This should NOT be a controversial opinion!

I didn't say you were, I said drama"foids" should be shamed for choosing to identify as such when it's unnecessary

It seems like a double-edged sword. They get a lot of simping, but they also get a lot of unwanted aggression, like from Pizzashill and his followers. So if a foid comes in here and chooses to identify as a foid, she knows she's going to get some simping, but also some hostility, which is a fair trade-off. Is the positive attention that they get worth the negative attention? Clearly it is, or they wouldn't do it.

Thanks for the coins

nobody has to compete for the women

but when people do, it makes the entire site worse

"actually the state of society DOES affect you, liberal!"

OK, then it seems like it makes sense to attack the simps rather than the women.

If you don't like simping, don't attack the foids, attack the simps who are thirstposting at them

I'm not attacking the foids unless they're encouraging it like some people were doing at one point

Ted is hot and at least she's self-aware enough to admit that she seeks attention. What do you expect? She's young, single and probably looking for a good peepeeing, like so many other young ladies her age. When she eventually settles into a relationship, she'll probably do this kind of stuff a bit less. Foids who are single always tend to attention-seek more than foids who aren't.

I was not aware that the moment a women DMs me she's locked into a relationship with me

My issue is more that when I'm having a conversation with someone I see them as a human with individual traits and not just "an option"

Women aren't talking to five guys at once because they're super invested in each conversation and value them as conversational partners

You're not limited to only talking to one woman either, you know. You can talk to five women at once or even look for dates offline. I think it's normal for people in the early stages of dating to have multiple irons in the fire and then gradually stop talking to some of them as they decide which of their options they like best.

I like your junkie butt, but @sirpingsalot is right.

>If you don't like simping, don't attack the foids, attack the simps who are thirstposting at them. They're the enablers.

>[let the the bolder dramatards get their peepee wet]

My issue is more that when I'm having a conversation with someone I see them as a human with individual traits and not just "an option"

I think this is probably my biggest issue dating nowadays and this is the only venue I have to vent this frustration without being immediately labeled as the crazy incel in the room.

No community, no accountability, only hustle and bustle.

>incels

incel here, AMA

(I actually don't care that much about any of this I'm just a contrarian and occasionally get annoyed seeing people beg for crumbs because I've given up entirely and it's best not to get my hopes up thinking that I might make any real social connections with anyone on here)

I don't enjoy attention-seeking bitches who clog up the feed with their nonsense.

For me, it's never gotten so bad that I'd complain

It literally happens every time our resident queens make a topic, but go off. Youre also forgetting that queen PlsNope just made a post advertising people to DM to add her on groomercord so she could pick and choose simps, which is pretty egregious validation whoring.

Incels

yOu hAvE tO rEspEcT aTtEnTiOn WhOrEs oR yOuRe aN iNcEl

No I don't, I see stupid shit and I call it stupid shit, simple as.

What the heck are you talking about? Why am I a incel?