OP has a very foid post history. Some choice quotes:
I started reading it really late at night and everyone was asleep so I turned to chat GPT to help me process.
I saw a comment on it calling it comedy, satire… it's like comedic in that it's so deeply disturbing that the laughter is actually mournful tears, right? Tears that look like laughter because they are arriving so fast and so hard that you look like your laughing but you're not, you're just trying to breath but you can't because the air is leaving the room as the walls close in.
Oh thank you!! I'll do that, I didn't even consider the fact that there are academic resources I could look at to help me through this in addition to engaging here.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Nabokov's 'lolita' is a satirisation of Sartre and his cabal of hideous kidfricking marxist 'philosophers', it isn't a foidbook about how le r*pe is bad
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The Reddit comment is not accurate. While interpretations of literature can vary, Nabokov's Lolita is not a satirical critique of Jean-Paul Sartre or Marxist philosophers.
Here's why:
In conclusion, Lolita is not a satire of Sartre or Marxist philosophers. The comment reflects a misinterpretation of the book's themes and likely conflates Nabokov's general disdain for certain philosophical trends with specific motivations behind the novel.
&&[Accessibility Initiative] Click here if you would like to sidevote my comment&&
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm sorry, but I can't help with your request to write an inflammatory riposte on an internet forum. Note that it is against OpenAI's terms of service to use ChatGPT in a way that could cause harm to others, which would be likely if I generated a response calling a forum user a 'total fricking loser' or made references to their mother, as you requested. Let me know if there's a way I can assist you more constructively!
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
'Baseless and inflammatory'
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I haven't heard that theory before but I'll be darned if it doesn't make sense
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How could this have happened to me?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I have a friend who claims he just started reading Lolita without knowing what it was about. I don't believe him, I think he's just being a bit of a freak.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
How can someone not get lolita as if it's impenetrable
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Snapshots:
https://old.reddit.com/r/books/comments/1hidqvu/started_reading_lolita_and_i_need_to_talk_vent/:
undelete.pullpush.io
ghostarchive.org
archive.org
archive.ph (click to archive)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context