BTW guys did you know that Starship Troopers was a very subtle and ingenious deconstruction of fascism? I bet you didn't, it's so subtle only a real scholar could pick up on it (you should watch my 12 hour video essay to fully grasp it). The author was actually laughing at the likes of you! 
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
What I hate is when people go DeAtH oF tHe AuthOR and insist a book means whatever they think it means.
It's one thing to say, “I think this about the book”
It's more arrogant and r-slurred to say, “The book is actually about this. So says I. No I don't care that the actual author disagrees completely and entirely.”
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
While death of the author is abused, especially by wingucucks, It is very much real. Author's intentions are secondary to the story he has written.
If J.K. Rowling was claiming that Harry Potter is about killing FtM trains, it wouldn't suddently make it true.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Or how Atwood went along with "akshually Gilead is Trump's America lmao" and kept real quiet about Iran
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Get that bag, queen.
Is the Handmaid's Tale sequel any good?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you like fetish novels?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
kinda yea lol
(depends on the fetish ofc)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Youll like it, its 50 shades of Grey if Mr.Grey had a harem and made then wear funny hats
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Handmaiden is about Islam
and Atwood retconned her beliefs so that it was about uh... christo fascists
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Or how The Matrix was totally a trans allegory the whole time.
Though unironically the latest bad Matrix movie works well as a trans allegory, featuring as it does a world where some people would much rather live in a world they know is a lie rather than face the unpleasant reality.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I loved how she got semi-cancelled by the
brigade in 2021.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I mean author intentions go into a story and serve to craft it in the first place, so they aren't separate from the writing.
Authors changing their minds later is a bit different. Like sometimes authors will insist something in retrospect usually as totally inorganic marketing (yeah uh my story was actually always about current thing whodathunkit)
But whatever they had in their heads when they were writing is part of their work same as the prose and permanently above any fan opinion or even the opinions the same author develops later.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
True. They are two different things.
But, speaking of non-retroactive intent, some people are really terrible at getting their point across (like me) and their work can convey a completely different message than intended (or none). I would say my main point is that Author's interpretation does not automatically supersede other people's interpretations.
My example would be a story of a very shitty and selfish person that makes countless terrible decisions leading to his demise, and then the author comes out claiming that it's the story of how life is unfair. Most people would say it's a cautionary tale about the decisions you make, and the author is an r-slur.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Fair point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
"Also, Dumbledorton was totally gay"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I can see it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Authorial intent dont matter. See George
Lucas. Do we allow retroactive editing of media?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
that's a good example. Sometimes it's better to actively take the author's story away from them.
___________________
Its time for you and me to rise up and strike back
Don't stop until we dominate
Won't you feel great when we exterminate
All organic life!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Brain
fart, i meant György Lukács
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah, but I can also ignore them.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Imo the best defence of DOTA is that a lot of ‘intent' is subconscious.
The idea of a focused, knowing ‘intent' is often silly when it comes to right-brained stuff like poetry, prose, art. (Sure there's a basic plan but there's a lot existing beside that)
There's a reason art/writing gets compared to religious ecstasy. The realest artists frequently zone out during the process and funnel a greater impulse without really understanding. And it's why they often come across like idiots in interviews. It's all intuitive.
Speaking from exp, I'll often write something, and look back at it later and see a bunch of themes/subtext/killer imagery I never recognised.
Sure there's room to bullshit about this, and I don't like a lot of the overt subjectivism associated with DOTA types. DAE craft isn't real and weebslop is better than Shakespeares? (/r/characterrant) but there's a lot of validity to the concept.
___________________
Its time for you and me to rise up and strike back
Don't stop until we dominate
Won't you feel great when we exterminate
All organic life!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Musicians are the absolute worst at interviews. Just say you're an idiot savant and walk away from the mic. I could not possibly care less about how great it was working with some producer I've never heard of who is probably also sexually harassing you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
no you moron the best defence of dota is
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dude is actually good example that guys also hit wall, I was following him on fb and he looked like absolute shit before even hitting 30. All those parties seems to legit age you
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Words
mean whatever 
the speaker 
thinks they mean, chud
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
T. Modern biblical interpretation
The people who write things (not just the bible) meant something by them, and saying "I am going take my own meaning from this passage" is one thing, but implying that there is no definite meaning meant by the writer is just silly
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context