Dns caching. Pick one of the dicords domains, do a dns request for it, see how long the request takes. If it's near instant, then it was probably resolved locally, meaning it was cached locally. The ttl for those is probably around 10 minutes, so that means it was accessed <10 mins ago. If you have groomercord open, it's making a request every second, so the domain will be cached.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
!codecels Unironically how would this work? I didn't think you could pull that kind of data from a browser.
Edit - found a possible solution from back in 2015 for mobile browsers to see if the app is installed. Are groomercordcels just phoneposters?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Dns caching. Pick one of the dicords domains, do a dns request for it, see how long the request takes. If it's near instant, then it was probably resolved locally, meaning it was cached locally. The ttl for those is probably around 10 minutes, so that means it was accessed <10 mins ago. If you have groomercord open, it's making a request every second, so the domain will be cached.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Timing attacks don't really work in browser? The clock isn't accurate enough.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Your router is milliseconds away, your local cache is microseconds away. The browser clock is absolutely precise enough to measure that difference.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
No, the browser clock doesn't give you access to that precision. They do this on purpose to prevent timing attacks.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Performance_API/High_precision_timing#reduced_precision
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
That's what I said? But in any case, you can't measure the DNS resolution time in the browser, at least not for cross origin requests.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
It's like 100ms different between a request with a clean cache and a second request. Go try it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can't reliably measure DNS resolution time from a round trip to their server. Why don't you actually try it.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
How would you detect the difference in time though? Your browser isn't making DNS requests in a way that your webpage will see.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Webpages can initiate DNS requests?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
googlegpt says no, but u can measure the perf:
fuck black lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I get 0ms for domains I am absolutely sure I've never visited
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ur posting on this site, that's gotta put u on a few watchlists at least
fuck black lives matter
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Asking for it
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I didn't even consider that angle, thought for sure it would be some browser api I wasn't aware of
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Firefox doesn't have this problem
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
some sort of dns? I'd assume
I knew a guy that had to restart + reclear his groomercord data directory on a hourly basis because he didn't trust the service or whatever
it's codecel loser lingo idc he could shoot some heads
lost him to an egirl many such cases
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I'm pretty sure Groomercord listens on a port and you can just ping localhost at some port to see if it responds
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
Bruh shouldn't browsers be sandboxed by now?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Do you have something to hide?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes, I don't want people to know about my secret harem of Groomercord kittens (of legal age).
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I don't want anyone seeing my Monday Night Football parleys
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
They're trying to steal your big wins, king.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
How are they doing this?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
OK, and? Groomercord doesn't force your to port forward a server program. How do they go from an IP to a process running on your firewalled PC?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
Nothing to hide. My appetite is huge and your IP address is: 88.202.123.201
Mercy to your soul (snap)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context