@Moonmetropolis must be unbanned. 6 reasons
#1. He is a good poster, too much train 
stuff
(I will be trans 
someday) but posted some good /h/MNN articles
#2. He has good taste 
in MOVIES and has strong 
kino energy.
#3. He is capable of squashing the Beef
#4. He could have been a lot meaner to me, @Spiderman, personally
#5. He probably wasn't all there 
when he was trying to "get Patsy fired" like how do you get fired from a gas station. It seemed like a joke to me.
#6. GOOD GOD YOU COULD HAVE CONTAINED 
HIM HERE FOR THE GOOD OF MANKIND. HE SPENT 75% OF HIS TIME HERE AND YOU BANNED 
HIM. YOU HAVE UNLEASHED A PESTILENCE UPON THIS WORLD. YOU COULD STILL STOP THIS BY UNBANNING @BooMetropolis.
Also, unban @Patsy. He should
say sorry 
(if he is capable)
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You can't be this r-slurred.... I genuinely mean this in a nice way. How do you not see how dangerous the constant bombardment of p-dophile shit is to this site?
I would ban 99% of the active user base if they showed a tenth of the enthusiasm these two showed.
You can't just say "wow! these two neurodivergents are annoying! lets just pretend it isn't happening"
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
You're not the boss of me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
And yet you just did it. Curious.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ever heard
of calming down, incel?
Maybe they are the yin/yang to eachother. Both of them called people pedos.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ever tried not saying p-dophile?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I never
called anyone that.
Why is that on your mind
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Ever tried not posting or commenting?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yes it didn't work.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
So, stop. Problem solved.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Dangerous? Lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah dangerous. Like I said before, I would ban 99% of the user base if they had the same level of enthusiasm shown by these two people.
If I am the only one who gets it, it says more about them then it says about me.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Yeah the point was that I was making an over the top example to show my point. I know that there was a p-do ping group that got banned and it wasn't an over the top example of the level of activity that needs to be done to justify being banned from any kind of platform.
I would ban anyone else who is as active, and as vocal, and as enthusiastic about pedophilia as these two cute twinks.
If I am the only one who understands this, then it isn't my problem. I have said what I have to say. I have no agenda, and I will not elaborate any further on this. Thank you for listening to my Ted Talk.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
tldr
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This site is a p-do hub which should be shut down. I want you banned from the site if you find pedophilia funny. I don't want that shit in my inbox. I have no agenda.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
ur the only one here on p-do timing tbh
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
This. This is the correct answer. I have no idea what's going on with these two cute twinks but I do know I'm sick of this shit.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context