Orwell should have been more subtle. Animals becoming Napoleon Bonaparte was too ham-fisted
Original Post
I fell in love with this book so quickly
and fell out of love just as fast.
The second half of the book was clunky and heavy handed. I would have LOVED this piece if Orwell stuck with the original plot!! I know, Orwell is known for his social commentary, I expected it, however, in this instance, it was underwhelming and tactless. The book got more and more boring as it continued because the entire plot needlessly fell apart so he could make a few points.
(Yes, this guy spoilered a 100 page book that is 80 years old 
)
The topics and takeaways of the book, which Orwell forced fed me are: corruption, tyranny, dangers of poor education,determinants of conformity and upholding collective illusions (shoutout Todd Rose,) good people are treated like shit and forgotten under bad people, and finally, the leaders of our society are hypocritical, self serving, increasingly cruel, animals (more specifically,) pigs. But in making the point of the extremity of tyranny, he abandoned any strong call to action which I think, was a weaker trade off.
I'm just disappointed because I've read 1984 and I know that Orwell is an incredible writer and brilliant thinker so he definitely could have made all the points about society better and more subtly incorporated into the plot; like how dope would it have been if the takeaway was so subtle it's understandable to overlook it. If he made the actions of the animals in the farm less drastic and more real, he would draw an actually good, believable metaphor between the animals and people in society. That way, the book would force the reader to do work and see the effects of their conformity. It would require the reader to step back, look objectively, and draw their own conclusions to understand the level of distortion and the relation to real life in a more impactful way.
But no, at the end of the novel, a pig named Napoleon literally wore leather stockings, walking around on two legs with a whip, a smoking pipe, and drunk on whiskey.
Everything was so predictable and boring after the halfway mark.
^ If you made the mistake of reading all of that, you'll notice it's a whole lot of words to say nothing at all ^ 
What matters is in the comments:
What do you mean 'original plot'?
[OP] Animals acting like animals taking over the farm. like sure, the satire is that animals acting like humans who act like animals is a full circle whtver but the point was driven soooooo far into the ground it was boring. I didnt wanna read about animal turned napolean bonaparte
This leads to a bunch of reddittm approved dunks on OP
I didn't know the Olympics was still running, I just saw some amazing mental gymnastics
Edgy. Can't wait to never see you again.
We all make mistakes, man. Keep reading.
The dunking continues until somoene goes too far and the entirety of /r/books takes a stray
-11 points
Isn't it for children?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
everyone i don't like is a nazi
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This Redditor's post history is pretty much exactly what I expected, he's a communist true believer. The only thing that surprises me is that at least he doesn't seem to be a Stalin-lover. Cause I assumed from his Orwell comment that he was probably just upset that Orwell was an anti-Stalinist.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I wonder if that might be the fricking point.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
a british person who went to Eton is smug and biased towards the upper class?
get invaded, forced to defend themselves against the Nazis a few short yrs after making a deal with the Nazis by jointly invading another country, my heroes
takes on the whole world, make a good run for it, then get ground down in Russia, a la Napoleon
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context