Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

it's a personal problem.

Hordes of disenfranchised men are not a personal problem. Simply look to history if you want to see what will happen if this problem is left untreated.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

>Simply look to history

examples? can't think of any large events driven by ugly people with social anxiety

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/china/2011/05/13/chinas-growing-problem-of-too-many-single-men/

https://www.ips-journal.eu/regions/global/s*x-ratio-imbalances-have-grim-consequences-for-societies-4829/

https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2006/aug/too-many-men-could-destabilise-society

Does it not just make sense if you think about it for more than 5 seconds? Do you really think men will just be content to act as worker bees while living lives of isolation, or do you think they will eventually realize they have nothing to lose?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

those aren't historical events r-slur

yes it makes sense. i give one incel a gf he will happily social worker the rest of you

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Unironic rightoid agenda posters are the dumbest people on this site and impossible to have a real conversation with at this point.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

don't know what you're talking about so i'll show you how i see it

>:marseybigbrain: what historical events?

>:marseybrainlet: https://forbes.com, other links i just googled

>:marseybigbrain: those aren't historical events

>:marseybrainlet: i hate rightoids

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Why are you clinging so much to the "history" factor (those studies are history r-slur, some are over 10 years old at this point) and not the dangers of large disenfranchised populations of men? You are more nitpicky than a redditor lol. If I had the coin for it I would ping !ret*rds for you just so you could be with your kind.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

and again

>look at history

>what history

>forbes

>r-slur

>rightoid

>explanation for r-slur

>um why are you so obsessed

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Lol you get chat gpt from now on. I don't talk to people who unironically communicate in greentext.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

More comments

disenfranchised? not sticking your peepee in kitty is disenfranchisment.

They will learn to get laid or die alone, either way society is better off

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They will learn to get laid or die alone

No they will stop contributing to society at best, or actively work against it at worse. This is not a small problem. A majority of young men are sexless at this point and there will be consequences.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ohhhh now we better help them get laid or else.

I'm sure society is quaking in it's boots!

Have you offered your bussy to these young men? You know, to help stop this epic catastrophy

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Ohhhh now we better help them get laid or else.

Yes. Just look at India or China if you want to see what could happen.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.