But that's not what the text says. How can you not understand a text that is meant to be read by children under the age of 12. https://t.co/x1obo9Ogtt
— Nader Kabar 🍻🐴🥙 (@Melitaalsole) October 22, 2024
Highlights include aforementioned drooling r-slurs assuming this is about jews
are you really gonna die on the hill of defending raging anti semite roald dahl
— scary mae 🎃🍉🇵🇸 #1 charlica himejoshi (@hey_itz_mae) October 22, 2024
ugly people must always be smiling and cheerful otherwise my disgust from looking at their gross faces will take over. no this isn’t robbing them of agency and personhood
— steamnotif.mp4 (@kunaiears) October 22, 2024
Plenty of comments about how this is demonizing foid's appearances, or putting undue pressure on mentally ill people to be happy or whatever. We're fricking cooked man, elementary school literature is too much for people
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
If this many r-slurs on twitter misunderstood it, then probably lots of kids misunderstood it too tho
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They did not. None of the kids smart enough to habitually read for fun (shockingly low number) could frick up this badly. It takes a certain kind of functional adult illiteracy to frick up so pathetically. You have to be theoretically able to read yet despise the act of reading anything that isn't about you because it takes you a minute to even read a few sentences for quite a few years before you develop the ability to scan, extract several keywords in a flash, make a hot take, and then mentally shutdown.
These aren't just r-slurs. These are r-slurs who have trained themselves to be even more r-slurred.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
yeah or maybe kids are just dumb lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context