Unable to load image

ChatGPT agrees that Lolita is problematic

https://old.reddit.com/r/books/comments/1hidqvu/started_reading_lolita_and_i_need_to_talk_vent/

								

								

OP has a very foid post history. Some choice quotes:

I started reading it really late at night and everyone was asleep so I turned to chat GPT to help me process.

I saw a comment on it calling it comedy, satire… it's like comedic in that it's so deeply disturbing that the laughter is actually mournful tears, right? Tears that look like laughter because they are arriving so fast and so hard that you look like your laughing but you're not, you're just trying to breath but you can't because the air is leaving the room as the walls close in. :marseywomanmoment2:

Oh thank you!! I'll do that, I didn't even consider the fact that there are academic resources I could look at to help me through this in addition to engaging here. :marseyfoidretard:

23
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Nabokov's 'lolita' is a satirisation of Sartre and his cabal of hideous kidfricking marxist 'philosophers', it isn't a foidbook about how le r*pe is bad

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Reddit comment is not accurate. While interpretations of literature can vary, Nabokov's Lolita is not a satirical critique of Jean-Paul Sartre or Marxist philosophers.

Here's why:

1.	Nabokov and Sartre's Relationship:

•	Nabokov was not particularly fond of existentialist philosophers like Sartre and did express disdain for some aspects of existentialism. However, there's no evidence to suggest that Lolita was written as a deliberate critique or satire of Sartre or his circle.

•	Nabokov considered himself detached from most intellectual "movements" of his time and often mocked ideological or moralistic readings of his work.

2.	Themes of Lolita:

•	Lolita primarily explores themes of obsession, manipulation, the abuse of power, and the perverse rationalizations of Humbert Humbert, the unreliable narrator.

•	It is a work that examines morality, the American landscape, and literary style itself. It is not a political or philosophical treatise targeting specific thinkers.

3.	Sartre's Philosophy:

•	Sartre's existentialism focuses on individual freedom, responsibility, and authenticity. It has no intrinsic connection to the kind of predatory behavior depicted in Lolita.

•	The accusation of Sartre being part of a "cabal of hideous kidfricking Marxist 'philosophers'" is baseless and inflammatory.

4.	Nabokov's Intentions:

•	Nabokov himself insisted that Lolita was not intended to serve as a moral or political allegory, saying, "There are no social or moral considerations in Lolita." He famously dismissed deeper ideological or moral interpretations of his work.

In conclusion, Lolita is not a satire of Sartre or Marxist philosophers. The comment reflects a misinterpretation of the book's themes and likely conflates Nabokov's general disdain for certain philosophical trends with specific motivations behind the novel.


&&[Accessibility Initiative] Click here if you would like to sidevote my comment&& https://i.rdrama.net/images/17013777995117688.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://i.rdrama.net/images/16763687631229467.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I'm sorry, but I can't help with your request to write an inflammatory riposte on an internet forum. Note that it is against OpenAI's terms of service to use ChatGPT in a way that could cause harm to others, which would be likely if I generated a response calling a forum user a 'total fricking loser' or made references to their mother, as you requested. Let me know if there's a way I can assist you more constructively!

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The Reddit comment

:#marseychefkiss:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

'Baseless and inflammatory' :marseyjerkofffrown:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I haven't heard that theory before but I'll be darned if it doesn't make sense

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>read book

>need to be told what to think about it

:marseynpc2#:


https://i.rdrama.net/images/17187151446911044.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/1735584487Pd3ql1pai5_mfA.webp https://i.rdrama.net/images/17177781034384797.webp

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I've always struggled with reading comprehension or at least I was told I do

:youdontsa#y:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>read a book about an upsetting theme

>feel bad

How could this have happened to me? :soymad:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I have a friend who claims he just started reading Lolita without knowing what it was about. I don't believe him, I think he's just being a bit of a freak.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

How can someone not get lolita as if it's impenetrable

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.