" inhabiting multiple bodies. this works well enough for the first iteration on screen because the multiple actors involved are the viewers' introduction to the story, but becomes a problematic in later iterations (particularly s2 as it takes place tens/hundreds of years in the future) because almost none of the actors are the same - the personhood of the characters is lost because the actors who play them change and have different personalities/demeanors/quirks on screen. the story seems much more well adapted to literature because the author is able to control the presentation of each "actor" (read: character, leading to a more cohesive continuity in character) in that environment much more capably than screenwriters are able to with actors on a set.
travelers seems to make a super big deal about scenes, series of scenes, and even episodes revolving around a single characters issues, only generally touching on the overall theme; of note would be the long hair blonde guy addicted to heroin or whatever. just like suits did, it orchestrates episodes in "blocks" of content that focus on some forced personal issue, then loosely tie it to the next one. i guess these technically move the overall story forward, but the repeated focus on individuals just to switch to another as a means of storytelling in this way feels boring to me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Yeah that makes sense. I just remembered that I wholesale dismissed the idea of watching season 2 cuz I hated the main actor they picked for it lol. If you're gonna have a person jump between "bodies" the actors need to be REALLY up to snuff to pull that off, and that guy can't even pull off a basic-butt line read.
Maybe I should read the books. That does sound like a much better format.
Yeah I can see that for Travelers. I just like that form of storytelling fine as long as I care about the character/issue in question. I've never cared about Carly and her shit baby, and I only sort of care about Grant's problems, so when it focuses on either of them for too long I start to get bored. Marcy, Trevor, Phillip, and the overall storyline carry it for me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context