This should NOT be a controversial opinion!

141
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I didn't say you were, I said drama"foids" should be shamed for choosing to identify as such when it's unnecessary

It seems like a double-edged sword. They get a lot of simping, but they also get a lot of unwanted aggression, like from Pizzashill and his followers. So if a foid comes in here and chooses to identify as a foid, she knows she's going to get some simping, but also some hostility, which is a fair trade-off. Is the positive attention that they get worth the negative attention? Clearly it is, or they wouldn't do it.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

there's no such thing as bad publicity attention t. Some Guy

Judging by the constant 100 message long exchanges they choose to get into where they just exchange bland insults that lack creativity so much they make elevator music seem interesting, I'd say that's not the downside you claim it is.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I occasionally enjoy reading the insult battles: it's a guilty pleasure

:#marseyshy2::#marseyshy4:

But if they really bother you, why not simply block the people making those kind of posts? Then you won't see the posts or the people who annoy you either

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:chadno: I'd rather they just stick to pooping up social media. It's unhealthy to be entertaining a bunch of internet losers for their self esteem anyways. I don't want them to kill themselves, just get some irl friends.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.